• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kristallnacht - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Assignment two, Question A Any Historian studying Kristallnacht would find sources A and B very useful as they both say who is responsible for the night. Although the person who is said to be responsible in each source is different, they both show that the Nazis were clearly against the Jews and this would give the Historian a good idea of which source is more likely to be accurate. Source A's provenance tells us it is a summary by Fritz Hesse who was a journalist working for Hitler, this means he would know quite a bit about him so his source is likely to have some truth in it. The source was also written in 1954 which is many years after Hitler died so he would not be bothered about writing the truth because nothing would happen. If Hitler was still alive he would have been scared to write the truth and Hitler would have probably told him what he had to write, on the other hand, it was along time ago and the details may not be fresh in his mind so there could be some inaccurate detail in it. ...read more.

Middle

This source would be useful because it tells the historian that the SA and Goebbels were responsible for the attacks and that the Nazis were against the Jews a lot. Source B is not very reliable, but it is still very useful to the Historian. It is a secret report prepared by the Nazi party supreme court after the events of Kristallnacht so it is the official Nazi line, this means the story might have been change completely to make the Nazis look good and not responsible because they knew the German people would not approve. The source says that the report is from after the attacks, but they are announced to everyone by Goebbels in the evening which does not really fit in. The source is blaming the German people for the anti-Jewish demonstrations and Goebbels told the party leaders about this at a social evening. The source also says that if people do start 'spur of the moment' attacks on the Jews it will not be stopped. ...read more.

Conclusion

to do with the attacks he says that the Nazis would not be allowed to organise such demonstrations but they would not be stopped. These similarities would be very useful to the historian because he would have something that he knows is most likely true, like the Nazis disliking the Jews a lot which would help him decide what he thinks is more accurate. The source that would be more reliable is source A, but source B would be more useful to the Historian because it is more detailed as it says what happened on the night which would be reliable because the Nazis were not blamed so it wouldn't matter to them what was written because it didn't make them look bad, it also lets the Historian know that the Jews were not liked by the Nazis because of the one line at the end of the source so the historian could judge who was to blame for himself. Source A only tells the historian who is to blame and does not really give a description of the kind of things that were done on the night. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    It is like a warning to not follow them. The book is trying to convince the readers that van der Lubbe was the one who set the fire. This is why the Nazi author put him on the cover along with the fire.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It says that on the ninth of November there had "been anti-Jewish demonstrations in parts of Munich during which Jewish shops had been destroyed and synagogues set on fire". No names were mentioned as to who started them. However, it does say that "The Fuhrer, at Goebbles suggestion, had decided such demonstrations were not to be organised by the party."

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    The events written about in Source D describe the situation before and leading up to Kristallnacht and give the impression that there had been unrest building up amongst the German people, against the Jews, for some time before; 'there was unrest amongst the masses'.

  2. The German reactions to Nazi anti-Jewish policies - source related study.

    and cheered on the killing. Source C also says that some people in fact did not agree and were opposed to the regime and did not agree with the killing of the Jews. In on incident Germans were seen to be making passages through the crowds for the Jews to escape through.

  1. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    contradict each other, therefore making both source very ambiguous and quite unreliable. B) This is an account by David Buffman, the American Consul in Leipzig and he wrote this account from his own experiences at the time. Straight away we are given impressions of violence.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    the time was out of favour with Hitler was trying to win back his support." Factors that doubt the reliability of source A is that it is a summary and therefore a reinterpreted version of the events that took place.

  1. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    The similarities between the cartoons are that they both blame the Nazis for Kristallnacht and have a Nazi in uniform holding a weapon and look although they have just killed a Jew. In both cartoons, there is no sign that the German people were part of the attacks, in source

  2. Munich Coursework Assignment

    The following month, Hitler summoned the Austrian Chancellor Schuschnigg to Berlin and demanded a share in the government for the Austrian Nazi's. Hitler threatened Schuschnigg with a German invasion of Austria. Consequently, Schuschnigg agreed to meet Hitler's demands, perhaps to escape a war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work