• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s? In this essay I am going to explain why there was an anti-war movement in the United States during the late 1960s and 1970s. In order to do this I will be looking at a number of sources and I will also be using my own knowledge to see if there is enough evidence to explain why there was a peace movement. To begin with is source B. This is a primary source. It is a photograph of napalm victims published during the Vietnam War. I am aware that some photos can be misleading, but in my view, I think that this source is honest because it captures the moment and it has not been staged. This is because it shows innocent children being horrifically burnt and US troops behind them not caring for them and photographing the scene. This source indirectly explains why there was a peace movement. This source has contributed to the media and it shows that media coverage was a major factor that led to an anti-war movement in the USA. Because the Vietnam War was the first ever war to be captured by the media, as soon as people saw photographs and footage from the war, they were horrified. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, as this was published in a British magazine, this may not have directly affected the US. It may not have even been seen by the US. This source alone is not fully sufficient to explain why there was an anti-war movement because I believe that this source being viewed itself would not influence the public to protest against the war and set up a peace movement. Next is source E which is a primary source. This source is a statement made by the BBC commentator, Robin Day in 1970 about the Vietnam War. In my view it is a very powerful source and it provides sound evidence to explain why there was an anti-war movement. From my own knowledge I know that this war the first war to be captured by the media, so everyone had the opportunity to see all the suffering, sickness and death happening on colour screens right in front of them. To add to the overall anxiety felt by the public towards the war it also suggests that due to the "uninhibited television coverage" a democratic country will never be able fight a war "however just". Therefore, in my view, this source is extremely sufficient to explain why there was an anti-war movement during the 1960s and 1970s. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore, it is biased. Finally, I feel that this source could not have had an effect on the peace movement. The reason for this is because it was published twenty years after the war in 1992 therefore, it would have not been seen by the public at the time of the war. This is insufficient evidence to show why there was a peace movement in the US. In conclusion, I believe that the majority of the sources do not provide sufficient evidence in explaining why there was a peace movement during the 1960s and 1970s. One reason for this is because some of the sources are biased; only showing one side of the story. However, in my view the most important reason why the sources were not sufficient is because there was no information showing details of where and when it was published. So one can argue, did these sources actually impact upon the US public? Nevertheless, there is one powerful source, which being viewed itself, could have led to an anti-war movement. This source links to the media coverage of the war. I think that the media coverage was a huge factor as to why people were opposed to the war. From my own knowledge I know that the introduction of the colour screen televisions played a huge role in influencing people's attitudes. ?? ?? ?? ?? Shegina Begum ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    He then says that a friend compares the crimes at My Lai to the crimes committed by the Schutzstaffel (SS) or Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo) of National Socialist Germany, quoting them as saying "It was a Nazi thing.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Haig was warning the public, he was very honest in telling people this, which is why he was so liked. This part of the source does not talk about Haig's skill or efficiency as a soldier but it might help morale and that would help Britain to victory so it

  1. Why did the USA become involvedin Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    and America did not want Vietnam succumbing to communism, so they helped the French. However, it was not a very successful investment. In 1954 at Dien Bien Phu, the French were defeated by Ho Chi Minh. There were Geneva peace talks and it was decided that Vietnam would be split into two halves, a North and a South.

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    Bilton uses these points in relation to My Lai because showing how inexperienced and possibly lacking intelligence the troops are suggests why they may have not known what to expect when they went into My Lai and why they may have been led into the massacre of civilians.

  1. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    This would not have led to viewings on television because the cameras would not have been able to get into the forests and watch the fighting. However it did lead to a change in tactics to the Americans using napalm and the defoliant, Agent Orange.

  2. I think that the four most significant themes in the Vietnam War were protest ...

    no one that could go out and earn money for the family therefore the deaths in the Vietnam War were resonant to the people whose families were affected. In December 1965, Ho Chi Minh ordered a change in the way the war in the South was being fought.

  1. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    enter and capture the US embassy which was one of the main symbols of the presence of the USA in Vietnam. This was televised to 50 million homes in the USA and suggested to the public that the Communists were much stronger and determined than they had expected causing the

  2. Explain why an Anti-Vietnam war movement developed in the USA in the 1960s

    They wanted to improve the lives for American societies. In 1961, the US spent nearly $270 million in military support for Diem. The ARVN numbered 170,000 troops but the number of Vietcong was estimated at just 10,000. The question the Americans should have asked themselves was: why did it take an army of 170,000 to defeat one of just 10,000.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work