• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Bloody Sunday Coursework Question 1: How valuable are sources 1,5,6,7,8,9 in explaining the events of bloody Sunday? On Sunday, 30th January 1972, 13 Nationalist were shot dead by British Paratroopers during a march against internment in Londonderry. A 14th person died later in hospital. The exact events of "Bloody Sunday" are unclear, the enmity between the Nationalists and Unionists is so deep rooted in history that all accounts of the day are, to some extent, biased to either party. Source 1, a print created in 1587 as catholic propaganda, shows the alleged treatment of catholic bishops by English troops. The bishops are shown solemnly praying, still dressed in ceremonial robes and mitre, while being hanged and tortured. Although it is undeniable catholic priest were subjected to such torture during the British colonisation of Ireland, it is unlikely the specific events depicted in the source ever actually happened. It is far more probable that the print is a generalisation of events in Ireland, a composite of various separate events to alert catholic in England and Ireland of the plight of the Catholic bishops. ...read more.

Middle

He claims that, apart from one shot from Rossville Street, there was no gunfire or bombs from the IRA. The report had heard many nail bombs before; therefore his testimony of hearing no bombs is more likely to be true. To have heard nail bombs before suggests he had been in violent areas in the past. His limited view on these events may have allowed him to build up prejudices towards the British, especially if he had been in a Nationalist area. The content of his statement is so close to that of Source 5 is an indication that both statements are truthful. However the apparently minor discrepancy between the Sources in Source 7, where the reporter states one shot was fired from Rossville Street, reinforces the point that both witnesses only had a limited line of sight and therefore, all eyewitness reports of the day have limited value in giving the whole picture of events on Bloody Sunday. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source 9 is an extract from 'Provos' by Peter Taylor, A journilist with a lifetimes experience in Ireland. He suggests there was no government cover up (suggest in source 8) and Bloody Sunday was simply the inevitable result of centuries of conflict between the two groups. This sentiment is strongly backed up by such long-term causes as Source 1. The conclusion '[Bloody Sunday] was a tragedy waiting to happen' is a very fair one based on the evidence gathered, although, it still was the Paras one pulled the trigger and killed 13 people. Taylor's lifetime experience in Northern Ireland may have given Taylor a clearer view of events in the country, conversely, it may have given him time to build up prejudice against one of the groups. While writing 'Provos' Taylor spent much of his time living in derry, and around the bogside, this suggests Taylor may have been lenient towards the IRA and Nationalists. However, with the fair, reasoned conclusion Taylor reaches, this seems insignificant, even if he was biased, the source is reasoned enough to make itself very valuable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Ireland and World War 1

    3 star(s)

    Connolly supported two ideologies, he said Republicanism and Socialism were not antagonistic, but complementary. He was a Socialist Republican. James Connolly wanted Ireland to be free, so in 1913 the Irish Citizen Army (ICA) was founded. The ICA was a group f 200 members and they were involved in the Easter Rising of 1916.

  2. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    That if they had gone for this earlier, it is conceivable that we could have avoided some of the deaths. Equally, it is conceivable that others had to go through the same learning curve. And so you cannot look at the Republican movement in isolation.

  1. The events that took place on Bloody Sunday, 30th January 1972 have been discussed ...

    the government was running low meaning that a favourable report sympathising with the British was necessary. As recently as 1998, the British government introduced a new inquiry, the Saville enquiry, as they have admitted that the Widgery report was ��unsatisfactory.�� Although as the new inquiry is taking place some time

  2. bloody sunday assignment 1

    This rising was defeated, but as long as the war with the French went on there was still a threat of another rebellion. The United Kingdom government thought that the best way to prevent further rebellion was to make Ireland part of the United Kingdom, this is known as the Act of Union and was passed in 1800.

  1. Bloody Sunday

    want to fight or be in Ireland, similar to the soldiers of the world wars 'Lions Lead By Donkeys'. The British Army fired shots at people who were injured and not dead yet, for no reason, they were not prosecuted for their actions either.

  2. Why Did ‘Bloody Sunday’ Take Place? (Russian History Sources Question)

    He was a pedlar, scullery boy, gardener, dock hand and tramp. He also joined the Bolesheviks in 1905. Maxim Gorky therefore could have over exaggerated the event because he supports the rights of the peasants. I don't think that this source is particularly reliable as I think that Maxim Gorky dramatised the event.

  1. Free essay

    Bloody Sunday

    The trial came to the conclusion that the marchers might have been carrying weapons. This lead to more hate from the Catholics and a rise in the number of IRA members. Then in 1998 a second was set up, this time it was called the Saville enquiry.

  2. bloody sunday assignment 2

    But this mood was to be "cruelly shattered" by the British Army. When the march had to be redirected we are told that "CS gas, water cannon, and rubber bullets were unleashed by the occupation forces. But we are not told if this was provoked to contain the hooligans or not, so from this the attack seems very much unprovoked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work