• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Lenin has commonly been linked with the 1917 revolutions as a relatively involved character who changed the course of Russian political history. However, he seems to be comparatively less influential in the February revolution due to his absence in Russia. At the time, his methods of propaganda and theories were more effective than his opposition as he realises the flaws of the Provisional Government and the suffering caused by WWI. The October revolution, on the other hand, is considered a far more significant revolution on Lenin?s part. Lenin was the sole individual who inspired the Bolshevik Party to revolt against the Provisional Government. Lenin was not physically involved in the February Revolution because he was in Zurich, yet one can still argue that he was indirectly influential to a certain extent. It is disclosed that he was an outstanding orator, leader, and theorist for the Bolshevik Party. According to Robert Service?s biography of Lenin, ?His (Lenin) language was unmistakably insurrectionary?, thus this explains why he was an asset to the Party. His charismatic characteristics as a leader allowed him to be the Head of Propaganda amongst the Bolsheviks. In 1900, he founded the Iskra, an underground newspaper published in Germany, to organise a Russian Marxist Party. ...read more.


Additionally, some Mensheviks such as Leon Trotsky ?joined the Bolsheviks?. This is important due to the fact that without such influential members, the main strategies for the revolution would have never come into play. Through this, Lenin was successful in gathering support of the workers, soldiers and peasants. Furthermore, the main slogan demonstrates the way in which the Bolsheviks were able to combine the demands of all their followers to maximise their appeal. Thus, Lenin is significant to the October Revolution, as he primarily convinced all the others into making the strike possible. The reason why Lenin was capable of persuading these figures was because ?it is impossible to end the war by a truly democratic peace?; therefore, in order to give the people what they desired was to carry out a revolution. Overall, we can acknowledge Lenin?s importance in the October Revolution as he was responsible for the Theses, the founding principles of the revolution. His capability of gaining attention for the party should also be credited because without the support, the revolution would have never taken place. For instance, the amount of support they had in the February Revolution was 24,000 Bolsheviks, Lenin raised this figure to 400,000 by October. ...read more.


This shows that the failures of the Provisional Government giving people paraphernalia to protest about could have been the main factor behind the cause of the October Revolution, which only leaves Lenin insignificant. In general, Lenin has arguably been involved in both revolutions to a certain extent. The propaganda and theories behind the Bolshevik Party leading up to the February Revolution were all works of Lenin. However, some say that Lenin wasn?t really remarkable in the way that he wasn?t physically involved. Also, the diminishing popularity of the Provisional Government, the Tsar?s personality and the effects of WWI had helped him a lot. This is also the case in the October Revolution. His promotion of the April Theses and dedication to the Bolsheviks helped lead to a successful revolution but one must also consider Trotsky?s physical contributions and the failure of the Provisional Government as other factors leading to the Bolsheviks? success. Many will ponder how much influence Lenin had in the Russian revolutions, one thing is clear. He will be marked down as one of the few that changed the course of Russian history. 1 Lenin?s Revolution ? David R. Marples 2 April These ? Vladimir Lenin 3 Russia ? Robert Service (1997 Penguin) 4 The Russian Revolution ? Richard Pipes 5 Reaction & Revolutions: Russia 1881 ? 1924 ? Michael Lynch 6 Theorist Source: Chris Corin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    believed that he was the only one in Russia who would be able to save the Russian economy and help make Russia both an economic and a military powerhouse, Stalin seemed to be a very unintelligent man who didn't speak Russian well at all, he believed that Netherlands and Holland

  2. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    to a situation similar or perhaps even worse than before the revolution. No progress was observed economically, politically or socially as the people had hoped. The people remained unhappy with their lives, the government and the fact that the war is still on.

  1. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    Russia.'12 Through his April Theses he constructed the 'blueprint for revolution'13 and persuaded his contemporaries his doctrine would be victorious. 'One man had totally changed his party's perspective: 'victory' now meant the victory of a specific group, the Bolsheviks, who would realize the revolution.'14 Lenin's close incorporation of Marxist manifestations into the management of the Bolsheviks was significant.

  2. Why did the revolutions of 1848-49 fail to remove foreign influence from Italy?

    It was because of the fear that the revolutions would in fact be successful that France was called into action at all. After the pope was forced to flee Rome due to rioting in November 1848, Napoleon III recently elected to power in France intervened in the revolutions.

  1. The Russian Revolutions – 1917.

    Also, the Tsar wasn't a very good commander and still went to war, and left Rasputin (an unpopular peasant with a bad reputation) and Alexandra in charge of Russia. Rasputin's reputation of being a womanising drunkard damaged the reputation of the Tsarina, he gave bad advice and soon became hated.

  2. What problems did Lenin face when he became leader of Russia, after the Bolshevik ...

    The peasants were very fed up with their government, as the government seemed to ignore them. The government felt that peasants were only really important for farming and producing goods. The peasants wanted 'Peace, bread, Land'. The government did not seem to provide them with food or land, or peace for that matter.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Sources A&B claim that only the Tsar, Dr Botkin (the family doctor), two servants and the Empress's maid were shot in Ipatiev house, and source B goes onto say that the Tsarina and her children were led taken out of the city to a safe place by means of a sealed train.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    This propaganda is to show that Tsar Nicholas is still head of Russia. But infact the Tsar was losing support of his working class, which where joining other Parties such Socialist Revolutionaries of whom were trying to upraise violence between the peasants and the Tsar.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work