• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is source F more reliable than source E as evidence about the lives of women in China after the first revolution?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is source F more reliable than source E as evidence about the lives of women in China after the first revolution? Life was hard for most women in China before the first revolution. In this essay I will be observing both sources; E and F, stating which I think was more reliable after having compared them. Source E was written by Jonathon Spence, a British author, in 1981. It is based on 'The Gate of Heavenly Peace.' The purpose of this source was to educate people as it was taken from a textbook. The fact that the source was taken from a textbook meant that the author would have to be neutral in his interpretations; giving a fair account for both sides. Therefore, this would mean that the source is reliable, in one aspect, as it has a balanced story line. In addition, taking into consideration that source E was in fact written by a British author, who uses the word 'abuse' for the events of the Chinese culture, shows that source E has a one sided, western, perspective. ...read more.

Middle

80% of women were poor peasants and the lifestyle still remained extremely hard, even after the revolution in 1911, which is another aspect of unreliability. The author also says that most people were ending the practices of foot binding and infanticide, which I know is true because these two things were outlawed in 1912. Therefore this implies that the source is reliable. Source F was unreliable in the way that it was highlighting the positive aspects of communism; to persuade people to join their party. This is merely because it was written by a communist, Hu Yepin. Source F was written in 1930 about life in the communist province of Jiangxi. Hu Yepin only talks about one area of China, therefore, it is not particularly reliable as it does not show and explain the overall lives of women. The fact that source F was written for a story is also another aspect in which we can question its reliability. ...read more.

Conclusion

I would say that I disagree with it. Source E and F are both unreliable in the sense that source F is written too close to the event and source E is written far away from the event. This is both a good and bad thing as source E has the benefit of hindsight, but at the same time information could have been lost and altered. In addition, source F is unreliable as it is written too close to the event so enough information could have not been collected; however, it would also be coming from a person who experienced the revolution. I say that I think source E is more reliable as there is more evidence and facts, whilst source F is vague. Source F is also polemically written and manipulates the women. I think that source E was also more reliable as the author, Jonathon Spence, was neutral in his interpretations and was writing for the purpose of education. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why was there a German revolution in 1918 and how far had it gone ...

    This would help to prevent a more radical revolution. They still had great power in the new republic but were not committed to its success or survival in the longer term and in some respects the democracy still relied upon them. The communists however must take some blame for the failure/limitations of the German revolution.

  2. Romanov Family Question F

    image of the Basement room in the Impatiev house where supposed shooting or the Tsar and his family took place. There is also little that can be compared from this source to source J Source G is an artist interpretation of the death of the Tsar, based on the whites investigation.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    than the other" In the end, source G seems to condemn the way the Cultural Revolution developed, rather than the original idea of carking down on those who where against Communism 6. Study source H and I Which of these two sources is the more useful as evidence about the Cultural Revolution?

  2. Stalin - Source based work

    his people, who had become more aware of the rest of Europe through the country's involvement in the Second World War. All the evidence in this source comes from Stalin himself and is just a story that cannot be checked to see if it is true.

  1. Bay of Pigs

    A small group of men were then to be sent north to the town of Jaguey Grande to secure it as well. (See figure 1). When looking at a modern map of Cuba it is obvious that the troops would have problems in the area that was chosen for them to land at.

  2. What Happened to the Romanov Family? - source related study

    Source A is an extract from an American newspaper report, published in December 1918, so about five months after the disappearance of the Romanov family. It was written to inform the American public of what was happening in Russia at the time, maybe explaining one of the factors of the Russian civil war, which was raging at the time.

  1. China: Great Leap Forward, source based work.

    The author says that they have 'no full picture' and that 'people only have stories to tell about starvation'. The source is very negative and seems to make all attempts not show figures of grain production and death. In source D it says that Khrushchev (The leader of the USSR)

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsars' murder - Judge Sokolov, claims, "the entire Romanov family had been massacred" which is backed up by Sources D which describes, "all the members of the Tsar's family lying on the floor. The corpses were taken out to the lorry."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work