• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' - How far do these sources support this claim?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question: Study all the Sources. 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people.' How far do these sources support this claim? Answer: There are 3 different theories between these 6 different sources. Source A states how it was Goebbels idea whilst Source H agrees with this. Source B, D and I both state how Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event from the German public. It is hard to obtain which Sources are reliable and which aren't. This is because every source was written from someone who had their own opinions and this makes all of the sources biased, although some more than others. However the most popular theory is that it was a planned event by the Nazi's. Sources C, E, F and G both back this up. ...read more.

Middle

This is not a reliable source. Anti-Semitism views were considered normal at those times so of course they were going to be treated badly. The German-Jew also would be biased as he was the victim and he is clearly angry with his oppressors. Source I is from a conversation between Hitler and the wife of his favourite Architect. He does not blame anyone either merely saying "the people responsible have destroyed everything for me". He also mentions how he had hoped to come to an understanding with France. If this was true then why did he start a war with them just one year later? Sources C, E, F and G agree that it was a planned event by the Nazi party. Source C is a very reliable account of what happened. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sources F and G are cartoons that both show the Nazi's as the persecutors and both highlight the killing and destruction that took place. They are from the same time as Kristallnacht and both highlight that the German public did little in the event. I conclude that Kristallnacht was never "a spontaneous event by the German people". I say this because the evidence that backs it up is misleading, confusing and from unreliable sources. I believe that it was a planned event by the Nazi's although I cannot say if Hitler or Goebbels planned it because the information provided is too misleading. The evidence claiming that it was a planned event by the Nazi's is strong, reliable and fits in with the other sources. For example Sources C and E almost mirror each other, giving detailed information about who was involved and what they did. The two sources compliment each other so well that it is hard to ignore them as unreliable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It depicts Tsar Nicholas II 'who had encouraged attacks against Jews during his reign (1894-1917), who is looking down from what I assume is heaven. Communists murdered him and his family in 1918. Nicholas is saying to the Nazi who stands below him, 'Attacking the Jews did not do me any good, my Fascist friend'.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    The image presented in Source G clearly disagrees with the above quote, as it presents the German people as powerless in the current circumstances, represented by an innocent woman, vulnerable in the midst of the corruption surrounding her. It contradicts the above claim to the extent that it even identifies

  1. How far were the German people responsible for the Holocaust?

    Post-war Holocaust denial was very prominent in its affront to the evidence and those that had survived or spoken out against the Holocaust. The Nuremberg war crime trials, where prominent Nazi officials were tried for war crimes is just one of the glaring sources of evidence that the Holocaust happened.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Also, the fact that it was written in 1954 makes it less reliable. I think this because it was written 16 years after the event and therefore ones memory may be blurred. Fritz Hesse was a journalist and he could have made some of these things up to make his

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    well it is able to disprove the interpretation making the statement better supported. Source A can also support the interpretation of it being a Communist plot. When it says 'Every Communist must be shot or hanged. Everybody supporting the Communists must be arrested.'

  2. The Italian Conquest of Abyssinia: How far was the LoN to blame?

    Secondly, the fact that the speech indicates his love for power would also worry the league as they often struggle with situations whereby a powerful country has done something. A perfect example of this is the incident of Vilna. Vilna was awarded to Poland solely on the basis that they

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Question Five Source H blames Goebbles because the person who said the account, Goering, claimed that "it was not acceptable to me [Goering] that he [Goebbles] should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much property of economic value".

  2. Study all the sources.

    Also, World War II started in 1939, and the Nazis would not have been bothered about an event like kristallnacht when they got a war to concentrate on. This means it was most likely to have been wrote before 1939.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work