• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

7) Study the following interpretations of the Reichstag Fire. i) Van der Lubbe was a madman, and he set fire to the Reichstag all by himself, but the Nazis genuinely believed the fire was the start of a Communist uprising. ii) The Reichstag Fire was started by the Nazis to give them an excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. It's difficult to incline the balance to any of both interpretations because both of them have evidence to backup them. Source A for instance, supports the first interpretation, it suggests that Lubbe acted a lone and Diels to backup his words tells that it would be easily set the fire because the old furniture, dry wood, and heavy curtains would made the fire spread rapidly, while Lubbe could be starting fires elsewhere in the building running through the long corridors. ...read more.

Middle

Anyway, he also could be lying show the reliability here is very questionable, he could be telling that for saving himself, to revenge on him. However, it was at Hitler's birthday, so Goring could been easily drunk and say that in a joke (despite there was the possibility that the alcohol could make say what he shouldn't say). Goring in Source F describes of "ridiculous" the statement before, he could be telling the truth and said that in sense of a joke while he was drunk, which explains why he didn't remember nothing he said, so maybe the two are telling the truth - Halder could take too seriously what for Goring was a joke while he was drunk to make some fun on Hitler's birthday. However it Halder was telling the truth and Goring said that seriously its obvious that Goring would have defend himself as shown in Source F. Most likely Halder could misunderstand Goring's joke so the value of his evidence could hardly support the second statement. ...read more.

Conclusion

The most important thing is the weight and reliability that each source have, and all of them have reasons to not be true. For my interpretation of the sources and my knowledge it would be more likely that the Nazis took part in the fire. The first statement isn't very well supported because despite the evidence in their favour (such the fact that the fire could be spread very rapidly due to the materials inside) Van der Lubbe couldn't make such a high damage and devastation as shown in source J, it's very hard to believe that all that damage could be done a person who hardly had any time (before being caught), who didn't have any knowledge of the place, and who had a severe sight problem and so mentally ones. The curious thing that makes you think is that the fire was made just one week before the elections, very possibly the Nazis could have planned the fire as an excuse to use the emergency powers, by blaming the Communists of an uprising and so crushing the opposition in favour for their elections. Because we got to remember that Hitler's greatest fear at that time was the Communism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Therefore, he had to get rid of the communists. He did this by blaming van der Lubbe and his communist friends for setting the fire off. Van der Lubbe admitted that he was the only one who set the fire.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    Source D supports source C as it was released shortly after the fire and suggests the control of the Communists for the advantage of the people, this would have gained votes in election as it produced fear and security. Source C suggests that Hitler gain votes using the Reichstag fire to eventually lead to his dictatorship.

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The fire was only a week before the German elections that Hitler had organised, hoping that he could get over 50% of the votes and therefore could rule as a dictator. The fire was very useful to Hitler, because he could blame it on Van der Lubbe, who was a

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    not as useful as it could be, as Goebbels' job was to manipulate the truth in favour of the Nazis. So because this account is reporting what the Nazis did that night, this source cannot be reliable and only slightly useful, when supported by Source A.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Although a large event like the Reichstag fire is not easily forgotten, there is no way that Diels could remember in the amount of detail expressed in the source. Diels gives hugely complicated quotations, such as G�ring shouting; 'There will be no mercy now.

  2. Analyse and evaluate the validity of these two interpretations of the opposition to the ...

    Many resented the fact that in 1939 it was made compulsory to join the Hitler Youth, which allowed the leaders of it to concentrate on indoctrination of the youth. The extract from source A, "the emergence of "alternative and even "oppositional cultures and groups" and lines two to three in source B refers to the "Edelweisspiraten" and the "Swing Jugend".

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Therefore lots could have been made up. However, he might have kept a diary or got information off of police records. He wrote this book in later life to make himself look important and to impress his Nazis bosses. This book came to light at the time of the Nuremberg trials.

  2. Why did the Nazis set fire to the Reichstag

    And over the next eighteen months Hitler eliminated all political oppositions and was on his way to absolute power and Germany soon became a one-party state. The mean of this is to consolidate their power throughout the government since the communist was always their biggest threat.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work