• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Madness in Russian Literature

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

St. Petersburg Pushkin to Putin Dr. Andrew Sloin 24 February 2009 Essay: Madness in St. Petersburg Within Russian literature the theme of madness is central to many famous pieces. Works by Fyodor Dostoevsky, Nikolai Gogol and Aleksandr Pushkin all discuss the issue of madness. This theme of madness stems from the large separation between the classes in St. Petersburg. All of the main characters in these stories hold positions that are the lowest possible within the social order of Russia. Their madness stems from a lack of freedom. The root cause of the epidemic of insanity is lack of freedom among the peasant class. One of Pushkin's most famous works, "The Bronze Horseman", tells a story of Eugene, a civil servant from the poor city of Kolomna. As a civil servant Eugene goes unnoticed. This demonstrates the unimportance of his position is within society. Eugene is engaged, but has no prospects of becoming a person of any importance. He envies the "men of leisure" who are "endowed with luck ... not with brains" (135). His discouraging situation gets worse after a storm ravages the city of St. Petersburg. As a result, Eugene looses his house and his fianc´┐Ż, but most importantly he looses his mind. ...read more.

Middle

Pirogov is at first furious and determined to seek revenge, but calms down by eating puff pastries, reading a newspaper and spending an evening dancing. This story presents two characters who differ in one important aspect; they are from two very different social standings. The outcome of their situations is a result of the social framework that they exist in. Lieutenant Pirogov was a man respected in St. Petersburg society. He had choices and a sense of freedom and when he was beaten up and lost the woman he was in pursuit of he was able to move one because he did not have as much vested in the relationship. He knew that he had a future and that he would find another woman. Piskarev the painter wasan outcast, "(he) belonged to a class which represents quite a strange phenomenon... (he) belonged as much to the citizens of Petersburg as a person who comes in a dream belongs to the real world" (252). He may have been unusual but it was not his strangeness that resulted in madness, it was the social position he could not escape from. Because he was so low within the socioeconomic framework of St. ...read more.

Conclusion

After looking at each situation, it is necessary to redefine what madness is within the context of these stories. None of these characters actually lost their mind because they were mental, they were slowly broken down by St. Petersburg's social structure. All of the characters were not mad because they were all right, in a way they were very much in touch with reality. They did not deny their position, they saw that the circumstances were not fair; they simply could not do anything to change them. Instead of denying their status, they accepted their fate and realized there was no reason why they should remain helpless. For these reasons these characters should not be labeled as mad. Rather their behavior was mad relative to those outsiders who did not understand the flaw in the social structure. In all three works the theme of madness is fundamental. However, madness is not individual but rather a social phenomenon, which results from the separation between the classes in St. Petersburg. The three authors point out how St. Petersburgwithholds freedom, leaving each character unable to escape their position in society. It is only when all hope is gone that madness takes over. These stories foreshadow the restructuring of the social framework that would take over in the form of communism. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Man or Monster

    Bukharin's main concern here is to reveal Stalin as an evil man, and therefore this source is biased. Sources E and F both give a strong view on Stalin's character. However, there is a huge contrast between them. In source E the impression of Stalin that the writer gives is

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Astonished and horrified by the "lack of concern" portrayed towards his fellow "comrade" where the other men where emotionless and with "no interest" that he had drowned, after which they ran to give water to the Maine. Stalin was left with a quandary at the fact that they seemed to have "more concern for animals than for men".

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    Many falsifications have been written about this event, which has been virtually turned into a myth. The purpose, as ever, is to discredit Lenin and Trotsky and show that Bolshevism and Stalinism are the same. Interestingly enough, the hue and cry over Kronstadt unites the bourgeois and Social Democratic opponents of October with anarchists and ultra-lefts.

  2. Stereotypes - The Russian Character.

    The Russians are long-suffering but not exactly placid. They have a saying: "It takes us a long time to saddle up, but once we are up, we go like stink." Russian mentality is not based on common sense. Their thinking is not orderly, logical.

  1. Stalin: Man Or Monster?

    This source tells us that Stalin attempted to propagate his vision of himself as someone caring and compassionate. He wanted to appear this way so as to secure his position and continue the 'Cult of Stalin'. Stalin was paranoid and afraid of being overthrown so he constantly attempted to convince

  2. Stalin: Man or monster?

    3) Neither of these sources is completely reliable. Source E is part of a speech written by a writer to the congress of Soviets in 1935. It was published in the communist party paper. This means that is very likely to be supporting Stalin due to the strict censoring of critical propaganda.

  1. Russia's sense of uniqueness

    more inclined to the Bols camp" * Continues to work in Tiflis and Barumb ????????????? * Gets nickname "Koba" * 1902- arrested. * 1903- Marxist split- 1) Mensheviks = minority 2) Bolshevik's = majority (ironic! Enabled radical elitists to rise to power)

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    In each Stalin is mixing with ordinary people he is trying to show how the people have worked under his regime and have achieved such amazing feats. Although B is a painting and the impressions of friendship are fake, it gives the impression that this is the way he acts amongst his people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work