• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Lions led by donkeys". How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British Soldiers and Generals on the Western Front 1914-1918.

Extracts from this document...


History Assignment - "Lions led by donkeys". How valid is this interpretation of the conduct of British Soldiers and Generals on the Western Front 1914-1918 The First World War took place between 1914 and 1918. It was the first all-European conflict for a hundred years. Two extremely powerful states hurled against each other everything military science at the time could devise. It was the cause of millions of deaths and was the most devastating event that had ever occurred. Much of the First World War was fought at a stalemate where both forces fought in trenches. One of the main places for trench warfare was on the Western Front where the states fought in miles of trenches, separated by a few miles of "no man's land". This was the stage for the mass butchery of millions of British Soldiers. The phrase "Lions led by donkey's" is the common term used to describe the conduct of the British Soldiers and Generals on the Western Front 1914-1918. The phrase means that incompetent, inadequate generals led brave British soldiers. In this essay I will be analysing and studying sources of past and present to conclude whether or not this is a valid interpretation. ...read more.


This source should be reliable as its purpose is to inform, therefore there should be no point in lying or exaggerating. Also the source is "Official figures" so should be reliable. Although the "missing" list is not included in the figures it should not alter the trend of there being far greater amounts of deaths in the Western Fronts than anywhere else. Therefore I think this source clearly shows that too many lives were lost, thus supporting "Lions led by donkeys". The way that troops were sent to fight in impossible conditions and how generals used wrong tactics are other factors that supports the idea of "Lions led by donkeys". Source A5 (ii), a description of a battle by Captain A. O. Pollard, describes the atrocious conditions the troops were sent to fight in and unsuccessful tactics employed. Evidence of poor tactics can be seen when it describes, after "weeks on end" of artillery bombarding the enemy's barbed wire, "Usually we ran up against large patches of uncut wire". This clearly supports the idea that the generals were donkeys and that their tactics did not work. One of the main tactics exercised by the British was to use heavy artillery to destroy the barbered wire, however, as the source shows this was usually unsuccessful. ...read more.


This is a clear contrast to Haig's words, therefore decreasing the reliability. Another indication that sources from Haig are unreliable is that there is some evidence that his diary entries were edited after they were written. Although in many people's eyes Haig has been seen as a murderer, "The biggest murderer of the lot was Haig", he led the British army to the "greatest series of victories in the British Army's whole history" between August and November 1918. This extract written by Peter Simkins shows how the generals were actually extremely successful. I think this idea of great success is reliable as the purpose of the source is just to inform. Also Simkins is the Senior Historian at the Imperial War Museum therefore his work should be researched and well informed, therefore meaning there must be truth in it. Also it is true that this period between August and November 1918 did exist, as it is still known today as "Hundred Days". In conclusion I feel that the interpretation "Lions led by donkeys" does have a lot of truth in it. Many sources prove that generals did lived many miles away, too many lives were lost, bad tactics were used and there were impossible conditions. However, it should not be forgotten that Britain did win and this stalemate warfare could only be won with heavy losses. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    attacks were badly planned by General Haig, allowing the Germans to kill so many people and gain the advantage over Haig's army. On the other hand, this source could be against the view that lions were led by donkeys because it says that the Germans had 'perfectly timed their response'.

  2. Poems and stories; official accounts Which of these give a more accurate picture of ...

    This is proved by the language used, such as 'Murdered most meanly, Poisoned!', which brings the poem to a very traumatic end and reflects the experiences in which the soldiers would have felt who were victims of the gas attacks in Ypres.

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    Another one of Field Marshal Haig's flaws was the tactics that he used in beating the Germans. He had believed all along that his "master plan" would pull through. His faith in his tactics blinded him to the fact that the army was becoming predictable to the Germans and they were slaughtering the armed forces.

  2. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    The British people believed that America should have joined the war long ago because they spoke the British language and they shared many other things in common. The American, however, thought differently. They believed that the war was merely a distant European quarrel that they had not helped to make and which ad nothing to do with them.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the western front in the years 1915-1917.

    Trench foot was a condition that made the soldiers feet rot if they have been in water for too long. It could also eventually lead to amputation. The soldiers were given whale oil to rub on their feet to prevent 'trench foot' from occurring.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    Also, in the period between the end of the war and 2003, interpretations of what happened in the Battle of the Somme significantly changed and Laffin seems to ignore them all and use the negative viewpoints of the soldiers. The source is also limited because the source, an extract from

  1. The Battle of the Somme: Were Lions led by Donkeys?

    The knowledgeable allies had made concrete dugouts, which were several metres deep and supplied them with the space for beds and a comfortable, safe living environment for those inside. General Haig was blamed by several people for the thousands of casualties suffered by the BEF because he seemed to think

  2. "The British Army were Lions led by Donkeys." Discuss.

    Besides, the British Generals like Haig prepared ammunition to prepare for the battle and a detailed report was written. This suggests that he actually prepared about how to fight and when to ambush, meaning they were not donkeys. On the other hand, he wasted a lot of bombs by throwing

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work