• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain?

Extracts from this document...


In what ways did the British government attempt to hide the effects of the Blitz from the people of Britain? Through out the blitz the government was determined to maintain the high morale of the British people and attempt to portray a sense of normality through the media. This was realised before war was even declared with secret meetings being held between the director general of the BBC and the cabinet office and it was then decided that in the event of war broadcasts should report "Truthfully and accurately, but not in such detail as to endanger the civilian population or jeopardise operations.". Censorship was not only important to ensure the public were not bombarded by tragic news; but also to prevent the enemy from discovering which targets had been most successful. By diluting or entirely withholding information to the public whilst remaining in the above guideline the civilian morale remained high. The government worked in co-operation with the BBC realising that it could be the voice of the cabinet as long as it was incorporated under Royal Charter, controlling the public's mind set. The government ensure that any news source reporting directly to the public was censored with the help of the Minister of Information. An example of the government attempting to hide the effects of the Blitz was when Coventry was horrifically bombed. ...read more.


Posters were the government's cheap source of powerful communication. They could continually and effectively blast the public with messages and short phrases which could then be more fully explained over the radio.. An example of this is the "Dig for Victory" campaign which the BBC encouraged with Radio Broadcasts on vegetables in the garden and their uses. Campaigns like this and others where railing were taken down and donated form the public for the war effort but were actually never used were used solely to make Citizens feel like they were doing their bit united. Throughout the war the most public communication tool was the radio. Nearly every home in Britain had access to Radio broadcasts at this time - and so the Government could easily broadcast messages to the masses. The government created propaganda broadcasts; carefully selecting the vocabulary used in each to incite different emotions. "Collateral damage" for example was used to describe death of civilians, this term is more clinical, and does encourages detachment of emotion. Programmes were broadcast for all ages; for children there were stories broadcast and for adults as well as news there were also broadcasts from famous performers and heroes of the entertainment industry performing over the radio. Information submitted by government for inclusion in bulletins was often extremely biased. ...read more.


This shows how strongly the citizens looked to their neighbours for how to respond. When surrounded by others crying, screaming and trembling all over, they reacted similarly, before then, however, they had coped better. The Government worked hard to ensure the delicate balance between ensuring the truth was not kept from the public, because this would have caused the public to disbelieve what they saw. News is passed in other ways than through the media which can be censored. Word of mouth would have meant people could hear of the atrocities occurring (for example, in Coventry) however, by mentioning it in a positive light (showing people re-building) and not in a negative, destructive way, the people did not realise that the censorship was occurring In conclusion, I think that the quick governmental realisation of the use of media to maintain morale had an essential role in the war effort. Essentially they assessed every avenue of communication with the public and ensured that there were appropriate measures in place to make sure that only the government's message was given to the people. The people of Britian would have been aware of the effects of the Blitz, particularly if they were living in London or another city directly being attacked, but through watching the reactions of other people through the media, they were informed in how to respond. . William Pate CAND No. 5181 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Sourcework - The impression that the British faced the Blitz with courage and unity ...

    government introduced comedy celebrities such as Charlie Chaplin who made films such as "the great dictator" which made fun of Hitler therefore making the British public believe that Hitler was nothing worth considering other than a joke. Because of this, Hitler made a list that included Charlie Chaplin's name of to be killed should they invade and take over Britain.

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45. What can you learn from Source ...

    Both the British and Germans knew that the Royal Air Force could not protect Britain's skies as it was out numbered and outclassed at the time. The damage that Hitler was trying to cause was not just destruction but psychological damage.

  1. Battle Of Britain - The Popular Myth

    a peaceful end to Britain, as his attentions were on the Battle for Russia. Sir Hugh Dowding does not even get a mention for his service to our country, he set up the nerve centre for the whole population, but was highly disliked by his comrades and eventually Winston Churchill, he retired in October 1940.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the response of British people to ...

    I can also tell that it isn't a spontaneous photograph, as you wouldn't get such a large group of people in the same place who all happen to be smiling, unless it was planned. All of this proves it wasn't taken on the off chance it must have been planned


    which shows that people were still eager to defend their country against oppressors, and that they had the courage and unity to stand together and defend it. This shows that the British were undeniably courageous and united because of the level of commitment and patriotism that they displayed to their country.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the response of the British people ...

    It is unclear whether the volunteers are people identifying bodies or helping the wardens. I don't think that this picture is staged because the workers aren't looking at the camera, except for one person who I think has just glanced around and realized some one is taking a picture.

  1. What can you learn from source A about the response of the British people ...

    This being the case we can not learn the true response of the British Public to the Blitz only from this source. Consequently I feel that although there is much that can be learned from this source such as the 'unshakeable determination' that was shown by the British public.

  2. Women & the British Car Industry

    This was taken 9 years before the Equal Pay Act and so the few women that are shown would have been paid less than the men. Source 3 shows a row of women working at Cowley in 1934. They are making upholstery and trim for the interior of the cars being manufactured.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work