Jack the ripper - Source related work.

murderer used similar tactics to kill both of his victims and in spite Source B and C are so similar that it led the police to discard Martha Tabram as one of Jack The Ripper victims because the methods used to kill Martha Tabram was not as precise as the murders of Polly Nicholls and Elizabeth Stride. Source A is more of a news article where as Source B and C are more similar in spite of the different victims but both were killed very similarly and also Is different from Source A. Where as Martha Tabram was a different case and Source B and C were very similar. The newspaper article in Source A got it wrong and really Source B and C are similar and Martha Tabram was no way near related because Source B and C were very precise and in Martha’s case she was just butchered up. Source C also supports Source A because both sources are comparing and regarding the apparent lack of motive in the murders because Source A mentions how the victims are poor and by my knowledge they were all prostitutes which shows they had little money which the source shows both in Source A and C which they had little money which I drew a conclusion that the murders had a apparent lack of motive. However Source C contradicts Source A because Martha Tabram had meaningless cuts where as both Source B and C suggests that there are precise and meaningful use of the knife on both victims but the source preferred the stabs in Source B and C of a murderer with anatomical skill and not just meaningless cuts which occur in Martha Tabram’s murder. Also Source C contradicts Source A by Source A suggesting a “Demented being” committing the murder, where as Source B and C stating otherwise, that it was work of a skilful, smart and a person with very good and precise anatomical knowledge of where the organs and precise places of the organs in peoples bodies and Source A really don’t explain how the Ripper committed his murders in detail where as Source B And C does so really Source C contradicts Source A where it is suggested that the murder was committed by a demented being but really by a cool, smart and skilful person. Source C supports mainly Source B because of the similarity between the medical reports and the way the murders was committed but hardly Source C supported evidence in Source A but mainly Source C supported Source B mainly just because of the similarity of the medical reports and the precise detail of both medical workers of the cuts and stabs in both bodies. Also I believe that mainly Source C supported Source B mainly because both sources were medical reports so no words could be changed around because they were written up by medical workers where as Source A is from a newspaper article so all the words are changed in source because of publicity reasons and a way for them to make money so no way would Source C support Source A because Source C is a medical report and Source A is newspaper article which are never true so both sources can never ever relate just because of the origin of where the source came from.