• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Lenin has commonly been linked with the 1917 revolutions as a relatively involved character who changed the course of Russian political history. However, he seems to be comparatively less influential in the February revolution due to his absence in Russia. At the time, his methods of propaganda and theories were more effective than his opposition as he realises the flaws of the Provisional Government and the suffering caused by WWI. The October revolution, on the other hand, is considered a far more significant revolution on Lenin?s part. Lenin was the sole individual who inspired the Bolshevik Party to revolt against the Provisional Government. Lenin was not physically involved in the February Revolution because he was in Zurich, yet one can still argue that he was indirectly influential to a certain extent. It is disclosed that he was an outstanding orator, leader, and theorist for the Bolshevik Party. According to Robert Service?s biography of Lenin, ?His (Lenin) language was unmistakably insurrectionary?, thus this explains why he was an asset to the Party. His charismatic characteristics as a leader allowed him to be the Head of Propaganda amongst the Bolsheviks. In 1900, he founded the Iskra, an underground newspaper published in Germany, to organise a Russian Marxist Party. ...read more.

Middle

Additionally, some Mensheviks such as Leon Trotsky ?joined the Bolsheviks?. This is important due to the fact that without such influential members, the main strategies for the revolution would have never come into play. Through this, Lenin was successful in gathering support of the workers, soldiers and peasants. Furthermore, the main slogan demonstrates the way in which the Bolsheviks were able to combine the demands of all their followers to maximise their appeal. Thus, Lenin is significant to the October Revolution, as he primarily convinced all the others into making the strike possible. The reason why Lenin was capable of persuading these figures was because ?it is impossible to end the war by a truly democratic peace?; therefore, in order to give the people what they desired was to carry out a revolution. Overall, we can acknowledge Lenin?s importance in the October Revolution as he was responsible for the Theses, the founding principles of the revolution. His capability of gaining attention for the party should also be credited because without the support, the revolution would have never taken place. For instance, the amount of support they had in the February Revolution was 24,000 Bolsheviks, Lenin raised this figure to 400,000 by October. ...read more.

Conclusion

This shows that the failures of the Provisional Government giving people paraphernalia to protest about could have been the main factor behind the cause of the October Revolution, which only leaves Lenin insignificant. In general, Lenin has arguably been involved in both revolutions to a certain extent. The propaganda and theories behind the Bolshevik Party leading up to the February Revolution were all works of Lenin. However, some say that Lenin wasn?t really remarkable in the way that he wasn?t physically involved. Also, the diminishing popularity of the Provisional Government, the Tsar?s personality and the effects of WWI had helped him a lot. This is also the case in the October Revolution. His promotion of the April Theses and dedication to the Bolsheviks helped lead to a successful revolution but one must also consider Trotsky?s physical contributions and the failure of the Provisional Government as other factors leading to the Bolsheviks? success. Many will ponder how much influence Lenin had in the Russian revolutions, one thing is clear. He will be marked down as one of the few that changed the course of Russian history. 1 Lenin?s Revolution ? David R. Marples 2 April These ? Vladimir Lenin 3 Russia ? Robert Service (1997 Penguin) 4 The Russian Revolution ? Richard Pipes 5 Reaction & Revolutions: Russia 1881 ? 1924 ? Michael Lynch 6 Theorist Source: Chris Corin ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    In his response Nicholas tells us how he decided to ignore the information given to him by Rodzianko. Which, I think if he had taken notice of he still could have saved his position. So this again backs up the claim that Nicholas could do nothing to control the workers, as he didn't believe what was taking place.

  2. Account for the success of the Bolshevik revolution in

    'The specific feature of the present situation is Russia is that it represent a transition from the first stage of the revolution...the power in the hands of the bourgeoisie, to the second stage, which must place the powers in the hands of the proletariat and the poorest strata of the

  1. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    This however was merely the articulation and aggregating of the new system, and had little effect on the mass population. In the long-term however, it states roughly the basic values, which have been evident in French society since 1789 to the present day, and in this way can be viewed as an event of significance.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    would have been discontented by posters such as source G, which they would believe to be true. People were used to doing what the Tsar said, through bad times and good. They never saw the possibility that there was another way.

  1. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    Their military consisted of the Red Army, which was controlled by Trotsky, and was made up of 20,000 men. The Red Army seized the main points in Petrograd including the government buildings, the central railway station, the central post office and the central bank.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    This propaganda is to show that Tsar Nicholas is still head of Russia. But infact the Tsar was losing support of his working class, which where joining other Parties such Socialist Revolutionaries of whom were trying to upraise violence between the peasants and the Tsar.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Sources A&B claim that only the Tsar, Dr Botkin (the family doctor), two servants and the Empress's maid were shot in Ipatiev house, and source B goes onto say that the Tsarina and her children were led taken out of the city to a safe place by means of a sealed train.

  2. How Significant Was Leon Trotsky's Role In the October/November Russian Revolution In 1917

    For years the masses were pushed to the brink of collapse leaving the door wide open for a party of well skilled revolutionaries to harness the failures of the government and force them out of power. 2. Trotsky's Actions That Lead to Revolution From May To October Each day for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work