• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kristallnacht - Which of the two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find more useful.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kristallnacht (A) Which of the two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find more useful. "Hitler squealed with delight and slapped his thigh with enthusiasm", suggesting that Hitler was happy with the idea of the attacking of the Jews but that Hitler did not plan it. Goebbels could have been behind Kristallnacht because he was out of favour with Hitler and thought that this idea might save him. The Nazis prepared a secret report, which is source B denying all knowledge that they had anything to do with Kristallnacht. This was supposed to be a secret report as it says, but how was it found, this could have been done by the nazis to win back favour with the public. Source A was most probably written to what people thought of Hitler and the Nazis. At this time it was popular to criticise Hitler. Also the writer may have wanted to get the public interested in him. In Hesse report he states that what he heard was "whispered" and "Muttered" how did he understand what Goebbels said if what was said was unclear and hard to hear. ...read more.

Middle

that the night was planned because you would have needed to plan that amount of transportation of male Jews to concentration camps. Also the writer David Buffman had put spontaneous in inverted commas he said it sarcastically. I think that this means that the people also thought that it was not spontaneous but he was American and could have been biased to the Nazis Source c also suggests that Kristallnacht took place because of the murder of von Rath. "The slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public caused fury among the nazi's" I think that this means that the Nazis were behind this but the people did not like it. They thought that the people would like it. (C) Source C says that Kristallnacht was planned and not a spontaneous attack. 'No Attempts were made to put out the fires.' Writer David Buffman states. He backs this up by saying 'violence was carried out by SS men and SA storm troopers, not in uniform. Buffman also suggests that it must have been planned because of the transport needed and the taking of Jews to concentration camps. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source G is also about Kristallnacht and is implying that the Nazis were behind it as the man in uniform represents the Nazis and the dead body represents the Jews. The woman who is tied up represents the German public and is being censored because she is bound up. There are similarities and differences between the two. They are both warnings to the Germans but source f is a warning to the Nazis and source g is a warning to the German people. Source f is a warning to the Nazis because the Tsar is warning the nazis by saying that I persecuted the Jews and nothing came good of it to me so it think you shouldn't do it. Source g is a warning to the German people because the German people are being censored by the Nazis and are not allowed to do anything about Kristallnacht and the persecution of the Jews. The messages of these two cartoons are similar because they are both warning to be aware of other people source f is a warning to the nazis about the communists and source g is a warning to the German people about the nazis.` Daniel Oldland History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    The German people could not talk of this feeling because "the slightest sign of sympathy for the Jews from the public for the Jews caused fury amongst the Nazi's". He also tells us how "The most hideous part of the so-called 'spontaneous' action was the arrest and transportation to concentration camps of male German Jews".

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Source E is reliable and it blames the Nazis. Because it is reliable, it can be used to alter the accuracy of a source. Because it blames the Nazis, like Source C, it increases Source C's accuracy. Question Four Source F is a warning to the Nazis about their anti-Semitic

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    The source explains how Dr Goebbels told the party on the evening of 9 November that there had been 'anti-Jewish' demonstrations. It had apparently been decided that 'such demonstrations were not to be organised by the party, but neither were they to be discouraged if they started spontaneously'.

  2. Source Investigation: Why did Kristallnacht take place?

    The Nazi is being warned against his misconduct, and this evident recognition of Nazis' sins from the slaughter of Kristallnacht demonstrates that the sympathy of the source is with the Jews. In contrast, the sympathy of Source G is with the Germans, as is shown by the helpless woman in the picture, who represents the German people.

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    However, it doesn't mention the SA.; Source E tells us that this is the "true report" on 'Kristallnacht'. It tells us the destruction's "of Jewish businesses, houses and synagogues" and suggests that the German people have nothing to do with 'Kristallnacht' but the SS and SA which is also mentioned in source C.

  2. Why did kristallnacht take place?

    them with weaponry also that a list of Jewish names and addresses were provided. Also source C was signed "a civil servant" so it is anonymous so that the truth cannot come back to him, and he could stay safe.

  1. Sources A and B. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht ...

    However, this is quite unlikely as it is a historian who produced this summary and would have no reason what so ever to change the reasoning behind the account. Hence, the only question is the reliability of Hesses's original account.

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    The Source depicts images of violence and ruins; it states that the locals wore horrified by the Nazi's acts meaning that the things that happened even horrified the German people, "...all of the local crowds were obviously horrified by the Nazi's acts" which emphasised the inhumanness of the Nazi's, who should have been accustomed to such atrocities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work