• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I will look at whether or not the actions of the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign of the votes for women.The sources I will be examining is a very wide range of sources from many different perspectives

Extracts from this document...


During the period up to 1918 many women in England campaigned for the vote for themselves. Many people joined this campaign, joining either the suffragists or the suffragettes, the more militant organisation. I will look at whether or not the actions of the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign of the votes for women. The sources I will be examining is a very wide range of sources from many different perspectives and so must be looked at carefully. An interesting source to begin with is source C. It was written by a women who has worked hard for women's equality and used to be a suffragette herself. She left the suffragettes because she believed that the Pankhursts were arrogant middle class women who were turning the focus away from actual women's equality and concentrating on getting the vote as their only goal. She also believes that the working classes have been excluded and alienated by the Pankhursts from the movement when it was they who started it in the first place, "It has gradually edged the working class element out of the ranks." She uses a lot of emotive language to describe the suffragettes in this piece, "Socially exclusive, punctiliously correct." ...read more.


She talks about the Second World War being a crucial factor in the victory for the vote, "Undoubtedly the large part taken by women during the war . . .". She also mentions the threat of revolution at the time as a factor in the suffragette's success, that the pressure of communism and change, "reverberating from Russia across Europe," could have been a deciding factor in the minds of politicians. She warns that the militant campaign would return if they were ignored. This is an important point, as the government would have needed women to help re-build the country after the war. Sources J and I are both government documents referring to the suffragette's campaign. Source I is a record of a debate in the House of Lords, one of the views is shared with the previous source that the pre-war violence will once again return to Britain if this problem is not properly addressed. He is afraid that the politicians against the suffragettes could be murdered, "if any of our colleges had taken a prominent line either for or against the grant of the vote to women had been assassinated in the street." He states that there have been no murders so far but that the, "Invincible wing," the radicals of the party, would act and cross that line. ...read more.


Other sources would have to be studied before I could come to any sort of conclusion. The source written by Pugh entitled "Votes for Women" clearly argues that the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign for the women's vote in Britain, "militant methods fail to shake the government's view on suffrage,". Many aspects of his argument are relevant, however, it was the militant actions of the suffragettes that did indeed propel their cause into the headlines and kept it there for a long time. Although the government could not give into to the militant campaign at the time, after it ceased during the war they were given the goal that they had waited on for so long, the vote for women. This would not have been possible without the actions of the suffragettes, which made the government see that women really were serious about their campaign. Many of these sources were very diverse in that they give a lot of different views and many of them come from sources that may seen not to be reliable historical evidence. So, other sources would have to be studied on the subject before a clear and concise conclusion can be reached answering the question, did the suffragettes harm their own campaign. ?? ?? ?? ?? Phil Durrant Women Sources Essay - 1 - Word Count: 1,283 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig in sources

    So he never knew what it was like, Haigs plans were to relocate his mains forces to another British front and leave a sufficient force to secure the ground gained. He did not kept do those plans but kept attacking for 100 days of stalemate, he was sending young men

  2. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    This dealt a serious blow to the success of assimilation. Britain's poor white population was a target of false propaganda and politicians like Enoch Powell persuaded them that immigrants were the cause for their problems. Enoch Powell's river of blood speech was recently used by the BNP a racist group who doesn't believe in immigrants and assimilation.

  1. How far do these sources suggest that the militant campaigns of the suffragettes obstructed ...

    this scene going on, firstly we don't see why this woman has been arrested and secondly where are the rest of the women and what are they doing. And again like in source A it shows that the WSPU have caused havoc in someway for one of their members to

  2. What can you learn from source A about the reasons given by the Suffragettes ...

    In 1906 - 1908, a split within the WSPU forming the suffragettes and the suffragists, which introduced more violent campaigns, showing lack of cooperation in the movement. In 1908, there were attacks on the new Prime Minister, Herbert Asquith who was against the vote for women.

  1. I intend to examine the circumstances that led to a campaign for votes for ...

    In conclusion, all of the factors contributed to a general feeling of dissatisfaction among women. Which lead them to gather and begin an organised campaign for the vote. Question 2 I intend to examine the differences between the methods used by the National Union Of Suffrage Societies (NUWSS), who were

  2. The Suffragettes.

    Violence was clearly the most publicized and frequent method of campaigning. But other method the suffragettes used included: * Public rallies and campaigns * Posters and cartoons * Political meetings and leaflets * Banners and shouting * Hunger strikes (the cat and mouse act)

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    Thousands of new members there was increasing violence. In this year the Suffragettes also gained their first martyr where Emily Davidson was killed when she ran in front of the King's horse at the Derby. All the following activities to the government must have seemed to be the start of a revolution.

  2. Why did a campaign for Women’s suffrage develop in the years after 1870?

    This annoyed the suffragists. The suffragettes began to change their tactics. This wasn't helped by the response of the Prime Minister at the time, Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman. He agreed with the arguments but proposed no improvements. He urged the women "to go on pestering" and to exercise 'the virtue of patience'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work