• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Irish Coursework

Extracts from this document...


Between 100 BC and 1500 AD, Ireland was invaded three times. The first attack was by the Celts, then the Vikings and the the third by the Normans. Every time Ireland was invaded the settlers merged together and inter-married. This made Ireland become "One country, One Culture and One religion (Roman Catholic) all apart from one small part of Ireland that was called The Pale, this was controlled by England After 1500 AD there was an important change in the relationship between the English and Irish. This happened because English rulers became more interested in Ireland as England had become a protestant country after the Reformation. However Ireland stayed a country that was ruled by Roman Catholics. King Henry decided to call himself the "king of Ireland" because he wanted more power and then he told his chieftains that they had to obey him. This was when the Tudors started to change. When King Henry passed away his daughter, Elizabeth, became Queen. Elizabeth decide to change all the prayer books and the Bible to reinforce a protestant view, this is when the trouble started as the Catholics in Ireland could not accept this. The Catholics in Ireland hated the Tudors and the Protestants; they were fed up of all being controlled and being told what to do. Hugh O'Neil, a Catholic, formed an army and tried to make himself King Of Ireland but as England was better in many ways and had a stronger and more powerful Army and Navy, O'Neil was defeated. As a result of this he took his Catholics and moved to the south, but strangely the Tudors let this happen. After this, English rulers decided that military force and war was not enough to control Ireland, Ireland had the land that England wanted as the land was the resource they needed to secure power, so a different approach was needed. ...read more.


This shows us that the English attitude still holds us a lot of hatred and distrust and that the English government are prepared to lie. This cartoon was made about 100 years before The Troubles broke out and it may have been along time before it all started, but it maybe more accurate than information for 400 years before. It isn't accurate because things have most probably changed between one hundred years, although, there could have been things that happened in the nineteenth century that have lead to reasons for why the troubles broke out. The cartoon is suggesting that in the nineteenth century, the Catholic Church held all the power and they are enslaving the normal Catholic people. From my knowledge of Irish history, this was not true. Really, it was the Protestants in England that held the power as they made the penal laws. The third Source I am going to examine is Source D. Source D is written autobiography written by Bernadette Devlin, although she was an Irish catholic explaining her school days her opinion on the troubles between the Catholics and the Protestants is very balanced but it is still only one persons point of view. I believe that Bernadette Devlin made this because people did want to know about the happenings in Ireland, they wanted the truth. We can use this source because it was written by someone who was involved in the Troubles and understood why the Catholics were angry. Although there was this it also showed that Irish school children were brought up to be patriotic and nationalists she still strongly believes that Protestants cannot be classed as Irish. This source helps us try and solve out the troubles because it shows us why young catholic people got involved in the civil rights March's etc however it does not explain the final answer. The fourth source I am going to examine is source F. ...read more.


Since 'Bloody Sunday' there has been two Enquiries about what happened on the 30th January 1972 .The first one was written by Lord Chief Justice: Lord Widgery. Lord Widgery was demanded to write a report about what happened on 'Bloody Sunday' by the Prime Minister Edward Heith. Lord Widgery was part of the Establishment and the government, his Enquiry started on the 31st January 1972 and finished on 17th April 1972. What he put in his report after the Enquiry was that that the army were just doing there job although he did put that some of the soldiers were being wreck less and some were being respectful soldiers but there was on big flaw with this Report and that was how did he collect all his evidence and interviewed people in just 11 weeks? ON the other hand before Lord Widgery was Lord Chief Justice ha was in the British army, This does not look good when writing a report about the army because it could show that the Lord Widgery' report was biased , And infact this is what most Irish people and witnesses said and even said it was just a 'whitewash'. On the other hand this is good for the British soldiers as it was making them look good. After Tony Blair was voted Prime Minister after being Prime Minister he had demanded a new Enquiry written about what happened on 'Bloody Sunday' The Enquiry was held out by Lord Saville. His Enquiry started January 1998 and is due to finish in 2009; this second Enquiry was needed because Tony Blair thought that Lord Widgery had missed out lots and lots of witnesses also Lord Widgery did not interview any of the injured people involved and thirdly there were three more types of new evidence 1. New eye witnesses 2. New Forensic Evidence and 3. New Medical Evidence. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sam Curtin-Sewell History Coursework Mr.Brockhurst Northern Ireland Q.1 Page 1 of 7 05/05/2009 21:14:42 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Saltaire Coursework.

    workers in and out of the village and the canal could also have been used to bring in coal and other raw materials. Another key decision to build Saltaire was that a Welshman called Robert Owen had built a similar model village near Glasgow and that was a successful development producing a 46% profit capital.

  2. Was Cromwell a Hero or a Villain?

    Samuel Peeps (Charles 2nd employee) said: "Everyone misses Cromwell." 1667 The comment seems genuine and authentic because Samuel works for a Royalist, yet he is saying a nice thing about Cromwell. Definitely seems like a good piece of evidence. Edmund Hudlow furthermore added to the good points of Cromwell by saying: "Brilliant military leader but bad leader for the country."

  1. Why Do The Irish Hate The English... Notes!

    * No catholic can give his land to one son. He must divide it up between them but if one son became protestant then he shall give all his land to one son this means that there are no equal rights for Catholics and protestant.

  2. vietnam coursework

    battles with open warfare they were unable to combat the Vietcong's Guerrilla tactics which lead to their defeat. Also source C tells that the VC hardly ever fought set piece battles. " the rare occasion when the VC chose to fight a set-piece battle provided the only indictment" this also

  1. Fountains Abbey Coursework

    As the abbey was originally formed in 1132 as an attempt by a small band of Monks to escape from greed and corruption, we can gather that by this time, they had lost many of there core values. However, we can see another angle.

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    Peel was in favour of free trade, and freedom of religion and freedom of people. His policies consisted of these principles. The Corn Laws conflicted with Peels ideals of the time, and also conflicted with the Laissez-faire attitude of the period, clearly visible in attitudes surrounding issues such as public health.

  1. Effect of Civilians in WW2

    However, it's propaganda and it's one-sided. The second newsreel is a British newsreel. It was done in April, 1941. It makes sure the viewer can see the heroicness going on. The background noise is happy. It focuses on the British giving aid.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    The main reason why they disliked him so much was that people blamed Cromwell for all the bad things that happened as historians made up stories that could never of happened; a story tells of four-year Cromwell punching two-year Prince Charles in the face but these two people never met when they were young.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work