• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I believe that the most significant person in the history of women is Emmeline Pankhurst.

Extracts from this document...


Significant women-Emmeline Pankhurst I believe that the most significant person in history of women is Emmeline Pankhurst. Historians disagree about the effect of her activity on public support for the cause of women's votes. However she was widely, criticised for her militant tactics,her work is recognised as a crucial element in achieving women suffrage in Britain. I am going to explain what it means to be significant, a biography of Emmeline Pankhurst, her actions, the long term and short term impacts of her actions, more importantly I am going to conclude the significance of Emmeline Pankhurst in relation to other women. There are many factors to being significant in history. The meaning of significant is important in some way. To be significant I believe you have to be someone, who creates a great change, with a very big impact, that affects a large number of people, or someone who creates a change on government legislations. Someone that can make changes that can change so much more with just one goal. Emmeline Pankhurst born 15th July 1858 was a leading women's rights activist, who led the movement to win the right for women to vote. Born as Emmeline Goulden, raised in Manchester into a family with a tradition of radical politics. ...read more.


They repeatedly did this, catching the attention of the public, getting even more supporters. Eventually arson became a common tactic among WSPU members. This is called the 'cat and mouse act,' introduced in 1913 people on hunger strikes were let out of prison, but then re-arrested when they grew back their strength. Below is a picture to demonstrate her arrests: The 1913 Derby and the act of Emily Wilding Davison shocked but also outraged the society. There were groups of people who believed, she committed suicide, nevertheless others believed, that she was attempting to pin a suffragette banner on the kings horse, but ended up in a tragic accident. They're are proof of both hypothesis for example; before the horse game, information was collected that she had bought a return train ticket back home, however they're is proof of her trying to commit suicide for example; Emily Wilding Davison wanted to raise a profile for the suffragettes, maybe this is what she was suggesting. The period of militancy was ended abruptly on the outbreak of war in 1914, when Emmeline turned her energies to supporting the war. In 1918, women had made their point, while doing all the men's jobs while they were away at war, employers saw that woman could do men's jobs without difficulty and without and training, which meant that they would ...read more.


She most probably would've been doing a very small job or some house job if it weren't for Emmeline Pankhurst. Government legislations would've been different now if it weren't for Emmeline. Lets use another person, for example, Emily Wilding Davison. Both women were from the same time period, so what make Emmeline more significant then Emily? I must admit that Emily Wilding Davison's death triggered the vote for women greatly. However if Emmeline Pankhurst never brought up the idea of trying to fight for women's equal rights to vote the maybe Emily mightn't not died this way and triggered the decision of women votes so greatly. Emmeline is definitely the most significant related to other woman because she created a change, that her actions and ways now still stand to this very day. She ticks all the boxes of what makes a significant person, but not only that but she has changed a government legislation that has changed whole lot more with it, for example, the way people think nowadays, education, jobs etc... By finally getting the vote just after she died, it meant politicians had to listen to the views of women, which then led to a more fairer peaceful Britain for women to live in, more importantly a more fairer place for the future children of Britain to live in. By Nilema Nasrine 9.2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The object of this coursework is to gather information and data, on how woman ...

    The poster addresses to the people to stop the torture ' of woman by voting against Herbert Asquith the Liberal prime minister. It caused an outcry in the public, as only lunatics were force fed. Perhaps due to this out cry and the pressure of not knowing how to deal

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    During 1913-1914, the headlines were full of reports of nation-wide suffragette 'outrages'. The NUWSS worked hard to put the message across that the entire women's suffrage movement was not controlled by fanatics. This highlighted the difference in the methods used by the suffragists and suffragettes because the suffragettes wanted to grab all the headlines and be perceived as 'fanatics'.

  1. Cause of Andover workhouse scandal?

    The workhouse form stated "Crush half a bushel of bones by hand through a quarter if an inch sieve" the form also stated "No such person should be detained against his or her will" This means that workers are expected to crush bones by hand through a sieve that was

  2. Emily Wilding Davison

    This made the public realise, how important the vote meant to her, and how noble she was to give up her life for the nation. This poster made all women look up to her, to help their cause. "Emily Davison clung to her conviction that one great tragedy, the deliberate

  1. Votes for Women

    than to be voters themselves' and that; therefore, women should not get the vote. In conclusion, Source B supports the evidence of Source C in that the Suffragettes brought negative publicity to their cause. However, Source C appears to agree with Suffragettes cause.

  2. 'It seems that history is to blame.' (Joyce, Ulysses) Discuss the representation of ...

    O'Neill recognises the duality of his situation, a duality inherent to Irish history on the whole, it seems. O'Neill is a member of the Protestant, English court, yet also the leader of the Gaelic chieftains; a Catholic Irishman married to a Protestant 'Upstart;' a leading Irish politician with an 'Old English' secretary.

  1. Were the 1980 Hunger Strikes the most significant IRA event of that decade?

    Margaret Thatcher contemplating withdrawing Britain from Ireland all together was another reason why the Hunger Strikes of the 1980?s were such a significant IRA action. An extract from an article in ?The Guardian? a British Newspaper printed in 2011 states ?The Thatcher government wobbled in its resolution to resist the

  2. Anne Frank Factfile

    she would love her as she did her father, she got on with Margot better than before in the Annexe and she thought Fitz was irritable. Victor Kugler, Johannes Kleiman, Miep Gies, Bep Voskuijl, Miep?s husband Jan Gies ans Voskuijl?s father Johannes Henrik Voskuijl were the helpers for the secret annexe and were the only one?s who knew about it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work