• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution).

Extracts from this document...


Does a revolution necessarily lead to progress? No, a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress. I believe, though revolution may be an important scenario to progress in some cases, it is not the only scenario which should be considered, with many more other factors and scenarios possibly leading to, directly or indirectly, progress. In some cases, revolutions may lead to progress but progress can still be achieved without a revolution generally. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution). The causes of these two revolutions were caused by Russia's political, social, and economic situation. Politically, the people of Russia resented the autocracy of Czar Nicholas II. The losses that the Russians suffered during World War I also weakened Russia's view of Nicholas as he was unable to bring the country to victory. Socially, Russia was behind the rest of Europe in its industry and farming. This then resulted in few opportunities for fair advancement on the part of peasants and industrial workers. Economically, widespread inflation in Russia contributed to the revolution. ...read more.


The Mensheviks envisioned a period of capitalist development and complete political democracy as the essential prerequisite for a socialist order; in the main, they supported continuation of the war. Most of the leading Socialist Revolutionaries, a peasant party with vague socialist aspirations, also advocated continuation of the war. Under the leadership of the moderate majority, the Petrograd Soviet recognized the newly established Provisional Government as the legal authority in Russia. The Provisional Government disbanded the czarist police, repealed all limitations on freedom of opinion, press, and association, and put an end to all laws discriminating against national or religious groups. The Duma, from which it derived, could give no support, for that body was not genuinely representative of the masses. Unable to command, the government could not appeal to a war-weary, impatient people. It did not have real power and was actually like a figurehead. It had a policy of postponing for future determination by a constituent assembly the solution of such pressing problems as economic disorganization, the continued food crisis, industrial reforms, redistribution of land to peasants, and the growth of counterrevolutionary forces. The government, instead, devoted most of its energy to a continuation of the war. ...read more.


Lives were also disrupted by civil war. There were social progress, there was peace because the War with Germany was stopped but that was it. Progress on other aspects like human rights was not evident. Not all the progress the people had hoped for came true. In the Russian October Revolution, we could see progress in its economic and perhaps even in its social aspect though it was lacking on political progress. Yet, we know that revolutions need not necessarily mean that having one would lead to progress as we can see from the Russian's February Revolution. No progress was achieved, economic, politics or social, there was nothing improved even though the people had managed to end the autocracy, their country was still in the same state and remained stagnant with a temporary government which postponed solving the problems and continued the war which actually caused the country more harm than progress. Progress is obtained through many factors, and revolution is a big stepping stone which we actually can do without, though sometimes it proves to be vital. Other factors can also lead to progress, factors like having a government with a good plan for the future or a capable leader. Therefore, I conclude that a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress; it can also lead the country to nowhere. Done By: Anthea(2006) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Prices rose in the cities, as the war cause shortages of food. Lack of industrial materials cause factories to close, also causing the unemployment of workers at the same time. What was even worse for the Tsar was that the Japanese inflicted defeat after defeat on the Russians.

  2. The Causes of the October Revolution

    So along with a large number of army officers he marched on Moscow to hang all German spies and Soviets. Kerensky, in retaliation to this, armed the people of Moscow for protection. The left-wing railway workers refused to move Kournilov's train so the coup had been stopped.

  1. What were the Causes of the October Revolution in Russia, 1917?

    This meant that they struggled to take action to the problems. Also by failing to give national minorities a degree of autonomy, they lost more support from these minorities. Kerensky also contributed in a big way to the failure of the provisional government; he didn't realise the true strength of the Bolshevicks and moved against them in October.

  2. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Another thing that bothered the people of Russia is that of the uneven class divide. Many people in Russia were peasants (nearly 80%), and for them, life would be extremely difficult. They were people who were very poor and lived in small wooden huts and worked very long hours.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    However if it is genuine it could be usefull to a historian to see how the bullets have hit the wall and in what pattern, this could help him to see how the famly was organised, if they ever were there.

  2. Why was Lenin important in bringing about the October revolution?

    With "particular thoroughness, persistence and patience" this has to be explained to the masses. 2. The unfolding revolution is passing from the first stage where power was put into the hands of the bourgeoisie to the second stage where power must be placed into the hands of the proletariat and the poorest section of the peasants.

  1. What Were The Causes of The1905 Revolution & TheConsequences of The Uprising?

    The Japanese turned out to be a very efficient and intelligent fighting force, whose navy comprehensively beat and embarrassed the Russian navy. This placed the Tsar on very weak political ground as he now had egg on his face from attempting to use war as a diversion from domestic strife.

  2. Was There A German Revolution?

    The second was the "revolution from below". The military crisis (Germany suffered the loss of her main allies and the powerful force of America was entering the war on behalf of the opposition) meant that Prince Max was forced to give up after only six weeks and outside influences, especially America, were demanding unconditional surrender.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work