• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Illustrate and examine the motives of Bernal Diaz' The Conquest of New Spain and Bartolome de Las Casas' An Account, Much Abbreviated, of the Destruction of the Indies.

Extracts from this document...


This essay will illustrate and examine the motives of Bernal Diaz' The Conquest of New Spain and Bartolome de Las Casas' An Account, Much Abbreviated, of the Destruction of the Indies. Furthermore, a conclusion regarding the value of information will be conveyed. Bernal Diaz del Castillo wrote his account of the conquest of Mexico while an old man because he felt that many of the works concerning the conflict exhibited a negative and skewed misrepresentation of not only the expedition, but of Hernando Cortes as well. It is also possible to assume that Diaz was equally concerned with rebutting the writings of Bartolome de Las Casas and the latter's account of the conquest. As an eyewitness to the actual Conquest of New Spain, it is often assumed that Bernal Diaz's account of the event is one of rare and credible pieces surrounding the event. Moreover, this extract enables us to analyze and explain particular historical questions we should not, without discrediting Diaz, immediately assume its reliability without criticism. Las Casas, on the other hand, writes his report based on a second or third account of the events which occurred. That is not to say it is less accurate. However, the number of "filters" the information had to go through could have jeopardized its authenticity. ...read more.


A major theme develops throughout his account - the use of manipulation. Diaz reveals Cortes' heroism and leadership and both these qualities flourished out of his main objective. This objective was to manipulate Indians and rule over their large nation by eliminating their head of state, Montezuma. Bartolome de Las Casas' abbreviated account provides the reader of all the atrocities committed by the Spaniards to the innocent Indians. In descriptive detail, he outlines how thousands were not only treated as animals and used for slaves, but also how the women were treated as sexual vessels. Killings were deemed as a necessary evil and thousands (possibly embellished) executed or mutilated without the slightest bit of remorse. Although his depiction of the events may be skewed and filtered from a second or third-hand account, one theme emerges from his writings - a theme of fear. Las Casas does mention how the main reason or purpose for the expedition was Christianize the polytheists, their savage treatment and killing of the Indians truly exhibited how fear was their main tool to accomplish this task. These killings were aided by the use of guns and horses, but most importantly, as allowing the Indians to interpret the Spaniards as devils or gods that were part of their polytheistic religion. An example of how Diaz' theme of manipulation and Las Casas' theme of fear becomes translucent is when the Spaniards arrive at Cholula, a state of the Aztecs. ...read more.


Bartolome de Las Casas is not excluded from this bias. He is not writing from first-hand experience. Moreover, his heavily Christian views provide a drastically skewed account of the Conquest. It is much harder to find the true, historical core through his many filters. When it is found, it is very succinct. Lastly, both writers are men. Their prejudice and unfairness toward focusing on the male-centered activities and events leave the historian with little information about roles and responsibilities woman and children had during the transpiring events. After reading and comparing the Conquest according to Bernal Diaz and Bartolome de Las Casas, the amateur historian should have attained a few important lessons. One must establish who is writing the account and where the information was ascertained - establishing whether it was a first hand account or passed on from explorers or missionaries are vitally important. The audience and purpose of the historian is also a key factor in studying historical articles. By knowing the historians purpose and what s/he hopes to accomplish helps to explain why certain information may be excluded, or even embellished. Multiple sources are another fundamental dynamic. By collaborating different accounts, a true and pure historical core and emerge from varying reports. The culture and religious identity of the historian also informs the reader of certain biases that may exist, since the historian may force contemporary or extraneous ideologies into their account. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What were the motives of the terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks on ...

    Jesus died, the home to Mohammed and the location of the temple of Solomon. As a result the Jews and Muslims create war over Israel as they both believe the land is more sacred to them. Furthermore, AL Qaeda's extreme belief in Religion meant that the hijackers believed they were

  2. What were the motives of the attackers of 9/11

    As Iraq invaded Kuwait however, both America and Saudi Arabia realised they could not afford to lose Kuwait. Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi politician and leader of Al Qaeda, then offered Kuwait thousands of Saudi troops to help fight the Iraqis.

  1. Roosevelt's New Deal

    ASSIGNMENT B: OBJECTIVE 3 WAS THE NEW DEAL A SUCCESS? 1. Study Source A. Use Source A and your knowledge of the period to explain why people supported Roosevelt in the 1932 election. Source A is from a speech by Roosevelt during his election campaign in 1932.

  2. What was the Purpose and Nature of the Final Solution?

    Source three comes from "Public Opinion Under Nazism" by David Bankier (1992). This source suggests that although the "Final Solution" was a closely guarded secret, it was said that some of the Nazi soldiers would openly boast and brag about the liquidation of Jews.

  1. The Other Side of the Destruction

    Clearly, he was trying to attract pity and attention to his cause, but at the same time his descriptions of the Indians make them look more stupid than simple. By setting no boundaries for the impotence and submissiveness of the invaded, Las Casas exaggerates more than what his readers could buy.

  2. Was the 'rise of the Netherlands' a symptom or a cause of the 'decline ...

    This war is, of course, an explicit cause of Spain's decline, as it drained finance out of Spain's coffers and seriously damaged the country's reputaci´┐Żn. A final war at the time was in Mantua, which coincided with the end of a 12-year truce with the United Provinces.

  1. Greek Gods and Goddesses

    (Hamilton 27-28) He was portrayed as a man with less serene features, a thick beard, and disorderly hair. (Guirand 151) Hades was also the son of Cronus and Rhea. When Zeus took over as the Supreme Ruler from his father, he divided the world giving the Underworld to Hades.

  2. What methods have been used to portray the historical interaction between the Europeans and ...

    The literature also has a plethora of quotes from the native people included in it. These quotes show two things, both truthful; the first is that the Indians thought that what the Europeans were doing to them was horrific. The second is that Europeans thought that it was acceptable to do what they were doing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work