• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

7) Study the following interpretations of the Reichstag Fire. i) Van der Lubbe was a madman, and he set fire to the Reichstag all by himself, but the Nazis genuinely believed the fire was the start of a Communist uprising. ii) The Reichstag Fire was started by the Nazis to give them an excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. It's difficult to incline the balance to any of both interpretations because both of them have evidence to backup them. Source A for instance, supports the first interpretation, it suggests that Lubbe acted a lone and Diels to backup his words tells that it would be easily set the fire because the old furniture, dry wood, and heavy curtains would made the fire spread rapidly, while Lubbe could be starting fires elsewhere in the building running through the long corridors. ...read more.

Middle

Anyway, he also could be lying show the reliability here is very questionable, he could be telling that for saving himself, to revenge on him. However, it was at Hitler's birthday, so Goring could been easily drunk and say that in a joke (despite there was the possibility that the alcohol could make say what he shouldn't say). Goring in Source F describes of "ridiculous" the statement before, he could be telling the truth and said that in sense of a joke while he was drunk, which explains why he didn't remember nothing he said, so maybe the two are telling the truth - Halder could take too seriously what for Goring was a joke while he was drunk to make some fun on Hitler's birthday. However it Halder was telling the truth and Goring said that seriously its obvious that Goring would have defend himself as shown in Source F. Most likely Halder could misunderstand Goring's joke so the value of his evidence could hardly support the second statement. ...read more.

Conclusion

The most important thing is the weight and reliability that each source have, and all of them have reasons to not be true. For my interpretation of the sources and my knowledge it would be more likely that the Nazis took part in the fire. The first statement isn't very well supported because despite the evidence in their favour (such the fact that the fire could be spread very rapidly due to the materials inside) Van der Lubbe couldn't make such a high damage and devastation as shown in source J, it's very hard to believe that all that damage could be done a person who hardly had any time (before being caught), who didn't have any knowledge of the place, and who had a severe sight problem and so mentally ones. The curious thing that makes you think is that the fire was made just one week before the elections, very possibly the Nazis could have planned the fire as an excuse to use the emergency powers, by blaming the Communists of an uprising and so crushing the opposition in favour for their elections. Because we got to remember that Hitler's greatest fear at that time was the Communism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source F is a piece of secondary evidence given by Goring at his trial for war crimes. He is replying to Halder's accusations that he started the fire. Source G is a piece of primary evidence, it is a confession saying that Karl Ernst (leader of the S.A)

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Therefore, if van der Lubbe admitted the blame, the Nazis could use that as an excuse to ban the party. Also, Nazis feared the rise of the communist. The USSR was beginning to expand to the west and east to spread their communist ideas during 1930s.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Source E is reliable in some ways. This extract from Rauschning's book states that he 'discovered that the National Socialist leadership was solely responsible and that Hitler knew of the plan and approved it' which shows he is not being biased towards Germany, which you would probably think as he was a German.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    Both sources A and B reflect this anti-Communist approach to circumstances surrounding the fire and the advantage that Hitler took of the event. 4. Study Source D Use the source and your knowledge of the period to explain why the Nazis would want to publish a book like this one.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    helped him start these other fires might have helped him with the Reichstag fire'. Apart from being a direct contradiction between each other, Diels also expresses a great deal of uncertainty in these quotes, mainly by making use of the words 'believe', 'suggested' and 'might'.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    This decree that Hindenburg is handing to Hitler in the cartoon is the 'Decree for the Protection of the People and the State' issued on February 28th that allowed Hitler amongst other things to arrest leading Communists. In that respect, the Reichstag fire was of great advantage to Hitler in his run for power.

  1. Analyse and evaluate the validity of these two interpretations of the opposition to the ...

    Lee; while Source B is from Collier and Pedley's book, "Germany 1919-1945". The research that goes in to the work of academic historians is enough to ensure that to the best of the historian's ability, the source is correct; reading up on the subject in great detail, and reading

  2. The Reichstag Fire

    Between 1919-23 the Nazi party had become very popular. They years 1919-23 were named ''the nightmare years''. The Nazi party became very popular because they promised to try and save Germany, and their appeal to the nation improved with hyperinflation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work