• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' - How far do these sources support this claim?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Question: Study all the Sources. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people.' How far do these sources support this claim? Answer: There are 3 different theories between these 6 different sources. Source A states how it was Goebbels idea whilst Source H agrees with this. Source B, D and I both state how Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event from the German public. It is hard to obtain which Sources are reliable and which aren't. This is because every source was written from someone who had their own opinions and this makes all of the sources biased, although some more than others. However the most popular theory is that it was a planned event by the Nazi's. Sources C, E, F and G both back this up. ...read more.


This is not a reliable source. Anti-Semitism views were considered normal at those times so of course they were going to be treated badly. The German-Jew also would be biased as he was the victim and he is clearly angry with his oppressors. Source I is from a conversation between Hitler and the wife of his favourite Architect. He does not blame anyone either merely saying "the people responsible have destroyed everything for me". He also mentions how he had hoped to come to an understanding with France. If this was true then why did he start a war with them just one year later? Sources C, E, F and G agree that it was a planned event by the Nazi party. Source C is a very reliable account of what happened. ...read more.


Sources F and G are cartoons that both show the Nazi's as the persecutors and both highlight the killing and destruction that took place. They are from the same time as Kristallnacht and both highlight that the German public did little in the event. I conclude that Kristallnacht was never "a spontaneous event by the German people". I say this because the evidence that backs it up is misleading, confusing and from unreliable sources. I believe that it was a planned event by the Nazi's although I cannot say if Hitler or Goebbels planned it because the information provided is too misleading. The evidence claiming that it was a planned event by the Nazi's is strong, reliable and fits in with the other sources. For example Sources C and E almost mirror each other, giving detailed information about who was involved and what they did. The two sources compliment each other so well that it is hard to ignore them as unreliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far were the German people responsible for the Holocaust?

    The newly elected Iranian Prime minister has denied the Holocaust and openly vowed to destroy Israel. These are examples of how evidence can be misinterpreted to give a totally different account of an event. Barnes talks about the Allies having more brutal methods to their victims, this gives way to

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    who really knows about the Reichstag building is I, for I set fire to it'. Goering was a Nazi, so if he set fire to it, this quote supports the interpretation. However, this source may be unreliable because it has been taken from a trial where Halder would be trying

  1. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    Britain's attitude to Abyssinia is shown in different ways through each source (D and E). In source D, we are given the impression that Britain does not really care much about Abyssinia.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Source A is reliable because the historian who wrote this was at the dinner and it was written after 1945, when they were no governmental pressures to make the Nazis look either really good or really bad. The person quoted in Source H, Goering does have pressures - he will

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Source E states quite clearly that these acts of violence and house breaking were carried out by SS men who were supplied with the necessary equipment and local knowledge by the Police. So clearly the whole operation was planned and carried out by the State.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    Source D endorses this by mentioning that in the weeks preceding Kristallnacht, there had already been 'signs of unrest amongst the masses'; here, the use of language suggests that the ordinary Germans were the 'masses' who would eventually become out of hand, and spontaneously start the great riots against the Jews.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Study all the sources. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people'. How far do these sources support that claim? To determine whether the statement, 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' we must examine each source carefully.

  2. History Sourcework - 'Kristallnact was a spontaneous event by the German People' How far ...

    This account is styled to look as if it is impartial with its language being neutral and very formal. The Nazi Party however tightly controlled the Supreme Court meaning that any judgement or paper that came out of the court had been checked and doctored if necessary to make sure that it followed Nazi propaganda or views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work