• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jack the ripper coursework - question 1 & 2

Extracts from this document...


Study Source A What can you learn from source A about the murders of Martha Tabrum and Polly Nicholls? From Source A, I can infer that the article is written to sensationalise the recent events and to shock the audience of the time. The source is an article from the East End observer and uses lots of emotive language to emphasise the importance of the recent incidents, for example it states that the events "startled London". The source claims that the killings "are the work of a demented being". This suggests that the author of the source found the events so shocking and extraordinary that he/she believed it could only be done by someone insane. Source A also tells us that these victims were the "poorest of the poor" insinuating that they were the vulnerable destitutes of Whitechapel. ...read more.


Another inference I can make is that the source suggests that the two murders were linked. It implies that they were both around the same time and both attacks were targeted at the "poorest of the poor". This implies that it was only the destitute people of Whitechapel were attacked; and in this case, the prostitutes. The weakness of the source is that it is clearly over exaggerated in order to shock the readers and to sell papers. Study Sources A, B and C Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B about the Ripper murders? Explain your answers Source C is a doctor's report written by Dr. Frederick Blackwell of how the victim, Elizabeth Stride, was found after her death; written to inform. ...read more.


Source C has lots of detail as it is written by a professional who had seen the body, whereas source B, which is also written by a professional, lacks the same amount of detail as source C. From source C, I can infer that the author of the source thought that the murderer was very skilled at what he was doing as it mentions how he cuts the windpipe "completely in two". Source B supports this information and suggest that the injuries have been made by someone who had considerable "anatomical skill and knowledge." From the sources, I can see that Source B supports the information from source C, but Source A doesn't. I think this may be because Source's B and C are both written by professionals who actually viewed the body at the scene of the crime, whereas source A is a newspaper article, written to sensationalise the events. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Holocaust Coursework question 1

    These degrading actions effectively made Jews into a public laughing stock. Also during this time, on May 10th 1933, there was a mass burning of books in Berlin and throughout Germany. Though not a major turning point in the treatment towards the Jews it did have two important affects.

  2. terroirsm question 1

    past events which have shown this, however it doesn't look like that America and their allies have either the maturity or common sense to follow in the IRAs footsteps to eliminating terrorism.

  1. Jack the Ripper questions and answers.

    The atmosphere in Whitechapel in the summer of 1888 was very tense and people were afraid to leave their homes. On Friday 31 August 1888, a woman named Polly Nicholls was found dead in Buck's Row by a man named Charles Cross.

  2. Law and order in 19th century London - Case Study: The search for "Jack ...

    For example, only butchers, doctors and slaughterers (despite the coroner's report which stated "No mere slaughterer of animals could have carried out these operations.") The police also targeted people with 'criminal' facial characteristics (this was in accordance with the Darwinian Theory which was popular at the time).

  1. Jack the Ripper Source Analysis Coursework

    In this respect, the police were unlucky. During the 1880's, forensic science was poorly developed. The police did not have the technology to gather convictable evidence such as DNA or fingerprints; they couldn't even differentiate between human and animal blood - so if they found blood on the possessions/clothing of a suspect, they couldn't prove it belonged to a victim.

  2. Jack The Ripper : Assignment 1 : Objective 1

    murders in 1888 caused a great suspicion and attracted a lot of attention. This was due to many reasons. The first being the way in which the people were murdered. People knew the extent to how the people were grotesquely killed and how the murderer got away and this attracted

  1. Jack the Ripper coursework questions

    city of London and the City Police responsible for patrolling the inner city of London. Both the Met Police and the City Police tried their utmost to put a stop to the murders but in doing so as separate organisations and with lack of team work and evidence sharing they failed.

  2. Irish Coursework

    However, source F was not bias as it was drawn based of government statistics. This would mean that it was fair and the statistics were 'pure'. To answer the question we must look at both long and short term evidence, most of the sources are long term however, the last two are not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work