• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does a revolution necessarily lead to progress? No, a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress. I believe, though revolution may be an important scenario to progress in some cases, it is not the only scenario which should be considered, with many more other factors and scenarios possibly leading to, directly or indirectly, progress. In some cases, revolutions may lead to progress but progress can still be achieved without a revolution generally. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions in Russia. One was the overthrow of the czarist regime (February Revolution) and the other the coup by which the Bolsheviks took power (October Revolution). The causes of these two revolutions were caused by Russia's political, social, and economic situation. Politically, the people of Russia resented the autocracy of Czar Nicholas II. The losses that the Russians suffered during World War I also weakened Russia's view of Nicholas as he was unable to bring the country to victory. Socially, Russia was behind the rest of Europe in its industry and farming. This then resulted in few opportunities for fair advancement on the part of peasants and industrial workers. Economically, widespread inflation in Russia contributed to the revolution. ...read more.

Middle

The Mensheviks envisioned a period of capitalist development and complete political democracy as the essential prerequisite for a socialist order; in the main, they supported continuation of the war. Most of the leading Socialist Revolutionaries, a peasant party with vague socialist aspirations, also advocated continuation of the war. Under the leadership of the moderate majority, the Petrograd Soviet recognized the newly established Provisional Government as the legal authority in Russia. The Provisional Government disbanded the czarist police, repealed all limitations on freedom of opinion, press, and association, and put an end to all laws discriminating against national or religious groups. The Duma, from which it derived, could give no support, for that body was not genuinely representative of the masses. Unable to command, the government could not appeal to a war-weary, impatient people. It did not have real power and was actually like a figurehead. It had a policy of postponing for future determination by a constituent assembly the solution of such pressing problems as economic disorganization, the continued food crisis, industrial reforms, redistribution of land to peasants, and the growth of counterrevolutionary forces. The government, instead, devoted most of its energy to a continuation of the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lives were also disrupted by civil war. There were social progress, there was peace because the War with Germany was stopped but that was it. Progress on other aspects like human rights was not evident. Not all the progress the people had hoped for came true. In the Russian October Revolution, we could see progress in its economic and perhaps even in its social aspect though it was lacking on political progress. Yet, we know that revolutions need not necessarily mean that having one would lead to progress as we can see from the Russian's February Revolution. No progress was achieved, economic, politics or social, there was nothing improved even though the people had managed to end the autocracy, their country was still in the same state and remained stagnant with a temporary government which postponed solving the problems and continued the war which actually caused the country more harm than progress. Progress is obtained through many factors, and revolution is a big stepping stone which we actually can do without, though sometimes it proves to be vital. Other factors can also lead to progress, factors like having a government with a good plan for the future or a capable leader. Therefore, I conclude that a revolution does not necessarily lead to progress; it can also lead the country to nowhere. Done By: Anthea(2006) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    For most of Nicholas' rule Russia was unstable. During his reign he had to cope with both the Russo- Japanese War and World War One. Failure in both of these was not good for his popularity, and he soon lost control of the country. So in a vain effort for popularity Nicholas created the Duma (the Russian Parliament)

  2. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Many peasants wouldn't have big farms and due to this, the whole family may not get fed, so many peasants often starved. Most peasants were illiterate. Also, no peasant had the right to vote of have any type of opinion at all.

  1. What were the Causes of the October Revolution in Russia, 1917?

    This meant that they struggled to take action to the problems. Also by failing to give national minorities a degree of autonomy, they lost more support from these minorities. Kerensky also contributed in a big way to the failure of the provisional government; he didn't realise the true strength of the Bolshevicks and moved against them in October.

  2. The Causes of the October Revolution

    So along with a large number of army officers he marched on Moscow to hang all German spies and Soviets. Kerensky, in retaliation to this, armed the people of Moscow for protection. The left-wing railway workers refused to move Kournilov's train so the coup had been stopped.

  1. What were the causes of the 1905 Revolution in Russia?

    He believed it was his duty to lead the Russian nation on his own. This led to antagonism from the intelligentsia. The liberal middle class citizens were further alienated when the Interior Minister (a Liberal himself) and his supporters were ignored by the Tsar when calling for a national Zemstro assembly.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    However, no efforts stopped the formation of groups who opposed the Tsar, such as Socialist Revolutionaries, Social Democrats and the Liberals. On top of all these chaos, Russia got involved in yet another chaos. Russia got involved in a war with Japan at 1904 over the land of Manchuria.

  1. The October Russian Revolution - A Spontaneous Popular Workers' Revolution or a Coup d'etat?

    The Government failed to deal with both of these factors. As time went on it became inevitable that these factors were going to be the main contributors to the next revolution. As November approached it was the general idea from the whole population that a revolution was wanted.

  2. Was the October revolution a popular uprising or a coup d(TM)tat?

    This view, although similar to the Revisionist view, is a lot more biased to the Bolshevik party, and depicts them almost as heroes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work