In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on Russia and its people. The short-term and long-term affects of his changes to Russia will be analysed and how they affected the Russian people.

Authors Avatar

History Coursework Part A: Question 3

In this essay I am going to asses the impact that Stalin had on Russia and its people. The short-term and long-term affects of his changes to Russia will be analysed and how they affected the Russian people. I will begin my essay with an introduction to Stalin and his rise from a revolutionary to the leader of nation.

Joseph Djugashvili (Stalin’s real name), was born in eastern Georgia in 1879; his father was a cobbler and his mother a peasant. They were poor and Stalin had a rough childhood. He did well at school and gained a scholarship to a seminary where he was first introduced to Marxism. From then on he became involved in the underground world of revolutionaries, writing pamphlets and attending secret meetings. He greatly admired the writings of Lenin. Joseph soon became an active revolutionary and became involved in a number of activities to raise funds for the Bolsheviks. He became harder as the years past, especially after the death of his first wife in 1909. In the prison camps (Stalin was often arrested and sent into exile in Siberia) he gained the name of Stalin which means “man of steel”. When the Revolution of March 1917 broke out, Stalin hurried back to Petrograd and was made editor of Pravda. After the November Revolution he was made Commissar for nationalities. In 1922 he was appointed the Party’s first General Secretary, in charge of general organization. As General Secretary of the Communist Party Stalin was very powerful and worked fervently to eliminate his opposition and to become leader of the party. However in May 1924, something happened which made Stalin’s position weak in the party and it was the reading of Lenin’s Testament to the Central Committee of the Communist Party:

“Comrade Stalin, having become General Secretary, has great power concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure that he always knows how to use that power with sufficient caution.

Later he added:

“Stalin is too rude and this fault…becomes unacceptable in the office of General Secretary. Therefore, I propose to the comrades that a way be found to remove Stalin from that post and replace him with someone who differs from Stalin in all respects, someone more patient, more loyal, more polite, more considerate”

(S.H.P Source 1 Page 82)

.

This was a great blow to Stalin’s position in the party but fortunately for him the Committee decided against publishing the Testament and Lenin’s comments were ignored in order to prevent Stalin from being embarrassed. After recovering from this incident, Stalin first joined forces with the Rightists who were Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky (who wanted to continue Lenin’s New Economic Policy) to get rid of Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev, who were the Left Opposition (they didn’t want to continue the NEP but wanted to industrialize Russia to make it stronger). Sure enough with the help of the Rightists Stalin would manage to succeed in driving out the Left Opposition which contained his most fierce opponent and his biggest threat to becoming leader of the party; Trotsky. At the end of 1925 Stalin’s position was strengthened when the Party Congress elected three of his old friends to the Politburo. With their help Stalin was able to secure the dismissal of Trotsky, Kameneve and Zinoviev. Now that Stalin had got rid of Trotsky and his supporters, he turned against the Rightists who wanted to continue with the NEP. Bukharin and the Rightists tried to argue against Stalin’s decision to end the NEP but their arguments fell on deaf ears and in 1929 they too resigned from their position. Meanwhile in 1928, Trotsky had been deported to Alma Ata in Soviet Central Asia, and in 1929 he was exiled from the USSR altogether. Stalin then became the supreme leader of the USSR.

Early in 1928 Stalin announced that the USSR was 2 million tones short of the minimum amount of grain needed for feeding the workers in the cities. In other words, there was going to be a famine in the cities. Stalin tried solving the problem with emergency measures. Police squads went into the country areas to make raids on farms. Food in the cities was strictly rationed. But these measures were not enough. In 1929 Stalin announced a more radical solution to the problem; farms were to be a ‘collectivised’.  This was a very controversial decision and it meant the end of the small, individual, old fashioned farms owned by the peasants. In each area, peasants were to pool their fields, their horses and their tools ad work together on a kolkhoz – a collective farm. Instead of making profits by selling their grain at market, peasants would sell their grain to the government at a fixed low price. They would receive wages for their work.

Collective farms consisted of 50 to 100 families, together farming an average 450 hectares of land. The collective farm was intended to be more efficient than the old individual farms.

As a result of Stalin’s decision of collectivization, there was fierce resistance to it. Peasants refused to hand over their animals, preferring to slaughter them and eat or sell the meat. They burnt crops, tools and houses rather than hand them over to the state. There were also riots and armed resistance. One riot lasted five days and armored cars were needed to put it down. This fierce reaction made Stalin call a temporary halt to collectivization. He was worried that there would be no crop harvest in the summer. He tried to shift the responsibility for such wide spread violence and blamed the activists and local officials for going too far. But as soon as the harvest was gathered in, the process was begun again, a little more slowly but just as much violence.

Join now!

In 1930, bands of Party activists and officials, backed up by the state police, were sent to the countryside to organize peasants into collective farms. If the peasants refused to join the collective, they would be labeled Kulaks (rich peasants) and shot, deported or sent to labour camps. Sometimes whole villages were deported as lessons to others. ‘Dekulakisation’ was central to the collectivisation process. However even where Kulaks did not exist the Communists still insisted that they had to be found and cleaned out. Stalin used class hatred to whip up hysteria. The district authorities told local Soviets how many ...

This is a preview of the whole essay