• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does a revolution necessarily lead to progress? No, a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress. I believe, though revolution may be an important scenario to progress in some cases, it is not the only scenario which should be considered, with many more other factors and scenarios possibly leading to, directly or indirectly, progress. In some cases, revolutions may lead to progress but progress can still be achieved without a revolution generally. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution). The causes of these two revolutions were caused by Russia's political, social, and economic situation. Politically, the people of Russia resented the autocracy of Czar Nicholas II. The losses that the Russians suffered during World War I also weakened Russia's view of Nicholas as he was unable to bring the country to victory. Socially, Russia was behind the rest of Europe in its industry and farming. This then resulted in few opportunities for fair advancement on the part of peasants and industrial workers. Economically, widespread inflation in Russia contributed to the revolution. ...read more.

Middle

The Mensheviks envisioned a period of capitalist development and complete political democracy as the essential prerequisite for a socialist order; in the main, they supported continuation of the war. Most of the leading Socialist Revolutionaries, a peasant party with vague socialist aspirations, also advocated continuation of the war. Under the leadership of the moderate majority, the Petrograd Soviet recognized the newly established Provisional Government as the legal authority in Russia. The Provisional Government disbanded the czarist police, repealed all limitations on freedom of opinion, press, and association, and put an end to all laws discriminating against national or religious groups. The Duma, from which it derived, could give no support, for that body was not genuinely representative of the masses. Unable to command, the government could not appeal to a war-weary, impatient people. It did not have real power and was actually like a figurehead. It had a policy of postponing for future determination by a constituent assembly the solution of such pressing problems as economic disorganization, the continued food crisis, industrial reforms, redistribution of land to peasants, and the growth of counterrevolutionary forces. The government, instead, devoted most of its energy to a continuation of the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lives were also disrupted by civil war. There were social progress, there was peace because the War with Germany was stopped but that was it. Progress on other aspects like human rights was not evident. Not all the progress the people had hoped for came true. In the Russian October Revolution, we could see progress in its economic and perhaps even in its social aspect though it was lacking on political progress. Yet, we know that revolutions need not necessarily mean that having one would lead to progress as we can see from the Russian's February Revolution. No progress was achieved, economic, politics or social, there was nothing improved even though the people had managed to end the autocracy, their country was still in the same state and remained stagnant with a temporary government which postponed solving the problems and continued the war which actually caused the country more harm than progress. Progress is obtained through many factors, and revolution is a big stepping stone which we actually can do without, though sometimes it proves to be vital. Other factors can also lead to progress, factors like having a government with a good plan for the future or a capable leader. Therefore, I conclude that a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress; it can also lead the country to nowhere. Done By: Anthea(2006) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the Causes of the October Revolution in Russia, 1917?

    This meant that they struggled to take action to the problems. Also by failing to give national minorities a degree of autonomy, they lost more support from these minorities. Kerensky also contributed in a big way to the failure of the provisional government; he didn't realise the true strength of the Bolshevicks and moved against them in October.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    The Tsar, at first, thought that a war was the solution to bring people of Russia together and to stop the people criticising his government. However, he had to admit that he was wrong shortly after, for the war made the conditions worse then ever before.

  1. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia?

    Any effect the workers had on the Revolution could also have been owing to their concentration. Whereas peasants and the intelligentsia were spread out over Russia, the industrial workers were predominantly based in urban areas. In a sense, this is similar to the concentration of national minorities into states within

  2. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    This view, although similar to the Revisionist view, is a lot more biased to the Bolshevik party, and depicts them almost as heroes.

  1. The Causes of the October Revolution

    So along with a large number of army officers he marched on Moscow to hang all German spies and Soviets. Kerensky, in retaliation to this, armed the people of Moscow for protection. The left-wing railway workers refused to move Kournilov's train so the coup had been stopped.

  2. Explain why the Bolsheviks were successful in October/ November 1917

    It attacked Austria in June 1917, but after initial successes the Germans moved in and the Russians were defeated; soldiers deserted the army and there was a naval mutiny, meaning the war was a disaster.

  1. How Significant Was Leon Trotsky's Role In the October/November Russian Revolution In 1917

    Deutscher describes Trotsky as a man who excelled at leading those under him but failed at leading his equals. Deutscher uses both primary and secondary evidence to build his thesis. Deutscher is a prominent English writer who grew up during the period in which the revolution took place and was born in Poland; this might slightly affect his perspective.

  2. The Russian Revolution 1917

    affairs, knew it would be a good idea to send Lenin on a sealed train to Russia. They were proved right, as Lenin later led the Bolshevik party to victory over the provisional government. They also decided to continue the war against Germany, which they were already losing, and many soldiers and sailors were mutinying.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work