• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I will look at whether or not the actions of the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign of the votes for women.The sources I will be examining is a very wide range of sources from many different perspectives

Extracts from this document...


During the period up to 1918 many women in England campaigned for the vote for themselves. Many people joined this campaign, joining either the suffragists or the suffragettes, the more militant organisation. I will look at whether or not the actions of the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign of the votes for women. The sources I will be examining is a very wide range of sources from many different perspectives and so must be looked at carefully. An interesting source to begin with is source C. It was written by a women who has worked hard for women's equality and used to be a suffragette herself. She left the suffragettes because she believed that the Pankhursts were arrogant middle class women who were turning the focus away from actual women's equality and concentrating on getting the vote as their only goal. She also believes that the working classes have been excluded and alienated by the Pankhursts from the movement when it was they who started it in the first place, "It has gradually edged the working class element out of the ranks." She uses a lot of emotive language to describe the suffragettes in this piece, "Socially exclusive, punctiliously correct." ...read more.


She talks about the Second World War being a crucial factor in the victory for the vote, "Undoubtedly the large part taken by women during the war . . .". She also mentions the threat of revolution at the time as a factor in the suffragette's success, that the pressure of communism and change, "reverberating from Russia across Europe," could have been a deciding factor in the minds of politicians. She warns that the militant campaign would return if they were ignored. This is an important point, as the government would have needed women to help re-build the country after the war. Sources J and I are both government documents referring to the suffragette's campaign. Source I is a record of a debate in the House of Lords, one of the views is shared with the previous source that the pre-war violence will once again return to Britain if this problem is not properly addressed. He is afraid that the politicians against the suffragettes could be murdered, "if any of our colleges had taken a prominent line either for or against the grant of the vote to women had been assassinated in the street." He states that there have been no murders so far but that the, "Invincible wing," the radicals of the party, would act and cross that line. ...read more.


Other sources would have to be studied before I could come to any sort of conclusion. The source written by Pugh entitled "Votes for Women" clearly argues that the suffragettes harmed rather than aided the campaign for the women's vote in Britain, "militant methods fail to shake the government's view on suffrage,". Many aspects of his argument are relevant, however, it was the militant actions of the suffragettes that did indeed propel their cause into the headlines and kept it there for a long time. Although the government could not give into to the militant campaign at the time, after it ceased during the war they were given the goal that they had waited on for so long, the vote for women. This would not have been possible without the actions of the suffragettes, which made the government see that women really were serious about their campaign. Many of these sources were very diverse in that they give a lot of different views and many of them come from sources that may seen not to be reliable historical evidence. So, other sources would have to be studied on the subject before a clear and concise conclusion can be reached answering the question, did the suffragettes harm their own campaign. ?? ?? ?? ?? Phil Durrant Women Sources Essay - 1 - Word Count: 1,283 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    had fought before the war, no one would have taken the cause seriously, and the government would have kept on postponing their decision, as they believed that it was not an important decision to be put forward in parliament. The violence that was taken by these women was irresponsible but showed that they meant what they said.

  2. The Suffragettes.

    of feeding, they look concerned and yet angry and the lady for letting herself get like this. The nurses all look bewildered and concerned. 5C) Force-feeding I believe didn't help the women. Yes it kept them alive, but they didn't want to be feed so if they want to die of starvation it was their own choice.

  1. Haig in sources

    to their deaths, Britain suffered 420,000 casualties, and nearly 20,000 were killed on the first day alone. Enormous courage was shown by the soldiers but betrayed by the leaders. "Lions led by Donkeys". 3. Study Sources D and E What do you think Haig expected to happen on the first day of the Somme?

  2. How far do these sources suggest that the militant campaigns of the suffragettes obstructed ...

    be arrested, the obstructs there promotion of the franchise because it shows that at the time the main way the WSPU are trying to the get the right to vote is by causing vandalism, thus trying to frighten the government into submission.

  1. Why did a campaign for women's suffrage develop in the years after 1870?

    Working men had the vote, even some non-working men, and they had a say in how their taxes were spent. Convicts and the poorest men living on the bread line without jobs could even vote in general elections, and they were not even paying taxes.

  2. What can you learn from source A about the reasons given by the Suffragettes ...

    and had not been so violent, the government may have not thought twice about giving women the vote. I also don't think the main reason is the force-feeding or the hunger strikes because if anything this got the Suffragettes the sympathy vote from the general public.

  1. I intend to examine the circumstances that led to a campaign for votes for ...

    The Suffragists sent out pamphlets to many homes in England as a means of educating and persuading people to think like them. They held meetings in factories during the lunch-hours so they could tell working women of the rights they could have.

  2. Votes For Women, 1908-12 Sources Question

    I think that source C shows the wider view of all women who wanted the vote as it merely states that it is important that they had the vote and says that it need not interfere with their domestic duties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work