• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the phase “lions led by donkeys” a fair one?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

!!!General Haig Essay!!! Is the phase "lions led by donkeys" a fair one? General Haig was called a donkey. Slow and stubborn. The phase "lions lead by donkeys" is based on him from his tactics during the war. Another name he accumulated was "a butcher" he was described as this also because of his same tactics. The tactic itself was to send men over and over the top to wear down the enemy, this was called triton. This caused many men (lions) to lose their lives. I think this is a fair comment, as Haig knew this would mean the slaughter of thousands of brave soldiers, but not the death of himself. On the other hand though you could say this is an unfair statement as he is the one who led us to win the best military victory recorded. Haig also lost so many lives as he didn't know what was going on and relied in God to guide him. He wasn't very good at oral communication either and so didn't manage to listen or put forward his ideas. ...read more.

Middle

so the men could have just well shot themselves as when they went out there any range of things could have happened, they could have drowned in a puddle or impaled themselves upon the barbed wire or even just have been shot clear dead. I think Haig was so determined to win that he didn't consider the amount of men he was losing to the Germans. Laffin said, "he didn't understand technology." So this implies he never used it to his advantage whereas Wilson said, "he liked technology." But Haig must have liked technology despite what Laffin said as on the first day the tank was on order Haig order 1100 tanks. Haig also was a good commander after making his mistakes as he started to realise you should think small. So instead Haig made his targets from big to small attacks. This made the war easier to win. As they could take the Germans section by section. Also after many lessons Haig got many artillery supplies when it was at its best which was 1918. ...read more.

Conclusion

So luckily he managed to keep his job and eventually made us win the war. I think the most important point overall for the comment to be unfair would be my first one, despite the fact that Haig's tactics cost many lives he was the one who lead us to win the greatest military victory recorded. I think this as otherwise if he hadn't we wouldn't be speaking English or may not even exist and live in the free world we do today. But my most important overall reason for the statement to be fair would be that he knew that his plan day after day would make many men injured or killed. I think this, as he never changed his plan for the first 140-145 days within which 66,000 men were injured 20,000 of which were killed. My answer to the question I can not decide as it could be fair and unfair. It depends on the way you look at it. So I looked at both sides as I could not chose between the two. So YES and NO. (Both) By Daniel Shand, 9w2 9PF (930 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    In March 1917, revolution broke out in St Petersburg. Shortages of supplies led to strikes & riots in the city, and law & order broke down. The Russian army mutinied and refused to help. Tsar Nicholas II admitted defeat & abdicated.

  2. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    (George Coppard), and make people dislike General Haig because his friends were killed. But although this may be biased, it is backed up by sources written by Gerard de Groot, Bill Brooks, Bernard Montgomery, etc. It is also backed up by historical evidence, which says that almost twenty thousand men were dead in the first day.

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    Another thing that challenged the Generals, was the type of warfare meant that they had no choice but to expect heavy casualties. They could not prevent this because they had never fought in trench battles. The Generals did not know what to expect or how to prepare.

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    They say that he never intended his cavalry to 'charge' into battle. They were trained to fight mounted and dismounted and Haig made many experiments in co-operation between forces, such as infantry, aircraft and tanks. They say that his initiative in the concept of an "all arms strike force" which

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    Machine guns had been introduced. These guns were capable of causing mutilating injuries. The soldiers had to deal with this night and day with very little in the way of protection such as body armour which would have been capable of stopping a bullet.

  2. "The British Army were Lions led by Donkeys." Discuss.

    Some people may think that the ones that the people died in the war were not lions because some of them may get a trench foot infection intentionally and get sent back home, which is a cowardly act. However, not all of them did it that way and a lot

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work