• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Jack the ripper - Source related work.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2) Study Source A, B and C Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Source A and B about the Ripper murders? Explain your answer. Source C supports the evidence of Source B but not Source A because this can be explained by Source B and Source C being more precise and giving a very detailed account of the murder but also both bodies being analysed by two different medical examiners with anatomical knowledge which shows us that Source C supports Source B because of the precise detail used in both murders which have been described similarly by two different medical workers with anatomical knowledge but also on two different bodies which show us that the murderer used similar tactics to kill both of his victims and in spite Source B and ...read more.

Middle

Source C also supports Source A because both sources are comparing and regarding the apparent lack of motive in the murders because Source A mentions how the victims are poor and by my knowledge they were all prostitutes which shows they had little money which the source shows both in Source A and C which they had little money which I drew a conclusion that the murders had a apparent lack of motive. However Source C contradicts Source A because Martha Tabram had meaningless cuts where as both Source B and C suggests that there are precise and meaningful use of the knife on both victims but the source preferred the stabs in Source B and C of a murderer with anatomical skill and not just meaningless cuts which occur in Martha Tabram's murder. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source C supported Source B mainly just because of the similarity of the medical reports and the precise detail of both medical workers of the cuts and stabs in both bodies. Also I believe that mainly Source C supported Source B mainly because both sources were medical reports so no words could be changed around because they were written up by medical workers where as Source A is from a newspaper article so all the words are changed in source because of publicity reasons and a way for them to make money so no way would Source C support Source A because Source C is a medical report and Source A is newspaper article which are never true so both sources can never ever relate just because of the origin of where the source came from. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. History Extension Major Work- The 1932-33 Bodyline Series

    'The Bradman Years: Australian Cricket 1918-1948'.The Book Company International, Sydney, NSW, 1995 Pollard, Jack. 'The History of Australian Cricket', Pelham Books, 1992 Newspaper Articles: Lane, Daniel 2 December 2006, 'Larwood's Legacy? A fine player and true gentleman', Sport section Sydney Morning Herald, 8 February 2004, 'It just wasn't cricket' Letter

  2. Eyewitness - source related review

    It was published by the police in an attempt to glean information from the public about the identity of Jack the Ripper. Source G is Part of a letter from the Home Secretary to the Mile End Vigilance Committee on 17 September 1888; it concerns the use of reward money for the information about Jack the Ripper.

  1. Jack the Ripper - source related questions.

    "...but I cannot be sure," "...as far as I could tell." "...as well as I could make out." She describes what the man is wearing, a deerstalker hat and a dark coat, and she suggests that he was a man over forty and that he was tall, she also mentions

  2. Jack The Ripper - source related study.

    You do not have to be skilled, just mentally disturbed (source a), to commit such a murder. So taking all the above information into account I have come to the conclusion that in some ways source c supports the evidence given by A and B, but in other ways differs.

  1. Jack the ripper - source related study.

    Sources D and E are very useful in is understanding the state and of Whitechapel at the time of the murders and in effect how the Ripper was able to avoid capture. One of the most telling factors in the Ripper being able to avoid capture was there were

  2. Jack the Ripper - source related analysis.

    As the reader begins to read the evidence, the first thought that strikes the reader is that the criminal was of foreign origin as she describes him as a person of a "dark complexion". She depicts an image of herself which seems to be quite resentful towards foreigners living in

  1. Jack The Ripper -Source based work.

    Therefore the police would take any evidence they could get very seriously. The fact that the police went out searching for a forieghn looking man suggests that they believed Long's story so to them it must have been very usefull and convincing evidence.

  2. Jack the Ripper Coursework

    This man was 'respectable' in appearance. He looked about 28, stood five feet seven or eight inches tall, and had a small dark moustache. He wore a dark deerstalker hat and a black diagonal cut-away coat and he was carrying a parcel wrapped up in newspaper.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work