• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hsitory Sources. Hitler.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nicole Tomlinson Source C Question b) What impression of Kristallnacht does source C give? Explain your answer. (b) Source C is an account by David Buffman, the American Consul in Leipzig. Buffman was an American diplomat- his job was to be the eyes and ears of America in order to give America an impression of what was going on in Germany. Along with the fact that the account was written at the time- making it a primary source, this makes it a very reliable, as he would have no reason to lie because he was American and was therefore safe from the wrath of the Nazis' censorship. ...read more.

Middle

Ernst von Roth was an official for the German Embassy in Paris and the Jewish man shot him dead on the basis of revenge for the mistreatment of his parents by the Nazis. Buffman goes on to say that the local people were 'obviously horrified by the Nazis' acts'; he is obviously accusing the Nazis of committing vile acts of vandalism and murder, which he conveys by using the general publics apparent views. Buffman then discloses how 'one reliable source' told him that the violence was committed by SS men and Stormtroopers 'not in uniform'; and that there had been 'no attempts made to put out the fires' of the Jewish burning buildings. ...read more.

Conclusion

Buffman is suggesting in this source that Kristallnacht was planned, but the Nazis' are pretending it is spontaneous, which he conveys by claiming that the troops were 'not in uniform'. The 'transportation to concentration camps of male German Jews' would obviously have been planned beforehand- backing up Buffman's point that this was not a spontaneous attack. Source C gives the impression that Kristallnacht was not a spontaneous attack on the Jews, although the Nazis' wanted the public to think so, in order to prevent themselves seeming corrupt or 'hideous'. This suggests conspiracy, as the public were kept in the dark from the truth about the real reasons of Kristallnacht, which was a massive landmark in their own history. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    So Source I proves the truthfulness of H to an extent, by saying that Hitler did not approve of Kristallnacht, but otherwise firmly contradicts it, although I think that H is the more truthful source as the origin is far more reliable.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Study all the sources. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people'. How far do these sources support that claim? To determine whether the statement, 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' we must examine each source carefully.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It says that "most German people have [had] nothing to do with these attacks." Two sources claim that the Nazi party were responsible for these attacks and both sources are generally reliable - Source E's reliability is explained later. Source D does not say for definite who caused the attacks

  2. Reichstag Fire Sources Questions

    As the head of the Prussian political police at the time, Diels was one of the first people called to the scene, so he was able to investigate at the scene, only minutes after the crime had been committed (he also headed the full investigation afterwards).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work