• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

League of Nations

Extracts from this document...


League of Nations The League of Nations was organized after World War 1. The goal of the League of Nations was to prevent war and resolve conflict by discussing issues in a peaceful manner. The creation of the League of Nations was one of Wilson's most important goal and there was considerable support for such an organization because of World War I. International relations were considered to be a necessity to avoid total destruction in the future. Even though the League of Nations started international co-operation and collective security, chances of success were low because some major powers did not become members (including the US). The League of Nations was strongly weakened by the absence of Germany, the USSR and the United States of America. The League was seen as a winners' club and created tension, which was what the League was created to prevent. The absence of Germany from the League meant that one of the powers most likely to cause future conflict was outside of a framework for peaceful reconciliation. ...read more.


By agreeing to article X, each nation was being forced to defend the other nations from aggression no matter what the costs where and had to do so even if they had no interest in it for themselves. The major problems of collective security where that it obliged nations to give up their freedom of action and also nations might be forced to go to war against other nations with whom they might have a good relationship with, profit from their trade or then nations which could be much stronger than themselves and cause a lot of damage. Collective security was too idealistic it assumed that the force of the world's opinion and the threat of world action would deter aggression. One of the successes the League experienced in was the Aaland islands, these islands were near Finland and Sweden, and both of them want the islands. Neither of them could come up with a decision and they asked the League to adjudicate, their decision was that the League should remain in Finland but no weapons should be kept there. Both countries accepted the decision. ...read more.


The two countries continued to argue over the issue. The League was asked for help to deal with the Vilna situation. The Poles had took over Vilna and the Lithuania could hot persuade the Poles to leave. In the end, Vilna stayed in Polish hands until World War Two. In 1920, the Poles invaded land held by the Russians. The took over nearly 80,000 square kilometers, the League did nothing, because Russia was a communist country. When the Germans failed to pay the reparations, the French and the Belgium's invaded the Ruhr. France was seen as a senior League member, and for the League to do something, it will need a unanimous vote, however France was the one to do it and Britain was a major supporter of her. Despite the amount of failures, the League of Nations did have some success, even though it was overshadowed by the failures. The failures might be because of the indifference of the great powers, which preferred to see their country as the most important matter. However, the successful actions brought a return of peace, which was what the League of Nations was set up to achieve. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Was the League of Nations too idealistic for it's own good

    The League was based around Woodrow Wilson's of America 14 points; however America was not even in the League. So it was based around a countries ideas that weren't even there to guide them. They thought that they could run the League the way Woodrow wanted to without his guidance to help them.

  2. Account for the successes and failures of the League of Nations.

    In October of 1932 the Lytton Commission recommended that the Japanese should leave Manchuria and it should continue as a semi-independent country instead of returning to China. The League approved the Commissions recommendation, but by 1933 Japan left the League and went on to occupy the Chinese province of Jehol.

  1. The failures of Gallipoli

    Turkish forts covered the coast and mines left no spaces for battle ships to move in, as they found out when many of them sunk due to mines. They could not simply send in a few battleships and expect them to blow up the hundreds of forts along the coast.


    By forcing Naxos back into the league, Athens took away its sense of self-government and tributes to the treasury had to continue on a compulsory basis. The revolt of Naxos in 469 BC proved to be a test case for Athens, showing the extent of her power and the extreme

  1. The League of Nations

    and their League could not make powerful countries obey their rulings. The League also failed because there was a lack of unity between Britain and France. They often disagreed and they did not trust each other. With this and the fact decisions had to be unanimous made it almost impossible for the League to make a decision.

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Yet, at the time the Pact was seen as a turning point in history. Conclusion: By 1930, we can tell how successful the League was. It only did well when there involved smaller nations. When it had troubles with larger states, it had trouble because of France?s and Britain?s lack of commitment to sending in troops.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work