• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In 1915, Kitchener's 'New Army' of the British Empire took over many sectors on the Western front.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jimmy Hamilton VM History Coursework Task 1. In 1915, Kitchener's 'New Army' of the British Empire took over many sectors on the Western front. One of these sectors was the area North of the River Somme in France. At this time, this part of the front was relatively quiet, with hardly any fighting. However, allied generals had decided this would be the area where a great offensive would break through German lines and win the war. In 1916, the German army launched massive attacks against the French fortresses at Verdun. Verdun was of great symbolic importance to the French, as it was their country's symbol of military strength. In order to relieve pressure on the French fighting at Verdun, it soon became highly important for a British offensive. Plans had been made for an attack around the Somme area, but they were originally intended for an Anglo-French army. The proposed time for the offensive would have been later in the year, as Kitchener's volunteer army needed time to train for battle, although the troops arriving to fight at the Somme had received inadequate training. ...read more.

Middle

This bombardment would destroy German machine gun posts and would kill any German soldiers in the trenches. This was to take place for the first two days of the bombardment. In the three days following this, the RAF's spotting aircraft would mark the positions of any German heavy artillery thus allowing the British guns to destroy any enemy artillery that would decimate their men. Any fortified villages would also be obliterated by the bombardment. A five day bombardment was planned, although this was extended by two days, so the day of infantry attack was changed from June 29th to July 1st. The final stage of the bombardment would take place as the troops began attacking when the artillery would use an early form of creeping barrage. They would fire on the first line of German trenches for a set period of time, then they would target the German second line and keep moving in this pattern, the idea was to fire on the trenches that the British troops were attacking in order to support them, then to lift the barrage at the time when the British troops were scheduled to arrive. ...read more.

Conclusion

Men were sent in four waves, because in the past battles with four waves of men had usually been won. The infantry had been told that the German trenches would be destroyed by the bombardment, and all they had to do was walk through enemy territory capturing territory and prisoners while the Germans retreated before them. Some were told they would not need their rifles. This method of infantry advance was expected to work because the cornerstone of Haig's plan was an accurate bombardment that would devastate the German sto such an extent that they would not be able to resist. His final touch to the plan was his favourite method of attack. Haig had been trained as a cavalry officer, and he firmly believed that the only way to win a war was to break enemy lines with infantry and send cavalry pouring through the gap. This was what he intended to do on the Somme. After the infantry had opened a gap in the German lines, he would send regiments of cavalry through the gap to round up the German lines and win the war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    The Turks did not beat us - we were beaten by our own High Command"11. This source clearly shows that some of the soldiers believed that they were being killed as a result of the Generals that were commanding the expedition in tents on the beach, several miles away.

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    Although Salisbury said this and wrote memo against entanglements with other countries, was he able to have complete avoidance from entanglements? The answer is NO, and there are examples: a. 1887 the Mediterranean Agreements - there were two agreements: i)

  1. haig coursework

    This suggests that the British General who wrote source G believed that Haig was a strong commander and liked the way he conducted his plans and did not change them along the way. This refers to the fact that Haig's purpose, at the battle of the Somme in 1916, was

  2. The Battle of Verdun.

    appear otherwise ' By any reasonable standard the Germans had won at the point that they wound down the offensive' but a major weakness of this viewpoint and of the source is his lack of evidence. From my own knowledge I know that there was a lot of propaganda used

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    First aid was sent down through the communication trenches. Soldiers who were seriously injured were sent to the Casualty Clearing Station. Soldiers were safe there because they were quite far away from the fighting. There were also doctors and nurses there to help them get better. Some soldiers were taken to Base Hospitals by train.

  2. The Western Front

    Second Battle of the Marne 15 July-4 Aug 1918: This battle formed the final thrust of the German Spring Offensive of 1918. General Erich von Ludendorff threw 35 divisions across the Marne, planning to encircle Reims. The French were prepared for the attack, with four armies under good generals, together

  1. The New Deal

    as a result of this world trade ended. Many people were made unemployed, therefore people lost their savings and the USA, and this shows that they could not create wealth and an end to poverty just by trading goods. People began to lose hope and confidence and they desperately needed a new/ better president.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Captains or Generals on the ground could not go against their direct orders, even when it was inevitable that they would fail, later on during the war, more responsibilities were given to the ground troops. For instance if they saw that something was not going to go as planned then they could question or call off the attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work