• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is their sufficient evidence in sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is their sufficient evidence in sources A-F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and early 1970's? Sources A to F do offer multiple reasons why there was an anti-war movement in the USA about Vietnam. In this coursework I am going to explore the sources to pin down the main reasons behind the protests using sources A to F, ("The People's Century - Source F). . Source A, written by Michael Bilton and taken from the book 'Four hours in Mat Lai' describes America's mistakes and the reasons why they failed to win the war. This source doesn't offer reasons which at the time in America would have sparked anti-war movements as the main points touched are the 'tour of duty' and America's 'rookie army'. This source explains why Vietnam won the war but not why there were anti-war protests in the USA. Source B is a photograph of the effects of Napalm on Vietnamese citizens taken and published during the Vietnam War. ...read more.

Middle

Hamer also shows the other side of the story, explaining the difficulties of fighting a guerrilla army by offering a common scenario which American soldiers have to deal with on a regular basis. The source is balanced and offers the arguments used by anti-war protesters therefore going some way to explaining why their was an anti-war movement. Source D is a cartoon published in the British magazine Punch in 1967. It depicts a train which signifies the US economy which is fuelled by the funding for Johnson's 'Great Society' scheme .This included feeding the homeless and providing more medical care. The steam emitted from the train has 'Vietnam' written through it showing that the product of the US economy is the war in Vietnam rather than the continued well being of the American public. This explains the motives of some protesters who believed that government money was going towards the Vietnam War rather than back into America through schemes like the Great society. ...read more.

Conclusion

The lines "We came in spastic/Like tameless horses/We left in plastic/As numbered corpses," shows Joels view on how unexpierenced 'tamelass' young americans were being sent to their deaths.This source shows the war from the perspective of a soldier and the song is more of a protest song for Vietnam veterans rather than the American public. The source is helpful in discovering why there were anti-war protests in the 1960s and 1970's. In my opinion the strongest sources are sources B and E, as these two sources show how the American public were exposed to the horrors of war, and therefore they are the most likely reason for mass protest .The weakest source, in my opinion, is Source A because, although it tells us of a Low IQ and inexperience among soldiers it does not give reason for an anti-war movement in America. In conclusion, I believe that, throughout the sources, there is more than enough information for us to understand why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 60s and early 70s. . Michael Blunsum ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    All though the attack was conducted by the South Vietnamese armed forces, I know from my own knowledge that the American army in Vietnam help to coordinate the attack and cooperate with the South's operation. For many, the picture was the first to truly bring to life the horror of

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    President Johnson does go right into the reasons for America's involvement in Vietnam, in this speech. If we examine the speech closely we can see that Johnson puts across ten clear reasons to Americas actions. In my opinion this speech is effective in persuading the audience that America went into Vietnam for the right reasons.

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The result of this is the damage and destruction in Vietnam. The smoke symbolises this. If you look at the smoke coming out of the train you will see that it says Vietnam. The smoke is caused by the burning of the wood so basically the damage in Vietnam is

  2. Free essay

    Did The United States Lose On The Vietnam War Home front Or Battlefield?

    The soldier's welfare while they were away in the army could have easily helped contribute to their withdrawal and loss of the war. They had extremely long active hours running on little food and sleep. Obviously they wouldn't be fighting to the best of their abilities.

  1. using the sources available, why did America loose to Vietnam?

    After analysing this source it has become clear to me that this interview that was broadcasted on televisions all across America would have created a massive uproar in anti-war movements and this evidence helps greatly to prove the question I am answering.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    It shows Haig is to blame for all the British casualties which most facts and various historians agree with this because Haig's tactic attrition which on a number of times failed. Haig's biggest failure was his incapability to change his orders.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    The source is only presenting one side of the argument as he doesn't mention anything about America having almost limit less money, heavier firepower and the ability to use airstrikes. In the extract it says "The large majority of deaths took place in the first six months".

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    Army during a peace-time period. It then goes on to mention how the tours of duty affected each soldier, with some dying in the first month of duty as this was "highly likely". Due to the soldier rotation and their differing lengths of duty (some of the soldiers were wounded,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work