• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bloody Sunday Coursework Question 1: How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday? On Sunday, 30th January 1972, 13 Nationalist were shot dead by British Paratroopers during a march against internment in Londonderry. A 14th person died later in hospital. The exact events of "Bloody Sunday" are unclear, the enmity between the Nationalists and Unionists is so deep rooted in history that all accounts of the day are, to some extent, biased to either party. Source 1, a print created in 1587 as catholic propaganda, shows the alleged treatment of catholic bishops by English troops. The bishops are shown solemnly praying, still dressed in ceremonial robes and mitre, while being hanged and tortured. Although it is undeniable catholic priest were subjected to such torture during the British colonisation of Ireland, it is unlikely the specific events depicted in the source ever actually happened. It is far more probable that the print is a generalisation of events in Ireland, a composite of various separate events to alert catholic in England and Ireland of the plight of the Catholic bishops. ...read more.

Middle

He claims that, apart from one shot from Rossville Street, there was no gunfire or bombs from the IRA. The report had heard many nail bombs before; therefore his testimony of hearing no bombs is more likely to be true. To have heard nail bombs before suggests he had been in violent areas in the past. His limited view on these events may have allowed him to build up prejudices towards the British, especially if he had been in a Nationalist area. The content of his statement is so close to that of Source 5 is an indication that both statements are truthful. However the apparently minor discrepancy between the Sources in Source 7, where the reporter states one shot was fired from Rossville Street, reinforces the point that both witnesses only had a limited line of sight and therefore, all eyewitness reports of the day have limited value in giving the whole picture of events on Bloody Sunday. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source 9 is an extract from 'Provos' by Peter Taylor, A journilist with a lifetimes experience in Ireland. He suggests there was no government cover up (suggest in source 8) and Bloody Sunday was simply the inevitable result of centuries of conflict between the two groups. This sentiment is strongly backed up by such long-term causes as Source 1. The conclusion '[Bloody Sunday] was a tragedy waiting to happen' is a very fair one based on the evidence gathered, although, it still was the Paras one pulled the trigger and killed 13 people. Taylor's lifetime experience in Northern Ireland may have given Taylor a clearer view of events in the country, conversely, it may have given him time to build up prejudice against one of the groups. While writing 'Provos' Taylor spent much of his time living in derry, and around the bogside, this suggests Taylor may have been lenient towards the IRA and Nationalists. However, with the fair, reasoned conclusion Taylor reaches, this seems insignificant, even if he was biased, the source is reasoned enough to make itself very valuable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. What happened on Bloody Sunday?

    He praised the parachute regiment's response. The Queen later awarded the Major in charge on Bloody Sunday. Lord Widgery's conclusions were met with outrage by the Nationalist population and a campaign for justice ensued. Many political leaders condemned Lord Widgery's findings.

  2. How far are the tensions in Northern Ireland due the events f 30th January ...

    Paramilitary groups have consisted from both Nationalist and Unionist sides and terror attacks against each other enrage on. Events like Bloody Sunday and the Brighton Conference bombing in 1984 reflect the violence that hasn't be diminished for over 300 years.

  1. bloody sunday assignment 1

    This meant the closure of the Irish government and current Irish MPs had to go to the parliament in Westminster. This meant that the Irish Mps would be a small minority, therefore would not have enough power to develop a separate policy for Ireland.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    splinter groups from the IRA such as the Irish national Libration Army emerged. This again supported the British Army's interpretation of the events, as there may have been violent IRA members that took place in the march. Direct Rule was imposed, and the government tried to solve the problem of the permanent majority of Protestants in Ulster.

  1. Bloody Sunday

    The new prime-minister of northern Ireland had only just come into power; he had inherited a big problem.

  2. The train pulled into the station slowly.

    The need for companionship was clear. Like herself, didn't this woman feel like an outsider craving acceptance in a new world? Wasn't Chioma's smile one of acceptance and recognition? She could feel that hatred, some thing almost as physical as walls.

  1. From studying all of the sources I do not think that it is possible ...

    thirteen crosses which represent the thirteen deaths and it Also shows us the escalated violence in Ireland leading up to bloody Sunday. The picture also shows us the opinion of the English, which was that the Irish were to blame.

  2. Bloody Sunday - source based work

    From what we can see, it looks like the soldier at the far end, by the fence, is holding up his weapon ready to fire. Source F is written by the British Government, this could be considered a biased because the government might try to back up the actions of its armed forces.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work