• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles broke out in Northern Ireland in 1969?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles broke out in Northern Ireland in 1969? To answer this question I shall look at each source individually and evaluate them and use knowledge of my own I will then look to link them all together to make a firm conclusion clearly stating whether there is sufficient evidence in the sources D to J. The first source, which I shall evaluate, is source D. Source D is an extract of a Roman Catholic describing her school days and the anti-protestant stance taken by the vice principal. This shows that Ireland was literally 'divided' by the nationalists and unionists. This is brought forward when the Roman Catholic says: 'She didn't hate Protestants. But her view was that they weren't Irish' This shows that they still referred to themselves as Irish and not as British and wanted Ireland to be separated from Non Irish people. ...read more.

Middle

From the Protestant point of view this is suggesting any violence, which will be caused, would be started by the Irish Catholics. The photograph of RUC officers striking a civil rights marcher, which is source H, the fifth source, which I shall evaluate, is the first source to show an example of violence. This shows the 'discrimination' of the British government on the unionists and the harassment the British government instruct the authorities to use on them. It has also given the first example of resistance by Catholics against the British government in the form of marches/protests. Source I is a photograph of crowd violence between Loyalists and civil rights marchers at Burntoilet. This is probably the best source showing an example of why the Troubles started in 1969. The photo itself is blurry and unclear. However, of the information you can gather from the photo you can see it is significant. This is an example of the confrontation put forward by both sides although the civil rights marchers were not there for a conflict. ...read more.

Conclusion

The video from this point in my eyes became biased towards the Catholics and showed the story from their point of view. So, although it informed me of the main points of 'Bloody Sunday' it didn't look professional, unbiased and informative. It did however, give a reason for retribution from the Catholics for the people killed and showed that neither side were willing to back down. So overall it was a relevant and helpful source, which showed the level of violence that occurred at what were supposed to be 'peaceful protests.' So overall I feel that the sources don't fully explain why the Troubles broke out in 1969. If I didn't have the knowledge I did have on the struggle for Ireland these sources would have been unnecessary as there is not enough detailed text to explain why the events were happening although Source J, the video showed reasons and backed them up with examples. I feel image alone is not enough to explain why the troubles broke out in full but gives a small amount of understanding. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. The History of Conflict in Ireland.

    That's the cynic's viewpoint. There is another viewpoint which argues that the Republican movement has come a long way in educating itself, and realizing that the armed struggle did more damage to the community it was supposed to be protecting.

  2. How Did the Catholics Grow To hate the Protestants?

    The Irish Catholic people weren't very happy about the Protestants trying to take over their land, this caused an Irish Rebellion. In 1993 the British started to try and stop the violence in Northern Ireland and they lost interest in making Ireland united with the UK.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the Troubles ...

    Source E is a Protestant cartoon showing 'Ireland' bound in ropes by a Catholic priest. The source shows the Protestants point of view about the Catholics. It suggests that Catholicism is holding down the Irish people, and is essentially mocking Catholics too tied up in their religion.

  2. Why Trouble Broke Out In Nothern Ireland In 1969

    and 2/3 of Catholics arrested, also the source does not tell you about the British Forces sent in Ireland and the march which turned into riots and violence because it is about the long term causes of trouble. I feel this source is reliable because it shows you how prejudice

  1. Study source J; do you agree with this portrayal of the reasons why troubles ...

    This statement also corresponds with a speech by Ian Paisley; a unionist, "the hearts of Ulster have been stricken with the deepest of sorrows. Mrs. Thatcher tells us that the republic has got a say in this province. We say never, never, never, never.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to explain why the troubles ...

    Another source which provides hard evidence to the Catholics argument that they were being discriminated is the photograph of RUC officers striking a civil rights marcher on 5th October 1968 (source H). The source shows a peaceful, unprotected civil rights marcher being aggressively attacked by a group of RUC officers.

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D to J to explain why the Troubles ...

    This is proof of that particular faith's followers feeling a need to teach a certain education to the children of that religion so that they would see the opposite religion as the ones in the wrong. It also shows that the view was not really B.Devlin's own, instead one that was naturally forced upon her in her childhood.

  2. Is there sufficient evidence in Sources D to J to explain why the troubles ...

    Although it is a hundred years before, it is quite useful as it gives us a view from a Protestant, different from source D as it shows us a view from a Catholic. Source D exaggerates her story but source E has a picture to back up what the Protestant is telling us.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work