• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  • Level: GCSE
  • Subject: History
  • Document length: 1439 words

I will explain how Carson, Craig and the Ulster Unionists were opposed to the Home Rule bill, and how they felt they were justified in using armed force if necessary, to get what they believe was their right to a British government for Ireland.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Carson, Craig and their 'Loyalist Unionist supporters' Feel justified in using violence and the threat of violence against 'Their Kings government' between 1912 and 1914 in order to prevent Home Rule for Ireland? Throughout this essay I will explain how Carson, Craig and the Ulster Unionists were opposed to the Home Rule bill, and how they felt they were justified in using armed force if necessary, to get what they believe was their right to a British government for Ireland. I will also detail some background on each Carson and Craig. Edward Carson was described as the founding father of Northern Ireland, he was a protestant Dubliner and became the acknowledged leader of the Ulster Unionists due to his efforts to keep the six northern counties under British rule. Carson dedicated his political life to opposing the Irish Home Rule and was prepared to use immeasurable force, if necessary, to prevent the Home Rule bill being passed. James Craig was born in Belfast and had a very strict Presbyterian upbringing, which led him to totally distrust any Northern Irish Catholics. Like Carson he also dedicated his life to upholding the Union of the north. In 1910 he became the leader of the Ulster Unionists, but was more widely known for his other interests and leadership was not his main agenda so he ceded the leadership to Edward Carson. ...read more.

Middle

A decision which in due course was to transform Irish politics, Again this was found justifiable as the Monster meetings were paying little effect on the British ministers and this was to add additional pressure on the British government, using possible force to resist an all Ireland government. By 1914, 90,000 volunteers had enlisted and although their were well trained, they were inadequately armed, which brought about the Larne gun running in where the Unionist leaders purchased in total 25,000 rifles and 3 million rounds of ammunition. This again was able to exert more pressure on the Liberal government. The 'Extra Parliamentary' opposition to the Home Rule was justified by the Loyalist/Unionist camps on the basis of the 'Social Contract Theory' which had two basic rules, We must not harm one another and we must be able to rely on each other. They also felt that the 'Act of Unionism' meant that they were entitled to an implicit guarantee that the West Minister Parliament and their Monarch would protect 'their civil and religious liberties' of Loyalist in Ireland. One of the main barriers to previous Home Rules was that of the House of Lords, but in 1911 the 'Parliament Act' effectively reduced their power to delay as opposed to outright rejection. The leader of the I.P.P. ...read more.

Conclusion

So the Home Rule bill was deferred until the war was over, this then was to lead to the Easter Rising of 1916. Craig applied for the enlisted for the army to fight for the British, he was not accepted due to medical reasons, although he did work for several government posts in the duration of the war. Carson was later to become a Law Lord, he did state very bitterly, "What a fool I was! I was only a puppet and so was Ulster, and so was Ireland, in the political game that was to get the Conservative party into power.......these terms were not passed on their merits. Not at all. They were passed with a revolver to your heads. And you know it...I ask your Lordships, ought Unionists leaders to have been a party to that-Unionists leaders who have undertaking to defend the Unionist policy? Of all the men in my experience that I think the most loathsome it is those who will sell their friends for the purpose of conciliating their enemies. Ulster could not have been saved for the British crown, if it weren't for the determination of the Unionist and Carson's inspiring leadership. Ultimately it was the threat of the armed defiance from the Ulster Unionist. Carson's perennial question is still repeated, "Will liberal-minded governments ever learn that submission to lawlessness, so far from appeasing, only whets the appetite in Ireland. 1389 Words. Liz Dalzell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. "Why were Ulster Unionists so determined to resist home rule for Ireland in the ...

    In the south of Ireland there were 250,000 Unionists, mainly Anglican land owners, and if Home Rule was passed these Unionists would no longer be able to give support to Ulster as they would be massively overcome by the Irish Nationalists and the Catholics.

  2. The 1913 lockout, 1916 rising, the treaty of 1921 and the causes of the ...

    taken by everyone at the church door the next Sunday; "Denying the right of the British government to enforce compulsory service in this country, we pledge ourselves solemnly to one another to resist conscription by the most effective means at our disposal".

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    And that's when the democratic mandate really begins to go into play. That's when they realize that they have to play the electoral role as well. So, what you find is with the election of Bobby Sands, and following his death and the bi-election, the election of another Republican, is the sovereignty changes to electoral ...

  2. By 1914, who had the greater success, Irish Nationalists or Ulster Unionists?

    The 60 votes of the Irish MPs were important to the other larger political parties, and William Gladstone, leader of the Liberal party on becoming Prime minister, announced his mission was to pacify Ireland. Being a man of high morals and religious convictions, he believed that he could bring peace to the troubled island.

  1. What Were the Characteristics of Ulster Unionism From the 1880's Until The Partition?

    "In the demands for home rule, and amidst the overriding power of the Catholic church, unionists could see little which appealed to them" (Mike Burn). Gladstone's home rule spurned an alliance between the forces of British conservatism and that of Ulster Unionism.

  2. Why did the Liberals fail to get Home Rule before 1914?

    This time the Bill had every chance of being passed, with a enough people in favour of the Bill in the Commons, and the Lords with only the power to delay it for two years. The Bill made provision for a two chamber Irish Parliament with control over Ireland in

  1. How successful were the British Government in brining peace to Ireland?

    peace to Ireland because Margaret Thatcher was afraid that the increase in violence was due to an increase in ordinary Catholics voting for Sinn Fein and his violent methods. However Unionists felt betrayed and angered by the agreement as they felt that the republic would have a say in how

  2. Northern Ireland Essay

    In 1690, Williams's army defeated James at the battle of the Boyne. This is still remembered today and is a yearly celebration event for the Protestants against the Catholics. A year later the war was ended by the treaty of limerick.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work