• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Interpretations of the Reichstag Fire.

Extracts from this document...


7) Study the following interpretations of the Reichstag Fire. i) Van der Lubbe was a madman, and he set fire to the Reichstag all by himself, but the Nazis genuinely believed the fire was the start of a Communist uprising. ii) The Reichstag Fire was started by the Nazis to give them an excuse to take emergency powers and lock up or kill the Communists. Van der Lubbe was used by the Nazis. Which interpretation is best supported by the evidence in these sources and your knowledge of the period? Explain your answer. It's difficult to incline the balance to any of both interpretations because both of them have evidence to backup them. Source A for instance, supports the first interpretation, it suggests that Lubbe acted a lone and Diels to backup his words tells that it would be easily set the fire because the old furniture, dry wood, and heavy curtains would made the fire spread rapidly, while Lubbe could be starting fires elsewhere in the building running through the long corridors. ...read more.


Anyway, he also could be lying show the reliability here is very questionable, he could be telling that for saving himself, to revenge on him. However, it was at Hitler's birthday, so Goring could been easily drunk and say that in a joke (despite there was the possibility that the alcohol could make say what he shouldn't say). Goring in Source F describes of "ridiculous" the statement before, he could be telling the truth and said that in sense of a joke while he was drunk, which explains why he didn't remember nothing he said, so maybe the two are telling the truth - Halder could take too seriously what for Goring was a joke while he was drunk to make some fun on Hitler's birthday. However it Halder was telling the truth and Goring said that seriously its obvious that Goring would have defend himself as shown in Source F. Most likely Halder could misunderstand Goring's joke so the value of his evidence could hardly support the second statement. ...read more.


The most important thing is the weight and reliability that each source have, and all of them have reasons to not be true. For my interpretation of the sources and my knowledge it would be more likely that the Nazis took part in the fire. The first statement isn't very well supported because despite the evidence in their favour (such the fact that the fire could be spread very rapidly due to the materials inside) Van der Lubbe couldn't make such a high damage and devastation as shown in source J, it's very hard to believe that all that damage could be done a person who hardly had any time (before being caught), who didn't have any knowledge of the place, and who had a severe sight problem and so mentally ones. The curious thing that makes you think is that the fire was made just one week before the elections, very possibly the Nazis could have planned the fire as an excuse to use the emergency powers, by blaming the Communists of an uprising and so crushing the opposition in favour for their elections. Because we got to remember that Hitler's greatest fear at that time was the Communism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The title of the cartoon, I think, is also important. 'The Red Peril' could be taken to mean different things: 'Red' means Communist, and 'Peril' obviously means danger. But is this title saying 'Danger of the Communists', which would mean the artist was either for the Nazis or neutral, but

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    Source E is reliable in some ways. This extract from Rauschning's book states that he 'discovered that the National Socialist leadership was solely responsible and that Hitler knew of the plan and approved it' which shows he is not being biased towards Germany, which you would probably think as he was a German.

  1. Study the following interpretations of the Reichstag Fire.

    You would except that the author writing this history book would have researched the topic thoroughly but this may not be the case, we do not know this for sure. At the time of the Reichstag Fire many people believed that Van de Lubbe was working as art of a Communist lot, especially the Nazi leaders.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Therefore, he had to get rid of the communists. He did this by blaming van der Lubbe and his communist friends for setting the fire off. Van der Lubbe admitted that he was the only one who set the fire.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    busy he had started several dozen fires in different places in the Reichstag'. There were no eyewitnesses, forensic evidence or any other confirmation of this occurring. Diels has based his opinion on his own, unsubstantiated views and ignored any proof that existed at the time.

  2. Why did the Nazis set fire to the Reichstag

    It has acted as part of the Nazis terror tactics, and somehow used Van der Lubbe in order to blame the communist. By doing so, the Nazis had created sense of crisis by arresting and imprisoning 4000 communist leaders in the night of 27th February.

  1. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    Hitler is holding a paper with 'Emergency powers' wrote on it. This means that with this he could put in trial and kill the Communists, his political rivals. Source D shows something very similar: that the Nazis took the opportunity to increase their power in Germany.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    For example, the fact Goering and Hitler arrived so quickly on the scene may have aroused suspicion. Also, Rudolf Diels says that after he had collected his thoughts, he declared, "This is a mad house". It may have been unwise to release this particular statement at the time especially as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work