• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s? In this essay I am going to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s. In order to do this I will be looking at a number of sources and I will also be using my own knowledge to see if there is enough evidence to explain why there was a peace movement. To begin with is source B. This is a primary source. It is a photograph of napalm victims published during the Vietnam War. I am aware that some photos can be misleading, but in my view, I think that this source is honest because it captures the moment and it has not been staged. This is because it shows innocent children being horrifically burnt and US troops behind them not caring for them and photographing the scene. This source indirectly explains why there was a peace movement. This source has contributed to the media and it shows that media coverage was a major factor that led to an anti-war movement in the USA. Because the Vietnam War was the first ever war to be captured by the media, as soon as people saw photographs and footage from the war, they were horrified. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, as this was published in a British magazine, this may not have directly affected the US. It may not have even been seen by the US. This source alone is not fully sufficient to explain why there was an anti-war movement because I believe that this source being viewed itself would not influence the public to protest against the war and set up a peace movement. Next is source E which is a primary source. This source is a statement made by the BBC commentator, Robin Day in 1970 about the Vietnam War. In my view it is a very powerful source and it provides sound evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement. From my own knowledge I know that this war the first war to be captured by the media, so everyone had the opportunity to see all the suffering, sickness and death happening on colour screens right in front of them. To add to the overall anxiety felt by the public towards the war it also suggests that due to the "uninhibited television coverage" a democratic country will never be able fight a war "however just". Therefore, in my view, this source is extremely sufficient to explain why there was an anti-war movement during the 1960s and 1970s. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, it is biased. Finally, I feel that this source could not have had an effect on the peace movement. The reason for this is because it was published twenty years after the war in 1992 therefore, it would have not been seen by the public at the time of the war. This is insufficient evidence to show why there was a peace movement in the US. In conclusion, I believe that the majority of the sources do not provide sufficient evidence in explaining why there was a peace movement during the 1960s and 1970s. One reason for this is because some of the sources are biased; only showing one side of the story. However, in my view the most important reason why the sources were not sufficient is because there was no information showing details of where and when it was published. So one can argue, did these sources actually impact upon the US public? Nevertheless, there is one powerful source, which being viewed itself, could have led to an anti-war movement. This source links to the media coverage of the war. I think that the media coverage was a huge factor as to why people were opposed to the war. From my own knowledge I know that the introduction of the colour screen televisions played a huge role in influencing people's attitudes. ?? ?? ?? ?? Shegina Begum ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    we are not given another point of view from which we can form an opinion which is not biased. The source does show feeling in terms of desperation but this feeling would not have been portrayed when President Johnson was giving the speech.

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    Source A probably is reliable with regard to My Lai. Having watched Bilton's video I agree that these probably are the most important problems faced by the soldiers at My Lai. Bilton says One of the problems faced by US soldiers in Vietnam was that "An increasing number of recruits

  1. Vietnam War

    World War I ended in a way that it made Germany needed to revenge back. World War II ended and leaving nothing for the Axis powers to revenge. The big difference is the peace cooperation after both wars. The League of Nations which was established by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I had failed terribly.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Source C is split into 3 main points firstly Haig is talking about how the nation cannot bear to have losses and it is a fact in every war or battle no matter who has the most men or best training or best weapons there will be casualties on both sides.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    so would not serve the same length as those they had arrived with, for instance) the inexperienced recruits were often polarised by the conditions they faced - they were quite different to those they had probably been trained in, in the United States.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    they'd bring a president down if he ran out". Clearly, there is a huge difference between the way he is speaking about Vietnam in May 1964 and April 1965. This may be due to the fact that he is in a stronger political position in April 1965 because he has been re-elected.

  1. Study source K. use the sources to explain whether or not you agree with ...

    Mark selects incidents from Jesus' ministry which will help people to understand what it means to be Christian.

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    The Vietnam War was portrayed by the media as pointless as America withdrawing completely from Saigon left the non ? communist capital to fall to the North Vietnamese which was what the reason for the war; preventing Vietnam from becoming communist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work