• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I believe that General Haig's, statement on his interpretation of the importance of the battle of the Somme is not a valid one because

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Task 2 23rd March 06 How Valid Is This Interpretation of The Battle of The Somme I believe that General Haig's, statement on his interpretation of the importance of the battle of the Somme is not a valid one because of the fact that Haig had the motive to lie and some of the statements he made where untrue. I will back this belief up in the following essay. The first major point that General Haig makes in his interpretation of the battle of the Somme was "German soldiers are now practically beaten men, ready to surrender". This basically is saying that the Germans soldiers were ready to admit defeat, which inevitability sent German moral spiralling down. This could be a valid statement because the German soldiers had sustained huge casualties (164,055) and moral was low because of this; however I don't believe that this statement is valid because there is no evidence that proves that the German soldiers were ready to surrender. There was no sign of mutiny in the German camp, which is usually a sign of surrender. Also Haig seems to ignore the fact that British morale is also low at this time. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand there is evidence that this statement was not valid, as if the Germans had been forced of a defensive position as Haig states then why did the war continue for two years after the battle of the Somme? I think Haig is trying to make out he is doing his job properly by forcing Germans to change there tactics but there is no evidence to prove this. The final major point that Haig made about the Somme was " The German casualties have been greater than ours" this statement could be valid because the British casualties have been estimated at 415,000 and the German casualties have been estimated at 450,000 to 600,000 and it is known to be closer to 600,000 than to 450,000. If Haig meant "ours" as in allies then our total loss will have been greater or close to the German casualties list as the French lost 195,000 and this added onto the British total gave a much larger figure of 610,000 lost allied casualties. But this again does not support Haigs understanding to the battle. ...read more.

Conclusion

and his poor tactical decisions (was it a big push or a war of attrition) and this gave him the motive to lie and the reasons to suggest that the Somme was a greater success that it actually was as his job was on the line. In conclusion I believe that General Haig's interpretation of the battle of the Somme is not a valid one because the amount of truth written in his statement is widely questionable " the German soldiers being ready to surrender" for example. Also he gives us no reason to believe that any information is valid as he does not back up statements with statistics or facts " the German casualties have been greater than ours" in this statement there should be figures of German casualties vs. British to make it a more believable comment. Haig was exaggerating to make his position look better " we have proved our ability to force the enemy out of a strong defensive position" which again is over exaggerated and there is no evidence to prove that it is true. So therefore I personally believe that Haigs interpretation of the battle of the Somme in a non-valid one. Written by Lauren Hazard ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Explain the importance of the battle of Britain as a turning point of the ...

    The Battle of Britain was not as important as Operation Overlord as a turning point because the Battle of Britain didn't turn the tides of war, whereas D-day started the beginning of the end to Nazi Europe. Although Overlord is clearly the most important turning point on the Western Front

  2. How important was Haig's role in the successes and failures of the British Army ...

    The tactic applied during the war was against a war of attrition which involved two sides trying to wear each other down by attacking the enemy's trenches with artillery bombardment and infantry advances. This involved massive loss of life. By looking at the overall figures of the war it will

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    "There is nothing more difficult than planning, knowing it would cause death." Haig has been blamed for squandering the lives of millions of men, but no one could ever say that he did it willingly. Therefore many people say that Haig's ability to plan attacks, knowing that people would die, was one of his strengths.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    They had not organised contingency plans as they were so certain of success. Even after the disasters of the 1st day, they were not deterred and continued using their strategy, losing more men. Their basic strategy was that if more Germans were killed than British, an Allied victory would result.

  1. The Defensive Features of Rochester Castle in 1215

    The next feature which the attackers would come across would be the ditch, which would be extremely steep in medieval times and if the weather was wet it would be very slippery and could even cause people to break bones.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    In these respects, at least, Haig had successfully achieved what he had set out to do. However, in many other respects, Haig failed to fulfil expectations. The effort to take ground from the Germans, however, was significantly hindered by a combination of mishaps and Haig's actions.

  1. history somme

    Source E is a comic sketch drawn, it shows how a general (that looks identical to Haig) is asking a Sergeant major the difference between a practice and the real war, and the Sergeant major replies saying how in the real war there's 'The absence of a general'.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    From October to December the French staged a counter-attack at Verdun and succeeded in recapturing Forts Douaumont and Vaux (November 2), restoring the situation that had prevailed before February. In August, Hindenburg replaced Falkenhayn as German chief of staff with General Erich Ludendorff.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work