• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

John D. Rockefeller wrote source E at the start of the introduction of prohibition, at this point he was very much in favour of prohibition.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

John D. Rockefeller wrote source E at the start of the introduction of prohibition, at this point he was very much in favour of prohibition. He describes how he had changed his opinion due to increasing crime and drinking. He was originally for prohibition because he didn't want his employs coming in ill after a night of heavy drinking. Source F, which was written by John F Krane, was the first prohibition commission so he would have to be for prohibition due to his job. He says how he will be enforced everywhere. I believe source E is more reliable as evidence because it says how even the most orthodox Drys changed their views about prohibition. Where on the other hand source F just shows one side of the story and is written by a government official so it will be biased towards prohibition. Source G shows that the agents who were enforcing Prohibition from 1921 to 1929 had uncrossed the amount of skills and spirits they had seizing. ...read more.

Middle

The sources may seem to prove that prohibition was successful but with other factors reading to be included and questions not being answered. I believe these sources are there own can't prove that prohibition was either success or a failure. Source I is a cartoon of several people in high profile jobs within the American government and the police. They are standing with their hands behind them waiting for a backhanded or bribe. The title for this cartoon is "The National Gesture", which implies that everyone was being bribed by gangsters or speakeasy owners. Source J is written by a policeman writing about the amount of bribes that was going on in Chicago at this time. He says a saloon owner offered him free drinks as if there wasn't any prohibition in affect. He also says "it was a conspiracy and my superior officers were involved in it." ...read more.

Conclusion

Due to the feet that their tables can not have views or opines. Source I, which is a cartoon, has pictures of several people in authority gesturing a bribe or backhanded. So this would suggest that the artist believes that a large majority of the country were getting bribes so would support the above-mentioned view. Source J is a diary sort of extract from a policeman. Taking about the sort of criminal goings on in Chicago and how people reacted. So i believe the policeman does indeed support the view that prohibitions failure was inevitable. Because there was so many people getting bribed and injured, in gang related incidents, that the government had to remove prohibition before there was to many incidents. I believe the fowling sources A, B, E, I, J all support the vein that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. They all have strong arguments, but most of all is source A with the a quote which i believe sums up prohibition, "no earlier law ha gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History - Prohibition

    For example, Al Capone, in Chicago, built up a network of corrupt officials including local government workers, judges, lawyers and Prohibition agents and even the mayor, by bribing them to 'turn a blind eye'. As these Prohibition agents were not paid very well by the government, many were willing to

  2. Prohibition - source based questions.

    Gangsters like John Torrio were treated like celebrities. He escaped the law by buying 'protection' of Mayor Bill Thompson and ensured his political support by rigging elections. Prohibition did fail to meet its aims because the amount of alcohol consumed during prohibition increased. In New York the amount of places to drink rose from 15,000 legal saloons before

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    As the source is in table form, it is useful as the information would not be biased. But the information could be interpreted differently, causing confusion. 4) Source D is an extract from the American Issues, an anti - alcohol paper, published on the 16th of January 1920.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    but is made to entertain people so the film company can make a profit. It is also romantically linked with Elliot Ness and his wife. However, was Nesses family really like this? This prooves that it is not targeting a documentary audience. It is made to attract a vast audience.

  1. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    In conclusion, both of the artists are for prohibition and want men to stop drinking by emotionally blackmailing them. Also from the beginning of prohibition, the WCTU has been for prohibition. C) Study sources E and F Which of these sources is more reliable as evidence about Prohibition?

  2. Sources E and F are pieces written by two different people about prohibition. ...

    Although Rockefeller also has a strong opinion he states a lot of useful factual information as well, such as, "drinking generally increased" and "the speakeasy replaced the saloon". Rockefeller's source also gives a lot more information because he had the advantage of hindsight.

  1. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    The people of America saw this from the propaganda that the ASL had printed and start away stopped drinking their beer. Many of the saloons where owned by the breweries and they both didn't like what the ASL where saying.

  2. Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

    after there were 32,000, as backed up by source B; "by 1928 there were more than 30,000". From bootlegging, illegal drinking and commoners alike openly violating laws, came more crime and corruption. Without prohibition there may not be a bootlegging industry at all.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work