• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Stalin a Man or a Monster?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework; Is Stalin a Man or a Monster? Study Sources G and H; �Do you trust Khrushchev's assessments of Stalin? Use your knowledge of Stalin to explain your answer. Source's G and H are both sections taken out of one of Khrushchev's speeches in 1956. The two sources, however, portray two different impressions of Stalin. For this question I am going to combine my own knowledge with background sources/ other sources to conclude if I trust Khrushchev's assessment of Stalin. Khrushchev: After the Russian Revolution had ousted the Czar, Khrushchev joined the Bolshevik forces of the Red Army in the Russian civil war, serving as a political commissar. He was a dedicated communist. Khrushchev's rise to power coincided with one of the darkest periods in Soviet history: the Great Terror. During the 1930s, Stalin began a series of bloody purges to consolidate his power. The terror spread throughout the Soviet Union, and Khrushchev was part of it. ...read more.


This was all going to take place through a series of 5 year plans. Russia was going to be pulled out from the stone ages and thrown into the modern world head first to take the stand as a dominant industrialised country. Not any easy task and harsh sacrifices were going to be made in order to accomplish this. Sources G and H carry no bias opinions at all, unlike previous sources I have studied. Source G especially applies to this as Stalin and Khrushchev were both close and therefore Khrushchev would have no need to exaggerate Stalin's murderous personal. There would be no need to lie to benefit Stalin neither is there any need to portray Stalin badly. Stalin and Khrushchev were never enemies. Source G is a plot by Khrushchev to obtain popularity from the Russian people. This source tells us a lot about what Stalin was like and what people thought of him. ...read more.


It is hard to say why Khrushchev would say this as he so widely praised and glorified Stalin in previous speeches. The statements that Khrushchev makes in Source H are somewhat political. Khrushchev was a liberal leader and he wanted to develop new relationships with Europe. His liberal attitude gave Russian people the feeling of more freedom. Although Khrushchev did not particularly need Russian approval as he was already an absolute dictator; by seeming liberal the capitalists west may begin to trade with him. This source had to ensure capitalists that Stalin was an anomie; he had to enforce the impression that the new leaders were different. This would inevitably abolish any fear of communism. It is extremely hard to believe that these two sources are extracted from the same speech. As they completely contradict themselves it is hard to know whether they are trustworthy assessments. I would conclude after closely examining both sources, that source G is more reliable. I believe this source more as it coincides with my own knowledge of the type of man Stalin was. I take source G to be more reliable, balanced and unbiased. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    This could be shown from World War Two. As Hitler and his Nazi party hated the idea of communism, it was one of his plans to invade Russia. When they did attempt this, the Russian army, quite successfully, fought them off.

  2. Purges and Hysteria in the Soviet Union

    In 1937, it is estimated, around 3000 of them were shot. In January 1937, more Bolsheviks stood trial. They confessed and were executed for participating with anti-Soviet "Trotskyites" and for having spied for Germany and Japan. Trotsky, it was said, had met Rudolf Hess and had agreed to plans for

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This could be interpreted as someone who was obsessed with Stalin, a complete exaggeration to an extent where it's a joke or a way of saving someone's life. It is not clear if this source is spoken truthfully or not.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source A suggests that Stalin is a spiteful and cruel dictator that is responsible for the death of millions of Russians. However, they are also similar in many ways; both sources show Stalin as an individual. In source A Stalin is the only person shown next to the pyramids of

  1. Stalin man or monster

    The five year plan is one that industrialised the Soviet unions industries and raw materials, where produce was boasted with unemployment falling. The five year plans were used effectively for propaganda purposes. Stalin had wanted the Soviet Union to a beacon of socialism and his publicity machine used successes of industrialisation to further that objective.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Also, there was a steady built up of hospitals and nursing rooms were built in each region in Russia to take care of her rising population with so many hard working workers. All factors considered, I have come to a conclusion that I disagree with the idea of Stalin's glorification

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Anti-Stalin themes are clearly prevalent in Source M. The two phrases that attack Stalin are, "monstrous tyrant" and "corrupted by absolute power." It is very obvious from the source that the British historian is saying that Stalin was a very harsh and callous man.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Although in hiding, Deng was a serious contender to the leadership. He had widespread support throughout the bureaucratic and administrative agencies, as well as among the military. Jiang Qing recognised her weakness, only having support among radical students and the extreme left-wing of the party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work