• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Huangdi versus Hadrian. Who ruled their empire more effectively?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Huangdi versus Hadrian Who ruled their empire more effectively? Shi Huangdi was China?s first Emperor, and Emperor Hadrian was perhaps the Roman?s greatest Emperor. They both tried to control their empires using similar methods, such as building roads, training a strong army with military tactics, erecting frontiers to keep out the invaders. By looking at their personalities, armies, transport systems, and how they controlled the frontiers, I think Hadrian is more effective in ruling his empire. Both Roman and Chinese people obeyed their emperors but for different reasons. This helped the emperors to keep control because people would listen to their commands and would not turn against them. Hadrian was a respected Emperor who loved his subjects. He ended unpopular wars; introduced humane laws and protected slaves from their masters. He travelled around his empire to be with his people, to witness problems faced by them. On the contrary, Shi Huangdi was an extremely ruthless person, and was feared by the people. He believed in Legalism, the belief in strict laws and punishments. ...read more.

Middle

Fortification of the frontiers was one of the important tasks for a ruler. Both Hadrian and Shi Huangdi tried very hard in strengthening the borders of their empires. The Romans conquered England and Wales but was unable to penetrate into Scotland because of mountainous terrain and dense forests. In AD 122, Emperor Hadrian visited Britain and ordered to build a wall - the Hadrian?s Wall - to separate Romans from Picts and Scots. This also helped to minimize the threat to the Roman domain. Similarly, Shi Huangdi joined and strengthened the wall built by feudal lords, with the help of 7,000 people. The famous Great Wall of China was 5,000 km long and approximately 39 feet high, and was built to keep out the Huns and other tribes in Mongolia. Bonfires were used to alert soldiers of other parts of the wall if one part was suddenly attacked. Watchtowers were also constructed to watch the movements of people in and out of the wall. In my opinion, the Great wall was a lot more useful in controlling the empire?s border because it was higher and longer. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, Shi Huangdi also built canals to link the major rivers together, allowing people to transport goods more efficiently. Both Emperors were talented and undertook a lot of reforms to help them in keeping control of their empires. For example, Hadrian introduced administrative, financial, and legal reforms, which helped established a more efficient government. As for Shi Huangdi, he abolished feudalism, and established a centralized government. He also introduced a uniform code of law, standardized currency, weights and measures, the written language and the axle length of wagons and chariots. To conclude, both Hadrian and Shi Huangdi controlled their empires well. However, in my opinion, Emperor Hadrian was a better ruler. For example, he ended the expansionist policy of Trajan, and consolidated his empire. Hadrian also travelled all over his empire and listened to what people wanted. He was respected by his people even after his death. In contrast, although people obeyed Shi Huangdi, he was not respected because he used harsh punishments to threaten his people. If someone did something wrong, he forced them to drink poison, or ordered them to be torn apart by four horses. Shi Huangdi used fear to hold on to his power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Was Oystermouth Castle typical of the castles built in Wales during the middle Ages?

    During block 4, the fireplace is very high up, to suggest accommodation rooms above, which were probably of great taste to accommodate royalty such as the king. This king was the English King, Edward 1st who came to Oystermouth castle on a royal visit.

  2. How Were The Roman Army Superior In Weaponry, Armour And Tactics To The Celts?

    huge and muscular white people with strangely coloured hair the likes of which you have never seen before and wearing clothes the likes of which you have never seen before. (You have only heard accounts of them as barbarians and strong warriors from famous and respected writers).

  1. Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    The act had been introduced by David Lloyd George who wanted to help the old greatly as he felt it was unfair for them to suffer with the British poverty crisis. He had been a member of the Chaplin committee which showed his compassion for the old.

  2. Using Livy, How Great a General was Hannibal?

    He knew when they needed rest, and when they needed encouragement. We know that Hannibal was a charismatic leader, for example when crossing the Alps and he saw his army was demoralised he made a grand, encouraging speech to stop them from mutinying.

  1. What Factors Led to a Roman Emperor

    The power of literary influences when discussing factors of emperor worship is crucial as it is usually in literature that emperors are first referred to as gods16. Cassius Dio17 wrote of Augustus, 'We should glorify his spirit like that of a god forever.'

  2. Describing Advances in Weaponry in WW2.

    Another thing that stayed the same was the key design and shape which was kept the same and in each upgrades tanks got faster or better weapons. Tanks also kept the armour skirts as they found them really efficient and reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work