• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Stalin a Man or a Monster?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework; Is Stalin a Man or a Monster? Study Sources G and H; �Do you trust Khrushchev's assessments of Stalin? Use your knowledge of Stalin to explain your answer. Source's G and H are both sections taken out of one of Khrushchev's speeches in 1956. The two sources, however, portray two different impressions of Stalin. For this question I am going to combine my own knowledge with background sources/ other sources to conclude if I trust Khrushchev's assessment of Stalin. Khrushchev: After the Russian Revolution had ousted the Czar, Khrushchev joined the Bolshevik forces of the Red Army in the Russian civil war, serving as a political commissar. He was a dedicated communist. Khrushchev's rise to power coincided with one of the darkest periods in Soviet history: the Great Terror. During the 1930s, Stalin began a series of bloody purges to consolidate his power. The terror spread throughout the Soviet Union, and Khrushchev was part of it. ...read more.


This was all going to take place through a series of 5 year plans. Russia was going to be pulled out from the stone ages and thrown into the modern world head first to take the stand as a dominant industrialised country. Not any easy task and harsh sacrifices were going to be made in order to accomplish this. Sources G and H carry no bias opinions at all, unlike previous sources I have studied. Source G especially applies to this as Stalin and Khrushchev were both close and therefore Khrushchev would have no need to exaggerate Stalin's murderous personal. There would be no need to lie to benefit Stalin neither is there any need to portray Stalin badly. Stalin and Khrushchev were never enemies. Source G is a plot by Khrushchev to obtain popularity from the Russian people. This source tells us a lot about what Stalin was like and what people thought of him. ...read more.


It is hard to say why Khrushchev would say this as he so widely praised and glorified Stalin in previous speeches. The statements that Khrushchev makes in Source H are somewhat political. Khrushchev was a liberal leader and he wanted to develop new relationships with Europe. His liberal attitude gave Russian people the feeling of more freedom. Although Khrushchev did not particularly need Russian approval as he was already an absolute dictator; by seeming liberal the capitalists west may begin to trade with him. This source had to ensure capitalists that Stalin was an anomie; he had to enforce the impression that the new leaders were different. This would inevitably abolish any fear of communism. It is extremely hard to believe that these two sources are extracted from the same speech. As they completely contradict themselves it is hard to know whether they are trustworthy assessments. I would conclude after closely examining both sources, that source G is more reliable. I believe this source more as it coincides with my own knowledge of the type of man Stalin was. I take source G to be more reliable, balanced and unbiased. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    High discipline meant that if you were just twenty minutes late for work, you could be fined, lose your ration card or be sacked. Food was rationed to the workers and everyone got an equal share however some did suffer from malnutrition.

  2. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    Bukharin, a former supporter of Stalin, wrote source F. However Stalin betrayed him and this probably affected his view of him. This was from a speech he made about Stalin while in Paris in 1936. It gives a completely different impression of Stalin to source E.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Others show Stalin to be an evil, killing dictator. The first source that agrees Stalin was a good man is source B. it is a piece of propaganda for Stalin. He's wearing white, smoking a pipe, smiling with the workers, which suggests he's relaxed, has things under control and has a good relationship with the workers he cares about.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source A suggests that Stalin is a spiteful and cruel dictator that is responsible for the death of millions of Russians. However, they are also similar in many ways; both sources show Stalin as an individual. In source A Stalin is the only person shown next to the pyramids of

  1. Stalin man or monster

    where the end of their lives was met. Nearly every family in the Soviet Union had lost someone to the purges, where raids in the middle of the nights took place and some people "simply disappeared." Source A thus gives an impression of an evil Stalin, portraying him as an

  2. Stalin: Man or monster?

    It could also prove useful to people studying popular opinions of Stalin in the western world at that time. However, it can be classed as unreliable when searching for factual information about Stalin. 3) Neither of these sources is completely reliable.

  1. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    People would have been sent into these camps were an intoxicating gas was released, killing anyone inside the camp. Life was also hard, as Stalin had the KNVD (secret police), who would arrest people for the pettiest crimes. To add to that there was indoctrination, in which the only thing

  2. Stalin, Man or Monster? Source based questions.

    people he put to death, and he became detached from the real world until people were just objects to him. I don't believe that Stalin would have killed so many people if he had realised how bad it was and how much suffering they went through.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work