• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Military Tactics used by the USAand the Vietcong in Vietnamin the 1960's

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Military Tactics used by the USA and the Vietcong in Vietnam in the 1960's During the Vietnam War there were two main sides (other countries were involved, giving financial support etc). There was the ARVN (Army of the republic of Vietnam) and the U.S. who were capitalist. Against the NVA (The North Vietnam Army) and the Vietcong (people based in South Vietnam who supported the NVA). Both sides used different military tactics during the war. At the start of the war both sides used a similar tactic: to gain the trust of the South Vietnamese people and convince them to support their own side. The Vietcong used infiltration; they spread the idea of revolution and at the same time signed up new recruits. The Vietcong were more appealing to the peasants as they spoke the same language and offered free land by doing this they gained control of the countryside in south Vietnam. The US used a similar idea called 'Pacification'. They said this was to 'win the hearts and minds' of the people of S.Vietnam. It was a policy where they provided schools and clinics and built houses, roads, canals and bridges. This was to gain their trust because they were afraid of scaring the people while they were attacking the Vietcong in the countryside. ...read more.

Middle

This was quite a problem for the US they started the policy of Attrition, where they would wear the Vietcong down. In 1964 they started selective bombing where they would bomb places like bridges, railways and supply dumps etc. this made it difficult for the enemy to fight. But this was awkward as it was difficult for the helicopters to aim. It was yet again another failure of the US; the Vietcong were succeeding in most areas of the war. In 1965 Conventional warfare began. The NVA (North Vietnamese army) became more heavily involved because they had received financial support from China so were able buy more machinery. They started fighting the US out in the open with high tech weaponry and tanks. The US realised that the war wasn't going well for them so they invented a new technique; Search and destroy missions. Because the Vietcong had succeeded in Infiltration and were now hidden amongst the South Vietnamese people it was difficult for the US soldiers to detect them. In Search and destroy missions they would hunt down and kill any Vietcong members. They would look for any signs of the Vietcong (excess food, hidden supplies and weapons or Vietcong documents). ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1968 both sides wanted the war to end as it had been going on for a long time and neither side could see the war ending. So the Vietcong took a step forward: they launched a massive surprise attack on the US. It was to be a surprise as the US had expected North Vietnam to be celebrating the annual Tet festival, but they weren't. Also the US didn't think that the Vietcong had so much equipment. They did because they had joined with the NVA to attack over 100 targets. The Vietcong had never fourth in the open before so for them it was a big strategy change. The attack was named the Tet offensive. It was not a complete success for the Vietcong as over 30,000 people died in the attack; this meant that the NVA had to take over the majority of the fighting in S. Vietnam. To the Americans it was a great shock as they thought that they were winning. As a result they increased the mount of saturation bombing and Search and Destroy missions. The NVA were not used to fighting in S. Vietnam but the Americans were experience so USA were hopeful but at the same desperate to win the war and for it al to be over. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    Source I is useful as it is from a text book and it has been made to tell people about the Ho Chi Minh trail; it would also be reliable because it was by a historian and they would have researched it.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    in order to locate enemy defensive positions', dependant on the use of helicopters were introduced. (Summers, Vietnam Almanac) Look at p4 source booklet Pacification was the primary objective of the US war effort in Vietnam. Pacification can be defined as, 'the military, political, economic and social process of establishing or re-establishing local government.'

  1. History Controlled Assesment- Success' of USA military

    So at the start the bombing was carefully controlled- no bombing of major cities, no bombing of airfields, and certainly no bombing anywhere near the border with China. Reinforcing that; the US did not anticipate the determination and resilience of the people of North Vietnam.

  2. Describe the military tactics used by both the Vietcong and USA in Vietnam in ...

    This helped decrease the amount of bombs dropped from the air. Both sides of the War changed tactics around the late 1960s meaning that the War could go both ways at that point depending on whether the countries tactics changed for the better.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    The source itself was published in 1967, not that long into the actual fighting phase of the war, but still after key events practically highlighted the fact that the programme Johnson had promised during his presidential re-election campaign of 1964 was failing.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    The American government had to release all the information on Vietnam because of the 'freedom of information act' so we will be able to trust the information on this graph is correct.

  1. Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement ...

    They also took part in protest rallies to demonstrate their anti-war views such as the first march to Washington in December 1964, where 25,000 people took part leading to it being the largest anti-war demonstration in American history. This clearly shows that opposition to the war began to increase.

  2. What different tactics were used by both sides in an attempt to win the ...

    One USA success was the Tet Offensive. The Vietcong used conventional warfare. It was a disaster and was the closest the US ever came to victory. However it was nowhere near enough to win the war for the US. The USA campaign suffered further after the 'My Lai' massacre.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work