• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valid is the view that, “in the period 1796-1870 the most serious barrier to political change in Italy was widespread apathy among the people?

Extracts from this document...


Unification of Italy How valid is the view that, "in the period 1796-1870 the most serious barrier to political change in Italy was widespread apathy among the people? In 1871 Italy became a unified nation, however in the period of 1796-1870 there were many barriers, which prevented the political change in Italy. The widespread apathy of the people certainly did effect the unification of Italy, however there were other barriers such as the foreign influences of Austria, the un-organisation of the revolts and the fact that at the beginning the Risorgimento was more for the elitist class. So it is not valid to say that apathy was the most serious barrier as there were other factors that together made it difficult for Italy to become united. One factor that was particularly influential was the power Austria has over Italy. Austria was a major power at this time with a large empire. During this period there were a number of revolutions across Europe. Austria and Russia were both conservative monarchists that were determined to suppress any nationalistic movements as possible as they were worried about the spread of revolutions affecting their own countries. ...read more.


People were very attached to their own particular region and in a sense were not affected by what happened in other areas of Italy, especially the north-south divide. It could be argued that this un-communication between different areas of Italy proves that apathy among the people did prevent unification, as the Italians were obviously not prepared for it. However if the government gave the public a reason to be proud and patriotic, and given them a sense of unity they probably would have reacted and been more unified. In fact not all Italians did have this apathetic attitude towards unification. There were attempts of revolutions in 1820 and 1831, but the force of the Austrians easily crushed these attempts. The Carbonari (1820s) were a secret society attempting change but didn't work as there were too few of them. There are also examples in radical democrats such as Garibaldi and Mazzini that played a big part in the unification process as they really believed in it and managed to spread the message more too the masses. ...read more.


Russia was humiliated in the war and was un-supported by Austria. Russia felt like it had been denied to be seen as the major power that it was. Russia therefore was un-supportive of Austria and changed it's policy, having been before quite conservative, to an attitude favourable of change. With the weakened force of Austria and its plight to prevent democratic states, people like Garibaldi creating a new found patriotic atmosphere among Italians, by 1871 Italy was unified. Overall it is valid to say that the apathy of the Italian people was a barrier to political change. In some ways the apathy of the people was not just because they weren't bothered but because the majority did not receive information about the Risorgimento till quite late. However it is more the foreign opposition of Austria that was more of a powerful prevention to change that affected the unification process more than the apathy of the people. It was partly due to the "domino effect" the Austrian influence had that did help to encourage the apathy of the people, as Austrians were so desperate to reduce nationalism they managed to help prevent Italians from feeling a belonging to a country. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    Otherwise it was clear that Austria would simply suppress all revolutionary activity it disliked or which posed a threat to its control over the peninsula. In retrospect it is evident that even with a less parochial society and with a united aim the Italian revolutionaries could not mount a real threat due to the lack of experience and resources available.

  2. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    did not want to be ruled by their rulers. They carried out the plebiscites to vote in order to decide their future. As a result, they agreed to join Piedmont. Finally Piedmont could unify these four northern states without war.

  1. Why has Prussia replaced Austria as the leading Germanic power by 1870?

    Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, it was a huge help in the gradual overtaking of Austria as the most powerful Germanic power. Austria was not part of the Zollverein from the start, and was not allowed in at the Zollverein renewal in 1865, so that they could not even start building up their own economy.

  2. In what ways did the balance of power change in Europe between 1870 and ...

    The main fall of Frances balance of power in Europe was in 1871 when they fought in the Franco-Prussian war and were defeated badly by Germany, Germany was considered to be very weak and this defeat therefore made France look even weaker.


    Since the Prime Minister of the time, D'Azeglio, did not like administration work he let Cavour do it, which means that Cavour was doing most of the day to day running of the State. By 1852 he started disagreeing with the right wing government and allied with the political leader

  2. What were the gains and losses between 1861-1870 of the creation of Italy?

    they had been forced to sign up and the Neapolitan armies were been favoured by gaining commissions. Education became the central state responsibility and it was not religious and this annoyed the pope. These were sensible liberal measures, but were fairly controversial because the population was overwhelmed by the amount of reforms imposed and high taxation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work