• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful is Source A as evidence for studying the spread of prohibition in the United States?

Extracts from this document...


Josh Evans (1935 words) History coursework assignment: Prohibition Question one: How useful is Source A as evidence for studying the spread of prohibition in the United States? This map of America gives a general overview of where alcohol was banned before midnight January 16th 1920. It has three different pieces of information that it displays; Territories in which the sale of alcohol was forbidden in 1845, States entirely dry by 1915 and States with local prohibition in 1845. But the fact that the map doesn't show specific cities, towns or areas detracts from this last piece of information. As the map is in an American History atlas, its purpose is not specific to prohibition, which is why it has less specific information. This does mean it's more reliable however, as it would not of been subject to government censorship and would have been carefully researched. Also, the map is not complete, it only shows the east coast of America; the west coast is incomplete missing a large proportion of the country, almost a third. Another problem with the map is it has no chronological information, e.g. the fact that Kansas was the first state to go dry, or any order in which the states made alcohol illegal. As this question is specific to the spread of prohibition, the lack of such information is quite important. On it's own this source is not particularly useful. If this source were to be used in conjunction with a number of other related sources, including more detailed chronological information, this map would ...read more.


Unfortunately, when the law was written, a loophole was left in it; it was still legal to drink liquor. This had to be left open for the times when alcohol was needed for medicinal purposes; it did however make it easier for gangsters and speakeasy owners to get around the law. Source B of the coursework shows that out of the 6902 cases involving breaking these drink laws, 6074 were dropped for "not enough evidence" and only 5 out of the 6902 were ever held trial. This was mainly due to the corruption that went right to the heart of the system. Sources D and E of the coursework assignment show images of a raid on a speakeasy. Although they show prohibition working, it says nothing about how frequently they would take place, and in reality, they took place very rarely. Also, it says nothing about what was about to happen afterwards (mainly source D), because often the agents would take the liquor for either their own recreation, or actually sell it back to the gangsters for their own benefit. Source E shows what the government wants the public to think is happening, but it isn't even a real photo; this act of destroying the liquor would happen so infrequently, a real photograph was unavailable. The government's attempt to reinforce the illegality of the sale of liquor was almost completely ineffective. Before the introduction of prohibition, in New York there were about 15 000 legal saloons, by 1932 there were about 32 000 speakeasies in the city. ...read more.


The government at the time however, may have censored the sources that these statistics have been compiled from, so may not be 100% reliable. The person who compiled them, also, may have tried to make it look more impressive than it really is, so it seems his organisation is not a failure. In conclusion, I think that the central cause for the failures of prohibition is the corruption that existed. This corruption was mainly due to the fact that almost everyone could profit from the illegal sale of liquor, apart from the average person. This meant no one with the power to stop it was going to, and the people that would, weren't capable of it. Source F of the coursework assignment shows a political cartoon showing a row of officials holding out their hand for payment behind their backs. I doubt this would have been done near the time, as government censorship wouldn't of allowed it, but it shows how bribery went right to the top of the political system. The actual number of alcoholics, which could be seen as the real test to whether prohibition was successful, rose dramatically. Figures from the Philadelphia police department (source C) show that from 1920 to 1924, the number of alcoholics went from 33 to 874, that is an increase of over 26 times in just 4 years from when prohibition was introduced. The number of drunks also increased dramatically, going from 14 313 to 51 361 in just 5 years from when prohibition was introduced. So, in my belief, prohibition failed to meet it's aims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition - source related study.

    gallons of "illegal spirits" seized for 3 years- 1921, 1925 and 1929 (four year gaps). The numbers for this increase continually- both time it is by about 3, 000. This continued increase probably means that the bootleggers didn't give up and kept making illegal stills, or the prohibition.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    It can therefore be said that law enforcers accepted bribes simply because they saw their work colleagues accepting it and some law enforcers couldn't refuse as there was no one else to back them up. To conclude source I does prove that the policeman in source J is telling the truth.

  1. The United States 1919 - 1941, The Wall Street Crash

    economy to recovery and reassured the American citizens constantly that the cycle would return to 'boom' and 'prosperity is just around the corner.'

  2. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    His power kept increasing as his control over officials grew and grew. He paid for Mayor Bill Thompson's electoral campaign and Thompson once elected did very little allowing Capone to control Chicago. Nobody mined this, as Chicago became more and more popular as new speakeasies cropped up.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    that the people who produced the statistics were open to much corruption, I think that they can be used to show it's failure was inevitable. The number of arrests involving the consumption of alcohol and amount of alcohol seized was rising each year.

  2. How far do these two accounts agree about prohibition?

    It says how the first prohibition commissioner had strong confidence that prohibition would be enforced successfully, but then goes onto talk about how it was becoming obvious that prohibition was failing. It says: "By 1928 there were more than 30,000 'speakeasies' in New York."

  1. American History Coursework

    so disastrous that it became more expensive for farmer's to ship their livestock to the markets than it was to slaughter them by hand & dispose of them. Millions of Americans were starving, however huge amounts of food was left to decompose in fields as it was simply too expensive to sell.

  2. History Coursework: Assignment 1 - Prohibition

    The Anti - Saloon league used this and told people it was their patriotic duty to refuse drink and people believed this. People believed that the Germans were heavy drinkers and therefore did not want to be like them because people thought it would make them Anti - American.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work