• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Military Tactics used by the USAand the Vietcong in Vietnamin the 1960's

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong in Vietnam in the 1960's During the Vietnam War there were two main sides (other countries were involved, giving financial support etc). There was the ARVN (Army of the republic of Vietnam) and the U.S. who were capitalist. Against the NVA (The North Vietnam Army) and the Vietcong (people based in South Vietnam who supported the NVA). Both sides used different military tactics during the war. At the start of the war both sides used a similar tactic: to gain the trust of the South Vietnamese people and convince them to support their own side. The Vietcong used infiltration; they spread the idea of revolution and at the same time signed up new recruits. The Vietcong were more appealing to the peasants as they spoke the same language and offered free land by doing this they gained control of the countryside in south Vietnam. The US used a similar idea called 'Pacification'. They said this was to 'win the hearts and minds' of the people of S.Vietnam. It was a policy where they provided schools and clinics and built houses, roads, canals and bridges. This was to gain their trust because they were afraid of scaring the people while they were attacking the Vietcong in the countryside. ...read more.

Middle

This was quite a problem for the US they started the policy of Attrition, where they would wear the Vietcong down. In 1964 they started selective bombing where they would bomb places like bridges, railways and supply dumps etc. this made it difficult for the enemy to fight. But this was awkward as it was difficult for the helicopters to aim. It was yet again another failure of the US; the Vietcong were succeeding in most areas of the war. In 1965 Conventional warfare began. The NVA (North Vietnamese army) became more heavily involved because they had received financial support from China so were able buy more machinery. They started fighting the US out in the open with high tech weaponry and tanks. The US realised that the war wasn't going well for them so they invented a new technique; Search and destroy missions. Because the Vietcong had succeeded in Infiltration and were now hidden amongst the South Vietnamese people it was difficult for the US soldiers to detect them. In Search and destroy missions they would hunt down and kill any Vietcong members. They would look for any signs of the Vietcong (excess food, hidden supplies and weapons or Vietcong documents). ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1968 both sides wanted the war to end as it had been going on for a long time and neither side could see the war ending. So the Vietcong took a step forward: they launched a massive surprise attack on the US. It was to be a surprise as the US had expected North Vietnam to be celebrating the annual Tet festival, but they weren't. Also the US didn't think that the Vietcong had so much equipment. They did because they had joined with the NVA to attack over 100 targets. The Vietcong had never fourth in the open before so for them it was a big strategy change. The attack was named the Tet offensive. It was not a complete success for the Vietcong as over 30,000 people died in the attack; this meant that the NVA had to take over the majority of the fighting in S. Vietnam. To the Americans it was a great shock as they thought that they were winning. As a result they increased the mount of saturation bombing and Search and Destroy missions. The NVA were not used to fighting in S. Vietnam but the Americans were experience so USA were hopeful but at the same desperate to win the war and for it al to be over. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    Source I is useful as it is from a text book and it has been made to tell people about the Ho Chi Minh trail; it would also be reliable because it was by a historian and they would have researched it.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the Vietcong and USA in Vietnam in ...

    A new tactics that the Americans used was to try and cut of the Ho Chi Minh trail as it was the method the Vietcong were using to get their supplies. It was a failure as the trail had so many different routes.

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    like heavy artillery and explosives captured from the Americans, rather than the old daggers and swords used in earlier tactics. They were also supplied weapons by China and the USSR. The guerrillas also started to use booby traps of sharpened bamboo staves, mines, grenades, and artillery shells against the US, which put the American soldiers through hell.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    This caused unrest amongst the people, who felt imprisoned. Also the Vietcong managed to get in the "safe" areas and continue their work of subversion. Consequently by 1963 the NLF controlled 40% of the countryside and terrorised the urban areas by bombing campaigns.

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    They fought a political war as well as an armed struggle and were adept at persuading the population to aid them and to give them shelter. It was almost impossible to win a war against an enemy that was 'invisible', the US troops felt bamboozled and harassed by troops they could not see.

  2. History Controlled Assesment- Success' of USA military

    Although they were incredibly brave for accepting the missions, they were not welcomed as heroes by the US public. The US public opinion was mixed at the time. People with a strong sense of Patriotism, rich people and people from a high class, supported the war, others hated and despised it.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    or the media campaigns et al. Punch, as a satire magazine may not be the most reliable or sourcing though - as a magazine dedicated to cynicism and making mockeries of political blunders, means with that purpose and the fact that evidently Punch were against the war, means the provenance of the source could be affected.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    If the VC couldn't be founded or be forced into a battle the then the villages would suffer. Chemicals were used in the jungle and on crops to kill the vegetation, so that the VC couldn't use the jungle as cover.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work