• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to E to explain there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to E to explain there was an anti war movement in the United States during the late 1960's and 1970's? The Vietnam War had started in 1965 and it lasted till 1973. In the late 1960's and the early 1970's a very strong anti-war movement emerged in the USA, for example there were protest songs and students also protested, I will be combining the sources and my own knowledge to say why there was an anti-war movement. Source A is an extract from a book 'Four Hours in Mai Lai' it is published by Michael Bilton in 1992. This source explains some of the problems faced by the US Soldiers in Vietnam, this for example includes that some workers were most likely to die in the first month of tour of duty in Vietnam, furthermore many workers scored extremely low on their intelligence test. ...read more.

Middle

This source is important because soldiers in Vietnam were fighting an ideological war, and many US civilians did not identify what they were fighting for. Another very powerful reason for the peace movement was the effect that military spending was having on American domestic spending. Fighting the Vietnam War was costing the government approximately $20 billion per year. President Johnson had been elected on a promise to create a "Great Society" but however this was demolished. Johnson promised a Great Society which meant feeding and finding shelter for the homeless, and also to provide more education and medical care, nevertheless the American people realized that Johnson was wasting all the money on fighting the war and not helping the American people. Source D illustrates this as there is a cartoon image which shows the "Great Society" being burnt to pay for the Vietnam War. But however Source D has its limitations because it was mainly the poorest parts of the American society and often Black Americans who suffered the most. ...read more.

Conclusion

victims due to this the American people did not sustain the war as they assumed that they would not win; Vietnam War was the first media war, meaning the American people were watching this on T.V; making them feel as though they didn't support the war. Fighting for the Vietnam War meant that it was costing the government approximately $20 billion per year; all these reasons can be found in the sources. I feel that the most important reason was that the war was publicized on T.V, the reason why I think this is due to the fact that the people who had seen the war on T.V must have seen some unpleasant sights of people dying in pain, furthermore people usually dislike watching an innocent person getting hurt for no particular reason. I feel that this must have had a major effect on the American people as no one would want to suffer from the harsh conditions some of the innocent people suffered from. Mohima Akther History -Page 1- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Questions on World War One.

    When Grey proposed a peace conference, Germany advised Austria to "halt at Belgrade". - France did not declare neutrality for believing a diplomatic victory with Britain on their side. - What was vital was the military consideration. The military men and statesmen became "prisoners of the railway time-table".

  2. Study sources B and C. Which one of these sources do you trust more?

    he used to compile his report was compiled from second hand information which means that errors and certain successful parts of the attack could've been exaggerated in the relaying of the report from the frontline to Haig.

  1. Evacuation of Children

    This is a reliable source, although it was years after the event, it would have been memorable, so the account told would be accurate, and as it is an interview, there wouldn't be a clear reason why the interviewee would lie, as the date is after censorship.

  2. Why the USA Became Increasingly Involved In Vietnam

    was to persuade the population not to vote for the communist in the upcoming elections. To gain success in their aim they used a variety of methods, these included: distributing fake documents that claimed the government in North Vietnam was killing thousands of innocent lives, and the hiring of armed

  1. El Salvador and the involvement of the FMLN Strategies

    After years of brutal fighting, in April of 1980, it was clear that although the (maybe you mean the individual guerilla groups that would soon make up the FMLN...otherwise the next paragraph doesn't really make sense.)

  2. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy. ...

    It shows a man who represents Germany holding a gun, and is on top of British soldiers, the background clearly shows destruction around the place. The true colours of German soldiers are captured in this picture, which will make British people hate the Germans, as they are killing their soldiers who are defending their country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work