• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Italy did not Make Itself, France Did

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Italy did not Make Itself, France Did Charles Alberts famous quote "Italia fara da se" (Italy will make herself, by herself) was made in 1849 when the Piedmontese army was sent into Lombardy to take it over for the first time. This quote, however, was soon shown to be an empty boast and would stay like that for another 12 years. It became obvious after the failure of Charles Alberts invasion of Lombardy that Italy would only gain independence or unity by means of outside help. If it was ot for the help of France in the war of 1859 the unification of Italy through Piedmont would have never been possible, however it was not only the work of the French that made Italy, Cavour and Garibaldi had a very large say in the future of the peninsula as well. When Cavour became Prime Minister of Piedmont after the resignation of d'Azeglio he publicly supported the people of Piedmont in wanting to get rid of Austria, however his real beliefs were not fully clear. He may have just been trying to gain support, or he genuinly wanted a unified Italy. In the 1850 however, he was quoted as saying that the concept of Italian unity was 'rubbish'. But, his public beliefs are what was important, and what had a huge impact on the future of Italy. ...read more.

Middle

The war was exceptionally violent and Austria and France, especially in the battles of Magenta and Solferino, both of which were won by the French. The Piedmontese, however made little effort to mobilise and let the French do most of the work. Also as there was still no real sense of unity and not many people were willing to risk their lives for the cause. The war stopped at an ubrupt halt when, after only securing Lombardy, Napoleon made a truce with Austria in July 1859. He was not prepared to lose any more men or money in the war. He also did not want to run the risk of Austria uniting with Prussia as they would be an almost invincible enemy. He also did not like the Idea of a strong, unified Italy right on France's borders. The main reason however, for Napoleons decision was the fact that he did not fully trust Cavour any longer because of the events in Italy at the time. All over Italy Cavour was stirring up trouble, he started up revolutions in the states of Parma and Modena and set up provisonal governments in them. The main action by Cavour to really lose the trust of Napoleon was his attempt to take over Tuscany, which was not included in the Plombieres scheme for Piedmontese expansion. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Cavour was very much against an attack on Rome as this would cause widespread trouble, especially with the French. Cavour was also aware that most of the Thousand (by now much more than that) were Mazzinians, and being Mazzinians they would be opposed to the Church and its teachings, and that they would have no problem attacking Rome. Cavour therefore sent an army from Piedmont to Rome in order to stop Garibaldi, however when the two armies met, Garibaldi saluted Victor Emmanuel as "the first King of Italy"2. Garibaldi then soon after oficially handed over all of his conquests to Victor Emmanuel and all of Italy was unified under Piedmont apart from Rome and the patrimony of St. Peter. There is no doubt that without the help of France Italy would have not even gotten close to unifiacation. There would have been no war of 1859, and if there was Italy would have been soundly beaten. But, thanks to the French Piedmont gained the first piece of the jig saw in Lombardy and this was a stepping stone to much greater things. However, if it was not for the work of Garibaldi, Sicily and Naples would not have been annexed to Piedmont until much later. Most of the work was done by Cavour and he orchestrated the annexations with many of the States. 1 The Unification of Italy 1817-70 by Adrina Stiles 2 Quotation of Garibaldi form The Unifiacation of Italy 1817-70 by Adrina Stiles ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    Therefore, Mazzini was idealistic and unpractical in his ideas. The extent to which the revolutionaries were divided is evident in Mazzini's dislike of Nicola Fabrizi, the leader of the Italian Legion. The Italian Legion was designed to be the military wing of the Young Italy movement and thus it can be seen that even though Mazzini and Fabrizi were ideologically similar they still wouldn't cooperate.

  2. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    * The unification should be achieved by Prussia alone, not by the cooperation of German states (because this was unrealistic). * Strengthening the German Confederation * After Metternich fell from power in 1848, nationalism aroused in most of the German states, especially in the northern part.

  1. To what extent was Cavour a leader of the unification of Italy?

    (in an armistice on the 24th June with Napoleon behind Cavour's back). Cavour did indeed reclaim Lombardy and although Napoleon III betrayed him in the treaty of Villafranca, the War did establish a sense of hope and patriotism amongst the public.

  2. To what extent does Cavour deserve his reputation as the architect of Italian Unification?

    The country was undoubtedly disjointed. Economically the South was considerably poorer when compared to the semi-industrialized north. Transport was a major issue as was language and communication, under 5% of the country spoke what today would be recognised as Italian. It was under these conditions that the beginning of a "government cover-up which led to

  1. ITALIAN UNIFICATION

    Since the Prime Minister of the time, D'Azeglio, did not like administration work he let Cavour do it, which means that Cavour was doing most of the day to day running of the State. By 1852 he started disagreeing with the right wing government and allied with the political leader

  2. There are many significant events and victories that surround Garibaldi's speech that was made ...

    In 1854 he once again came back to Italy after exile, just five years before the Austo-Sardinian War broke out. In 1859 he was appointed major general and formed a group of volunteers (soldiers). With his soldiers, Garibaldi set out to free Italy from foreign invasion and reunite the country.

  1. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    However, on the other hand, Prussia was not only contrasting with the Austrian weaknesses but it was experiencing a period of an overall trend of ascendancy which, despite various setbacks such as the failure of the Prussian Union Plan, propagated her to a favourable position.

  2. What were the gains and losses between 1861-1870 of the creation of Italy?

    The legal system was unified and imposed on all, except in Tuscany and the civil code was finally adopted in 1865. Piedmont's religious laws formally separated church and state and inspired the pope to issue a decree in 1868 forbidding Catholics to participate in the political life of the new state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work