• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15

Irish History

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History GCSE Coursework 1. Explain why there was a rising in Dublin in 1916. The Easter Rising was a militarily unsuccessful rebellion staged in Ireland against British rule, which started on Easter Monday in April 1916. When World War 1 began, Irish nationalists decided to put their demands on hold until the war was over. However, by 1916, a small group of Fenians decided that they had waited long enough. They organised an armed rebellion in Dublin on Easter Monday 1916. They took over the Post Office and declared Ireland a republic. After a week, the uprising collapsed and the rebels surrendered. It was a surprise to most people, as they were not expecting it. The Rising was inspired by a rise in Irish nationalism. The Gaelic Revival of the Irish language was one of the indirect causes it was mainly promoted by the Gaelic League and Douglas Hyde. Another was the popularity of the Gaelic League. This was founded by Douglas Hyde, Eoin Mac Neill, Father Eugene O' Growney, and four others. And the Anglo Irish Literary Society was also an indirect cause. There were also some long term reasons for the Easter Rising. The Irish Nationalists aim to set up an independent Ireland. This would mean that they would loose ties with England and the rest of Great Britian. Irish Nationalism was also a key factor in long term causes of the Rising. Irish nationalism refers to political movements that desire greater autonomy or the independence of Ireland from Great Britain. The nationalist position is often contrasted with that of Unionists. Irish nationalism is particularly associated with the Roman Catholic community, especially in Northern Ireland. There was usually a history of violence within Ireland. Some examples are Wolfe Tonne and the United Irishmen. Another key factor was Irelands dissatisfation with the Act of Union, 1800. During the Irish Famine between 1846 and 1849 the British government at Westminster did very little to help the people suffering. ...read more.

Middle

But it does have some flaws as these cultural differences were apparent from the 1920s, and so the question is asked, why didn't the troubles start then? In addition to this, education should be teaching values to children, not to be provoking violence and separation. In the next source, source E, it was a pictorial source from a Protestant viewpoint. Source E is a nineteenth century showing Erin (Ireland) bound in rope by a Catholic priest. This shows us that Protestants thought that it was the Catholic Church controlled the Irish people and Ireland. I feel that this source is more useful than the previous source (source D) as it shows us that Protestants felt fear towards Catholics. Protestants felt that if Ireland became an all Ireland that the Protestants would be ruled by the Catholics. Although source E is not immediate enough to be related to the troubles, it defines deeper cultural opinions and fears between these two separate communities. Source F, the next source, is, in my opinion, a very useful source. It is a pictorial source, showing a map of Derry, and the Gerrymandering going on in Derry in 1966. "Gerry Mander" was the name of an American councillor who fixed the electoral boundaries to win the election, since then, this type of rigging of elections are known as the "Gerrymandering." Source F shows the political differences in the 1960's as although there were 2:1 Catholics to Protestants living in Derry at that time, there were only 8 nationalist councillors, and 12 unionist councillors in the Derry council in 1966. I believe that source F is one of the more useful sources that I have studied because it is more of an immediate cause of the troubles, unlike the previous two sources. Due to this Gerrymandering, Catholics felt that Protestants were given the most powerful jobs within the government, this is proved in source J as it told us that only 36 out of 500 jobs were held by Catholics at Stormont in 1932, and all of the top positions were all held by Protestants. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another source which I studied is from a Catholic priest, Father Bradley, he describes Bloody Sunday as a "massacre." He suggested that the British army should "hang its head in shame" after the "disgusting violence" which he witnessed. Father Bradley possibly had this view because he is a Catholic, and this is a nationalist viewpoint, and a majority of Catholics believed that the army were mainly at fault for the troubles. On the other hand, in a different source in which Nigel Wade writing about Bloody Sunday for the Daily Telegraph. It is very conservative. He holds a more neutral viewpoint, and states that it was "impossible to tell who fired the first shots". This is a more diplomatic view, as he is writing for what is possibly a more diplomatic paper, which is refusing to take sides with either the nationalists or the unionists. Similarly, a report from Lord Widgery, a British judge who investigated Bloody Sunday for the British government said, "some soldiers showed a high degree of responsibility ...(others) firing bordered on the reckless." This shows a neutral understanding of both sides and is again very sensitive to both arguments. This is possibly because Lord Widgery maybe felt obliged to agree with the British government, rather than possibly starting a controversy by blaming the army for the 14 civilians killed. To conclude, there are many reasons for all of the different historical interpretations of Bloody Sunday; different people simply believe in different things, the nationalists believe the army was completely at fault, the unionists believe the civil rights marchers should not have been marching where they were, and then those who think Bloody Sunday was a tragedy waiting to happen. The interpretations that I have mentioned above are reliable to a certain extent. Even though this inquiry can't bring back the 14 victims it can bring an end to the Troubles in Northern Ireland. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    Sinn Fein would soak up disillusioned home rulers, and change the Irish question from one of Home Rule to one of Independence.

  2. What were the causes of the Easter Rising?

    As source A and B tells us. He was called a " Notorious Traitor " by a British newspaper in source d. this is biased though but in reality this seems right for what he did. In source e there is some factual information but the day of capture is

  1. The Easter Rising.

    During the Second World War 1939-45 Eire refused to contribute and declared itself a neutral country but Eire helped Northern Ireland with the worst effects of the bombing raids. Another change which occurred was in 1949, Prime Minister John Costello took Eire out of the British Commonwealth and the country

  2. Ireland - What are the main differences between the beliefs of the Republicans/Nationalists and ...

    It would help the process of peace because it was supposed to make both Irish and British governments 'recognise and respect the identities of the two communities in Northern Ireland.' (Source 6). This means that both Nationalists and Unionists would have to acknowledge that they were different, and respect each other.

  1. The 1913 lockout, 1916 rising, the treaty of 1921 and the causes of the ...

    They decided on a 9 man anti-conscription committee; Griffith, De Valera, Devlin, W. O'Brien, Egan, Healy, Johnson, WX O'Brien and Dillon. On the same day the catholic bishops were holding their annual meeting at Maynooth. They met the anti-conscription committee and both decided on a pledge that was to be

  2. How far do the sources support the view that Irish Nationalism was an 'increasingly ...

    Source four was written in 1880 with an economic crisis on the horizon. This saw the formation of the Irish National Land League by Michael Davitt to protect the rural population. Parnell was its president but the speech depicts Parnell's stance in an unclear light.

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    It meant that the most strident voices and those who could command weaponry were the people who set the agenda. The Battle of the Bogside ( August 12, 1969) - A Turning Point It's difficult to underestimate the symbolic importance of the Battle of the Bogside.

  2. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    In the 1983 Westminster election the party refused to enter an electoral pact with Sinn Fein and fought all 17 seats. However the party won only one seat when John Hume took the Foyle constituency. The party took part in the New Ireland Forum and many of its ideas were incorporated in the report of the forum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work