• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the battle of Passchendaele.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q3. I think Haig was a bad leader who made many critical mistakes during the battle of Passchendaele. From looking at the sources I can see many bad views of Haig as a war leader, although some good views can also be detected. In source A it is evident that Haig always ensured that his army was well equipped by asking the War Cabinet for more ammunition. I also know that Haig was one of the first generals to pay attention to aerial intelligence, this was very good for Britain as it put them at an advantage over many countries. Also from my studies I have found out that Haig had always managed to hold enemy advances back. It is also know that Haig had good leadership qualities being strong willed and often ruthless. Haig was also committed when attacking by always going out in all out attack. The reputation of Haig and the fact that his chain of command was very much under his control was also a factor that can be said to make Haig a good war leader. All these reasons and the fact that Haig was also very religious to some made Haig a good war leader. This is because he was willing to sacrifice the lives of his men and himself for the cause in which he believed in. however there are many factors that may make Haig a bad war leader. For example source b, an extract from an account of the battle of Passchendaele published in 1931 and written by General Gough. ...read more.

Middle

This quote from Haig's son confirms the terrible mistakes told by other generals and historians made by Field Marshall Haig. There are 2 sides locked in heavy debate about the question, "does Haig deserve his reputation as a bad war leader?". Although Haig made his name as a good soldier and uprising General in the Boer war and Zulu wars, I think he deserved his reputation as a bad war leader. Although some people may argue that he was a courageous commander, fed fake intelligence and betrayed by politicians. I disagree with this and feel that incidents as I have mentioned earlier about the battle was proceeding, and the great loss of life in the battle of the Somme, support the theory that Haig deserved his reputation as a bad war leader Q4. in his war memoirs written in the 1930's Lloyd George called Pesschendaele, "the senseless campaign´┐Ż". From looking at the sources I can see that there are some extracts that support what George wrote in his memoirs. However there are also some sources that show this view by Lloyd George as not true. In source A Haig is very pessimistic about Passchendaele and only willing to support Italy with arms. The quote from source A says, "Lloyd George seemed to think the decisive moment of the war would be 1918. Until then we ought to do little or nothing except support Italy with guns and gunners". This quote supports the view that Lloyd George thought Pesschendaele was a senseless campaign. ...read more.

Conclusion

It says "the war cabinet deserves to congratulate you upon the achievements of the British armies in the great battle which has been raging since 31 July". This totally contradicts Lloyd George's view that he later wrote about in his memoirs. This leads me to think that this was nothing but a moral booster and that his view later on about a senseless campaign is written in hindsight. My research also tells of how lives were not necessarily given away for any reason. Some experts believe that Haig's actions in the battle did not make Passchendaele a senseless campaign. A source from the historian Andrew Wilson quotes Robert Burns, 102, who fought in the battle as saying, "the enormous loss of life was tragic but what else could be done?" He later goes on to say about Haig and the Battle of Passchendaele. "A weaker man might have given in but then the outcome would have been unimaginable". This shows that not everyone agrees with Lloyd George's view that Passchendaele was a senseless campaign. Dr Gerard De Groot also says, "Some have suggested that is another man had been in charge they could have saved thousands of lives. I simply don't think this would have been the case". Many other historians have also echoed this feeling about Haig and Passchendaele and its worth as a whole. Overall most of the sources agree with Lloyd George that Passchendaele was a senseless campaign. The fact that one of these sources was also from generals also involved in the war also supports Lloyd George and his view that the Battle of Passchendaele was 'A senseless campaign'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    He 'ignored the counsel' offered to him, when advised not to employ tanks at the Somme. He strongly believed that it would take men's lives to beat the enemy, and he was not afraid of making difficult choices. To his men, he would be labelled a 'butcher', which in some

  2. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain.

    Yet despite this, the Germans were gaining the advantage simply because they could afford to lose planes and pilots and the British could not. The RAF was pushed to almost breaking point, but the Germans could not break them no matter how hard they tried.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    A new commander-in-chief was appointed on 10th December 1916 to try and break the stalemate, General Sir Douglas Haig. He was 54 years of age, he had a lot of experience and was instrumental in leading the British forces to victory in the Boer War in South Africa.

  2. Was General Haig a bad leader, source based

    We also know that the battle was very unsuccessful and did not go right as thousands were killed or hurt; which suggests that Haig was lying. Finally Source F is an account from a modern historians perspective in 1989 on Field Marshall Haig as a military commander.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    They say that in all ninety-seven German divisions were drawn into the fighting, and it was during the Somme that "what still remained of the first class peace trained German infantry was expended on the battlefield." What they fail to acknowledge was the fact that exactly the same thing was happening to the British soldiers.

  2. Using the sources provided and your own knowledge of Haig, explain whether you think ...

    Haig also failed to learn from his mistakes he had made in the past. Neuve Chapelle before the Somme was a small trial run. Both sides could have learnt from this. The Germans learnt to build very deep dugouts and to have better defences.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    Source E indicates failure. Source F also indicates failure for the same reason, but the opposite variation of that reason. It was the evacuee who was wealthy. He obviously had a bad time, arguably worse that a poor evacuee in a wealthy home.

  2. General Haig

    This suggests that he thinks that historians now know why it had to be fought that way and people cannot judge what happened without strong evidence that they do. The message he is trying to put across is that his father did the right thing and if historians want to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work