• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain? Through out the blitz the government was determined to maintain the high morale of the British people and attempt to portray a sense of normality through the media. This was realised before war was even declared with secret meetings being held between the director general of the BBC and the cabinet office and it was then decided that in the event of war broadcasts should report "Truthfully and accurately, but not in such detail as to endanger the civilian population or jeopardise operations.". Censorship was not only important to ensure the public were not bombarded by tragic news; but also to prevent the enemy from discovering which targets had been most successful. By diluting or entirely withholding information to the public whilst remaining in the above guideline the civilian morale remained high. The government worked in co-operation with the BBC realising that it could be the voice of the cabinet as long as it was incorporated under Royal Charter, controlling the public's mind set. The government ensure that any news source reporting directly to the public was censored with the help of the Minister of Information. An example of the government attempting to hide the effects of the Blitz was when Coventry was horrifically bombed. ...read more.


Posters were the government's cheap source of powerful communication. They could continually and effectively blast the public with messages and short phrases which could then be more fully explained over the radio.. An example of this is the "Dig for Victory" campaign which the BBC encouraged with Radio Broadcasts on vegetables in the garden and their uses. Campaigns like this and others where railing were taken down and donated form the public for the war effort but were actually never used were used solely to make Citizens feel like they were doing their bit united. Throughout the war the most public communication tool was the radio. Nearly every home in Britain had access to Radio broadcasts at this time - and so the Government could easily broadcast messages to the masses. The government created propaganda broadcasts; carefully selecting the vocabulary used in each to incite different emotions. "Collateral damage" for example was used to describe death of civilians, this term is more clinical, and does encourages detachment of emotion. Programmes were broadcast for all ages; for children there were stories broadcast and for adults as well as news there were also broadcasts from famous performers and heroes of the entertainment industry performing over the radio. Information submitted by government for inclusion in bulletins was often extremely biased. ...read more.


This shows how strongly the citizens looked to their neighbours for how to respond. When surrounded by others crying, screaming and trembling all over, they reacted similarly, before then, however, they had coped better. The Government worked hard to ensure the delicate balance between ensuring the truth was not kept from the public, because this would have caused the public to disbelieve what they saw. News is passed in other ways than through the media which can be censored. Word of mouth would have meant people could hear of the atrocities occurring (for example, in Coventry) however, by mentioning it in a positive light (showing people re-building) and not in a negative, destructive way, the people did not realise that the censorship was occurring In conclusion, I think that the quick governmental realisation of the use of media to maintain morale had an essential role in the war effort. Essentially they assessed every avenue of communication with the public and ensured that there were appropriate measures in place to make sure that only the government's message was given to the people. The people of Britian would have been aware of the effects of the Blitz, particularly if they were living in London or another city directly being attacked, but through watching the reactions of other people through the media, they were informed in how to respond. . William Pate CAND No. 5181 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women & the British Car Industry

    Question 3 - Collection B and C Look carefully at the sources in collection B and collection C together. How useful are the sources in Collection C in adding to the understanding that you have already gained from Collection B about the roles of women in the car industry?

  2. Battle Of Britain - The Popular Myth

    Hitler did not want to invade Britain, as there would have been a considerable loss of men, which he needed to help with the invasion of Russia. Hitler made several tactical miscalculations, which still remain a mystery to people today.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the response of the British people ...

    Source D supports the evidence of Source B because they are both pictures of the actual war and the devastation the air raids caused, but Source C is a piece of propaganda so it is misleading evidence because it is posed and fake.

  2. "The British government protected its civilians very effectively from the effects of air-raids" - ...

    probably did not know as much as people would have originally thought. Fourthly, the government introduced the act known as the 'Blackout'. This was the process of the British nation basically closing the curtains, turning off their lights, and not using their cars etc.

  1. 'In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the ...

    It did not work though. The British people found the broadcasts funny. They believed the BBC and Winston Churchill over Joyce. Anybody who seemed as if they would broadcast material that would demoralise the public was banned. J.B. Priestley was one such person. He became too political so he was banned as the government feared people would become demoralised.


    The fact that the Air-wardens remained to their duties and are working together shows "unity". This is supported by the fact that a sense of unity was created through the shared realization that the bombs would not discriminate- such as the bombing of the Buckingham Palace and the same ration that the rich and the poor received.

  1. 3) In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of ...

    from Dunkirk, he gave a talk which more than anything else helped to create the 'myth' of Dunkirk as an heroic success. Public information leaflets were produced to tell people what action to take and also gave advice on how to save to help the war effort.

  2. In what ways did the British Government attempt to hide the effects of the ...

    This was an attempt to lower British morale. On the other hand, any evidence of heroism or morale was selected to be used on the radio, in documentaries or in the newspaper in an attempt to endorse good spirit. An example of this is the picture of St Paul's Cathedral standing strong surrounded by clouds and flames.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work