• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Lenin has commonly been linked with the 1917 revolutions as a relatively involved character who changed the course of Russian political history. However, he seems to be comparatively less influential in the February revolution due to his absence in Russia. At the time, his methods of propaganda and theories were more effective than his opposition as he realises the flaws of the Provisional Government and the suffering caused by WWI. The October revolution, on the other hand, is considered a far more significant revolution on Lenin?s part. Lenin was the sole individual who inspired the Bolshevik Party to revolt against the Provisional Government. Lenin was not physically involved in the February Revolution because he was in Zurich, yet one can still argue that he was indirectly influential to a certain extent. It is disclosed that he was an outstanding orator, leader, and theorist for the Bolshevik Party. According to Robert Service?s biography of Lenin, ?His (Lenin) language was unmistakably insurrectionary?, thus this explains why he was an asset to the Party. His charismatic characteristics as a leader allowed him to be the Head of Propaganda amongst the Bolsheviks. In 1900, he founded the Iskra, an underground newspaper published in Germany, to organise a Russian Marxist Party. ...read more.


Additionally, some Mensheviks such as Leon Trotsky ?joined the Bolsheviks?. This is important due to the fact that without such influential members, the main strategies for the revolution would have never come into play. Through this, Lenin was successful in gathering support of the workers, soldiers and peasants. Furthermore, the main slogan demonstrates the way in which the Bolsheviks were able to combine the demands of all their followers to maximise their appeal. Thus, Lenin is significant to the October Revolution, as he primarily convinced all the others into making the strike possible. The reason why Lenin was capable of persuading these figures was because ?it is impossible to end the war by a truly democratic peace?; therefore, in order to give the people what they desired was to carry out a revolution. Overall, we can acknowledge Lenin?s importance in the October Revolution as he was responsible for the Theses, the founding principles of the revolution. His capability of gaining attention for the party should also be credited because without the support, the revolution would have never taken place. For instance, the amount of support they had in the February Revolution was 24,000 Bolsheviks, Lenin raised this figure to 400,000 by October. ...read more.


This shows that the failures of the Provisional Government giving people paraphernalia to protest about could have been the main factor behind the cause of the October Revolution, which only leaves Lenin insignificant. In general, Lenin has arguably been involved in both revolutions to a certain extent. The propaganda and theories behind the Bolshevik Party leading up to the February Revolution were all works of Lenin. However, some say that Lenin wasn?t really remarkable in the way that he wasn?t physically involved. Also, the diminishing popularity of the Provisional Government, the Tsar?s personality and the effects of WWI had helped him a lot. This is also the case in the October Revolution. His promotion of the April Theses and dedication to the Bolsheviks helped lead to a successful revolution but one must also consider Trotsky?s physical contributions and the failure of the Provisional Government as other factors leading to the Bolsheviks? success. Many will ponder how much influence Lenin had in the Russian revolutions, one thing is clear. He will be marked down as one of the few that changed the course of Russian history. 1 Lenin?s Revolution ? David R. Marples 2 April These ? Vladimir Lenin 3 Russia ? Robert Service (1997 Penguin) 4 The Russian Revolution ? Richard Pipes 5 Reaction & Revolutions: Russia 1881 ? 1924 ? Michael Lynch 6 Theorist Source: Chris Corin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    control over want was happening in his country and he had left it so late there was nothing he could do to stop it. e) Study the following interpretations of the February Revolution: i) Nicholas was responsible for letting the situation in Petrograd get out of control in February 1917 ii)

  2. Why was Lenin important in bringing about the October revolution?

    When Lenin returned to Russia on 3rd April 1917, he announced his ideas (his April Theses). In the short document, there were then points being made. 1. The war being fought is an imperialist war and a peaceful, democratic ending to the war will only be possible if capital is overthrown.

  1. How Significant Was Leon Trotsky's Role In the October/November Russian Revolution In 1917

    spelled out his platform to the masses to which his ideas appealed. "Trotsky possessed a remarkable prose style...magnificent word play, scathing sarcasm, and brilliant character sketches are the hallmark of his writing and speech."6 Trotsky when he arrived in Russia from his asylum in the United States was still technically

  2. What problems did Lenin face when he became leader of Russia, after the Bolshevik ...

    In conclusion, Lenin faced many problems. There were food shortages, which had a great impact on Russia, as many people had next to no food to eat. At the time there was also a lot of strikes going on.

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    They fought battle after battle with poor equipment and supplies, but to no avail. This was not helped by the Tsar himself appointing himself as Commander-in-chief of the Russian army, in 1915. This was a disastrous move, as all defeats in the war were now blamed directly onto the Tsar.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    The 1905 revolution was infact the first of two revolutions were other parties tried to take Russia from under Tsar Nicholas rule. But it failed because Tsar Nicholas still had the support of his army, which helped protect him. But now Tsar Nicholas released that for him to survive as

  1. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    There appear to be substantial improvements in the Russian economy after 1905, and Stolypin's 'carrot-and-stick' method and land reforms appear to have led to a better harvest and "could have prevented the peasantry from becoming involved in revolutionary activity," as stated by Phillips.

  2. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Sources A&B claim that only the Tsar, Dr Botkin (the family doctor), two servants and the Empress's maid were shot in Ipatiev house, and source B goes onto say that the Tsarina and her children were led taken out of the city to a safe place by means of a sealed train.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work