• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles broke out in Northern Ireland in 1969?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles broke out in Northern Ireland in 1969? To answer this question I shall look at each source individually and evaluate them and use knowledge of my own I will then look to link them all together to make a firm conclusion clearly stating whether there is sufficient evidence in the sources D to J. The first source, which I shall evaluate, is source D. Source D is an extract of a Roman Catholic describing her school days and the anti-protestant stance taken by the vice principal. This shows that Ireland was literally 'divided' by the nationalists and unionists. This is brought forward when the Roman Catholic says: 'She didn't hate Protestants. But her view was that they weren't Irish' This shows that they still referred to themselves as Irish and not as British and wanted Ireland to be separated from Non Irish people. ...read more.

Middle

From the Protestant point of view this is suggesting any violence, which will be caused, would be started by the Irish Catholics. The photograph of RUC officers striking a civil rights marcher, which is source H, the fifth source, which I shall evaluate, is the first source to show an example of violence. This shows the 'discrimination' of the British government on the unionists and the harassment the British government instruct the authorities to use on them. It has also given the first example of resistance by Catholics against the British government in the form of marches/protests. Source I is a photograph of crowd violence between Loyalists and civil rights marchers at Burntoilet. This is probably the best source showing an example of why the Troubles started in 1969. The photo itself is blurry and unclear. However, of the information you can gather from the photo you can see it is significant. This is an example of the confrontation put forward by both sides although the civil rights marchers were not there for a conflict. ...read more.

Conclusion

The video from this point in my eyes became biased towards the Catholics and showed the story from their point of view. So, although it informed me of the main points of 'Bloody Sunday' it didn't look professional, unbiased and informative. It did however, give a reason for retribution from the Catholics for the people killed and showed that neither side were willing to back down. So overall it was a relevant and helpful source, which showed the level of violence that occurred at what were supposed to be 'peaceful protests.' So overall I feel that the sources don't fully explain why the Troubles broke out in 1969. If I didn't have the knowledge I did have on the struggle for Ireland these sources would have been unnecessary as there is not enough detailed text to explain why the events were happening although Source J, the video showed reasons and backed them up with examples. I feel image alone is not enough to explain why the troubles broke out in full but gives a small amount of understanding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    Adams used it beautifully in his writings about Cage 11. But he also used it very seriously. He and others ... because they were in the prisons for so long, and had the time to reflect--because, remember, men of action don't have time to reflect; they're engaged in activity--they had

  2. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    The peasants sold their food they grew, and ate the potatoes; with the money they had from the food they sold, they paid for the land. When all the potato crops failed the peasants were forced to eat the other crops they grew this meant they didn't have any to

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles ...

    During the 19th century Ireland was controlled by the settlers but was under threat from home rule. This source suggests that the Protestants feared discrimination and persecution if the Catholics gained control. Source E gives some evidence as to why the Protestants ambushed Catholic protests- they were afraid the Catholics would regain power.

  2. Why Trouble Broke Out In Nothern Ireland In 1969

    The source is an important source because it is a teacher influencing young children's minds which triggers of a long term consequence of the divide between Catholics and Protestants. It shows that people cannot forget what has happened to their families overnight, leading to different interpretations on 'Bloody Sunday'.

  1. Study source J; do you agree with this portrayal of the reasons why troubles ...

    We say never, never, never, never. We prepared to lay down our lives for Ulster. I never thought I would live to see the day when 1912 was repeated." This also conveys to me partly why there was problem due to religion because Ian Paisley the man who said this statement was a religious figure, and

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the troubles ...

    This photo is useful because it helps to show that there was much tension even before 1969 as from my own knowledge I no that the RUC were Protestant and the civil rights marchers were Catholics (as they were frustrated with the lack of freedom they had in Northern Ireland)- this shows fighting had already had started to break out.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D to J to explain why the Troubles ...

    This is proof of that particular faith's followers feeling a need to teach a certain education to the children of that religion so that they would see the opposite religion as the ones in the wrong. It also shows that the view was not really B.Devlin's own, instead one that was naturally forced upon her in her childhood.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D to J to explain why the troubles ...

    Although it is a hundred years before, it is quite useful as it gives us a view from a Protestant, different from source D as it shows us a view from a Catholic. Source D exaggerates her story but source E has a picture to back up what the Protestant is telling us.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work