• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Jack the Ripper - What can you learn from Source A about the murder of Martha Tabram and Polly Nicholls?

Extracts from this document...


Amandeep Dhaliwal 10W2 Jack the Ripper Coursework Assignment 1) Study Source A What can you learn from Source A about the murder of Martha Tabram and Polly Nicholls? Source A says that the victims Martha and Polly were the 'poorest of poor' and were from London. This suggests that the murderer is targeting poor women in the London area. The content of source A also shows that the murderer had 'no adequate motive' in committing newspaper may be trying to create panic in the East End of London. Source A was written when Jack the Ripper had committed his first murders. At the time the source would have created considerable alarm among the poor East End public. In the Nineteenth Century there was a large poor population. This suggests they were vulnerable victims for Jack the Ripper. also affected by the journalist who wrote the source. They may have individual experiences that affect their writing. The source is limited as evidence. The source says 'the crimes were committed by a demented being,' this is only an opinion. This source is also useful as it is a primary source this can be seen from its nature and origin. This is important because it allows the reader to understand the views at the time of the murders. The source is only useful if it is used with other sources. Other sources 2) Study Sources A, B and C Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B about the Ripper murders? Explain your answer. Source C suggests that the Ripper murders were very brutal and very violent. It also suggests that the killer knew what he was doing. ...read more.


Source F's nature shows that it is a police leaflet published after the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes. The purpose of this leaflet is to inform the police the public of Whitechapel to come forward with any evidence about the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes. The significance of this leaflet in showing how the police tried to catch the Ripper is that the police were now appealing for information regarding suspicious characters 'should you know of any person to whom suspicion is attached, you are earnestly requested to communicate...' This leaflet only gives the dates of the murders of Elizabeth Stride and Kate Eddowes, and it is very vague about where the murders took place. Another point source F shows is that the police's lines of enquiry were running out and they needed other sources of help from the Whitechapel public, as their other methods were failing. The source also shows that the police continued to conduct their investigation in Whitechapel. This means that they were still keeping their enquiry very localised. Finally, source F shows that the police were unsuccessful because source F is a limited way of helping the police. The leaflet does not include any information about the killer like any clear description of the murderer. Source G's nature is a letter to the Mile End Vigilance Committee from the Home Secretary. The origin is from 17th September 1888 which was after the murders in Whitechapel; by Jack the Ripper. The purpose of this letter to the Mile End Vigilance Committee was to persuade them that a reward for giving evidence to find the Ripper was not allowed. ...read more.


The article shown in source A may have been misleading to the police force, 'each murder suggests the idea that both crimes are the work of a demented being.' This article may have led the police to the wrong type of suspects. Source D can also be used to show that the police weren't to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper. Source D is a witness account from Elizabeth Long who was describing the man seen talking to Annie Chapman before she was murdered. This witness account has many flaws and the witness does appear to be convinced of what she saw, 'I think he was wearing a dark coat but I cannot be sure.' The evidence given by Elizabeth Long could also have led the police down the wrong line of investigation. 'He looked to me like a foreigner, as well as I could make out.' This shows that the police were wasting resources and time and potentially allowing the Ripper to escape from the police and commit another murder. In conclusion, the police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper. This can be mainly seen from the sources I have studied and also from my own knowledge. The sources that show the police were not to blame for capturing Jack the Ripper are weak. Sources such as E, F, G and H demonstrate that the police enquiry was flawed. The sources show that the police ignored key informants who had good advice for them. Using my own knowledge I can see that the police were to blame because of their lack of experience with such types of investigations. This inexperience allowed Jack the Ripper to avoid capture. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. The Iceman Murder

    The only way to do this is to change the direction of the arrow. Otzi succeeded but it was very painful and he had a big blood loss. After being shot, Otzi stumbled up the mountains in about 20 minutes.

  2. 'The police were not completely to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper', use ...

    to take pictures of the scene usually by drawing what they saw. This was not a very effective method, because things could have been missed out and detailing would not have been accurate. Photography was also used, however it was a new invention and therefore there were a lot of disadvantages.

  1. Jack The Ripper Assignment

    The precision and skill shown in the cuts suggest the killer had a good anatomical knowledge, however, source A states it had been the work of a 'demented being', which contradicts this theory, and the evidence in source C. Sources B and C agree with each other because they are

  2. 'The police were to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper.'

    Lack of technology also extended to detective work, which was still primitive at the time.


    The origin of the source must also be questioned. Elizabeth Long exaggerated the man or may have lied and is possibly not correct for a reward from the police that would benefit her. Secondly, the police were to blame for not capturing the Ripper. Source E is an article published in a local newspaper after the first two murders.

  2. Jack the Ripper Coursework - failures of the police, living conditions and the character ...

    and "as well as I could make out". This would be difficult for the police to work with. In conclusion, I believe it was the fault of the police force that the Ripper was never caught. However, it wasn't their fault completely as they didn't have all the new ways

  1. Jack the ripper - What can you learn from source A about the murders ...

    was wearing a 'deerstalker hat', 'a dark coat' and was a 'foreigner'. Source E is newspaper article after the murders of Polly Nicholls and Annie Chapman. It says that the police were told they needed more police officers on the streets even before the first murder but still didn't do anything after the first murders.

  2. Jack the Ripper - source related questions and answers.

    Source B shows that the ripper knew what he was doing, the report states "The injuries have been made by someone who had considerable anatomical skill and knowledge" this brings forward the idea that the ripper was clever and would've cleared the evidence left behind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work