• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jack the ripper - Source related work.

Extracts from this document...


2) Study Source A, B and C Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Source A and B about the Ripper murders? Explain your answer. Source C supports the evidence of Source B but not Source A because this can be explained by Source B and Source C being more precise and giving a very detailed account of the murder but also both bodies being analysed by two different medical examiners with anatomical knowledge which shows us that Source C supports Source B because of the precise detail used in both murders which have been described similarly by two different medical workers with anatomical knowledge but also on two different bodies which show us that the murderer used similar tactics to kill both of his victims and in spite Source B and ...read more.


Source C also supports Source A because both sources are comparing and regarding the apparent lack of motive in the murders because Source A mentions how the victims are poor and by my knowledge they were all prostitutes which shows they had little money which the source shows both in Source A and C which they had little money which I drew a conclusion that the murders had a apparent lack of motive. However Source C contradicts Source A because Martha Tabram had meaningless cuts where as both Source B and C suggests that there are precise and meaningful use of the knife on both victims but the source preferred the stabs in Source B and C of a murderer with anatomical skill and not just meaningless cuts which occur in Martha Tabram's murder. ...read more.


Source C supported Source B mainly just because of the similarity of the medical reports and the precise detail of both medical workers of the cuts and stabs in both bodies. Also I believe that mainly Source C supported Source B mainly because both sources were medical reports so no words could be changed around because they were written up by medical workers where as Source A is from a newspaper article so all the words are changed in source because of publicity reasons and a way for them to make money so no way would Source C support Source A because Source C is a medical report and Source A is newspaper article which are never true so both sources can never ever relate just because of the origin of where the source came from. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

    Woodfull remained defiant throughout the entire series. Even when he himself was struck and had to be removed from the field, he still had the audacity to declare to an apologetic 'Plum' Warner "There are two teams out there. One is playing cricket and the other is not"35.

  2. Jack the Ripper Coursework

    Ostrog's height (five feet and eleven inches) and age also tend to exonerate him. His exact date of birth is not known. But some sources make him nearly 60 in 1888 and by 1891, less than three years after the murders, his physical condition was described as 'much impaired' in hospital records.

  1. Eyewitness - source related review

    It was published by the police in an attempt to glean information from the public about the identity of Jack the Ripper. Source G is Part of a letter from the Home Secretary to the Mile End Vigilance Committee on 17 September 1888; it concerns the use of reward money for the information about Jack the Ripper.

  2. Jack the Ripper - source related questions and answers.

    The differences between source C and A are that source A is a newspaper article which purpose is to sell copies and source C is a report on the body which purpose is to inform the reader. Also source A writes about Martha Tabram and Polly Nicholls whilst source C is the description of the body of Elizabeth Long.

  1. Jack the Ripper - source related questions.

    These are useful in helping us to understand why the Ripper was able to avoid capture, although the reliability of these sources may be questionable. In source D, Elizabeth Long was shown to be an unreliable person, for an example of this in her statement she does not sound reliable by her sayings when describing this male; "I think..."

  2. Jack The Ripper - source related study.

    out by someone who had a high level of knowledge concerning the human body, for example a doctor. But source C states how just a single wound to the neck killed Elizabeth Stride. I interpreted this evidence and came to the conclusion that anyone could have carried out the murder.

  1. Jack the ripper - source related study.

    Another similarity that is evident throughout the sources A, B and C is that all 3 mention or imply the use of a knife or similar weapon; source B tells us of how the killer knew "how he should use a knife".

  2. Jack the Ripper - source related analysis.

    There are some major points which sources A and C disagree on, such as; the articles suggestion about the murderer being a wild & deranged creature whereas it is contradicted in the report where the killer is described as a person who knows exactly what he is doing as there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work