• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I will describe the lives of three types of people: The Royal Family, The workers and The Peasants between the periods of 1896-1917 in Russia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Thomas Henesey 19th September 2002 History Coursework 1. I will describe the lives of three types of people: The Royal Family, The workers and The Peasants between the periods of 1896-1917 in Russia. I will start off by describing the life and the ways in which the Royal Family lived. When Nicholas II became Tsar in 1894 he didn't know how to run Russia. He was shy and weak and his wife was very overpowering. When Nicholas II became Tsar he was Russia's autocrat and he had total power. Being the autocrat meant that he could make laws by himself and appoint his government often they would be close friends from his court circle. Being an autocracy is the opposite of what we live in, a democracy, where the autocrat made all laws without consultation with any form of parliament. Unlike, a democracy where a parliament has to take a vote on passing laws. To carry out his orders Nicholas relied on the army where the officers where mainly nobles, the secret police, the Okhrana or Protective Section, who would jail anyone for speaking out against the Tsar or plotted to over through him, the aristocrats who owned vast estates, where lived the bulk of Russia's population, the peasants. The Royal Family were weak. This is shown by how much they rely on Rasputin when he comes along. The Royal Family was very rich they owned eight different palaces and employed 15,000 servants. When the Royal Family moved from one palace to another they had up to twenty railway carriages just to carry the luggage. Nicholas and Alexandra were happily married with five children during the first few years of marriage. ...read more.

Middle

Many thought that they were having an affair and this really dragged down the reputation of the royal family down to gutter level with the peasants as it was thought a peasant like thing to have affairs. On 30th December 1916 Prince Yusupov murdered Rasputin, first he fed him poison in cakes and wine. That did not work so he shot him and finally while he was just still living he threw him into the river Neva. Rasputin was so disasterous for Russia because before he died he had already angered a lot of Russians and because he was seen as one with the Royal Family although the Royal Family hadn't done anything wrong his actions had offended many. Only three months after the death of Rasputin the whole of Russia went into disarray and the Tsar was forced to abdicate I think that Rasputin was the only things that was keeping him in power in the first place and after he died there was no one that he could trust to help him. 3. In August 1914 war broke out in Europe. Russia and her allies Britain and France faced Germany and Austria-Hungary. All over Russia most people were in favour of the war 'For Faith, Tsar and Country'. Love of Russia matched their fear and hatred of the Germans. The whole of Russia was on fire with war but on the other hand they were very nervous. They were wondering what would happen to them if the Germans did take over. A few Russians feared that the war might signify the end of the Tsar's rule over Russia. One of these few was Rasputin who sent the Tsar a telegram in 1914 that said that if war broke out he would fall from power. ...read more.

Conclusion

He had very little support from the Tsar. By March 1917 the Tsar had lost all of the support of the Russian people who had backed him and the war in 1914. Rodzianko told the Tsar that he had pleaded with him not to take overall charge of the war and now that he had all the blame was falling on to him. The Tsar was in danger, for it seemed he might force his subjects to choose between you and the good of the country. In March a food riot began in St Petersburg. This led quickly to the fall of the Tsar. The Tsar did not want to abdicate he wanted to return to the capital and take control but the rail was blocked and at last he accepted that he had little choice but to abdicate. I believe that the most important reason for the downfall of the Tsar was that he went to take control of the army and therefore put himself in the fire if it all went wrong. I think that leaving Alexandra and Rasputin in charge meant that he lost the respect and love of the people. He really didn't know what he was doing as commander and should have left it to the professionals. He also rejected the advice of Rasputin and of the Duma not to go and they predicted what would happen and he was aware of this as they told in letters from Rasputin and The Duma but he still refused to take any notice of them and just went of on his own. This was the key reason why Nicholas II was forced to abdicate and ended the 300-year-old Tsarist dynasty of the Romanovs. Thomas Henesey ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    would have been discontented by posters such as source G, which they would believe to be true. People were used to doing what the Tsar said, through bad times and good. They never saw the possibility that there was another way.

  2. Why was the Tsar Forced to Abdicate in 1917?

    They soon began to support other parties. This meant the Tsar lost one of his most vital support groups, and chaos soon followed. Another factor that contributed to the revolution was the rumours about the Tsarina and Rasputin, a Russian healer who appeared to cure the Tsar's son of haemophilia.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    All the sources are published by the USSR, Briton, or America all with a negative view about Stalin and his policies. The ones by the USSR are all exaggerated with many contradictions such as in source D Stalin talks about the need to care and be more considerate to one

  2. Investigate the changes that took place in Horsforth between 1700 and 1900

    a factory there in 1851, this is backed up by the 1851 map where there is no sign of a factory. Also accommodation for factory workers(Fink Hill terraces) were not there until after the industrial revolution(as proven by the diagrams of typical pre and post industrial revolution houses).

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Alongside US imperialism, the USSR had emerged from the war as a world superpower. "World history knows nothing like it," states Nove. As early as 1953, the USSR had built up a stock of 1.3 million machine tools of all kinds - double what it had prewar.

  2. In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on ...

    Instead of making profits by selling their grain at market, peasants would sell their grain to the government at a fixed low price. They would receive wages for their work. Collective farms consisted of 50 to 100 families, together farming an average 450 hectares of land.

  1. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia? ...

    The Tsar gave the public a false impression of change by issuing the October Manifesto which not only said that Russia could have an elected parliament but also allowed people basic rights, such as the right to form political parties.

  2. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    The Germans, on the other hand, had less than 20,000 casualties and captured over 500 guns. Rather than report this to the Tsar, General Samsonov shot himself.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work