• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nazi Germany - Sources

Extracts from this document...


Year 11 Coursework Nazi Germany Hannah Kelly a) I think that a Historian studying Kristallnacht would find both sources useful. Source A infers that the Kristallnacht was down to Hitler and the Nazis. As Hesse worked with the Nazis, this source appears to be reliable and not biased; it was only written in 1954, after the downfall and death of Hitler. To some this may decrease the sources reliability - but not so in my opinion. Source B infers that the Nazis did not discourage Kristallnacht, however they did not order for this to happen. The source was a secret report by the Nazi Supreme and therefore, there is a strong possibility that the context will be biased. Although it was more recent to the time compared with source A. Overall, Source A is, in my opinion, more useful for the study of Kristallnacht by a historian than source B. It is simply far more reliable! b) Source C infers that Kristallnacht was planned, and acted upon by Nazis. It confirms my choosing source A over source B in the above text. ...read more.


It goes on to state that "The police supplied SA men with axes, housebreaking tools and ladders..." while source C states, "No attempts were made to put out the fires, the activity of the fire brigade...". This suggests that even people who are most portrayed as non-discriminatory, could or would not help Jewish people on or after Kristallnacht. This was a turning point. Source D also provides some evidence for this theory, as the Jewish people seemed to know this already; a lot became frightened for their safety and left. With good reason. The sources also are all very reliable in my opinion. They were written close to the discussed events; although there may be a possibility that source D is biased in favour of the Jews. Source E says as well that he/she 'feels the need to present a true report of the recent riots, plunderings and destruction of Jewish businesses. I cannot see why this person would lie, for they have little to gain no matter what religion they follow. The note was signed 'A civil Servant', as they probably doubted their safety should a Nazi find out about the note. ...read more.


It also proves that both countries (Britain and Russia) had a very good idea of the kind of things that were happening in Germany but decided not to act. e) Source I does prove that Goering was telling the truth in source H. In source I, a woman is complaining to Hitler about the destruction of her property during the events of Kristallnacht. She refers to what the Nazis did as "...destroyed everything for me like elephants in a china shop, and much worse!" In source H, Goering is very angry at this mass destruction. He sates that "it is not acceptable to me that he should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much Jewish property of economic value and by causing so much disturbance in economic life." His only concern seems to be that it is incredibly wasteful. He wants people to save items they find, such as toothpastes a well as any other useful materials. Goering is telling the truth. f) The sources do not, in my opinion, support the claim that 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' very much at all. Source A plainly states that the events that happened on 9th November 1938, were organised by Hitler and his Nazi party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Nazi Police State

    Social Democrats and Communists tried to tell the workers that they were subject to Government exploitation.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    This makes this a less likely source to use to try to see if this interpretation is best supported. Another source that is in agreement with the interpretation is Source H. When it says 'I declare that on the 27th February 1933, I and two SA men set fire to

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    similar to where C says; 'they had been provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs'. These sources agree and so this makes the other information in source C more reliable. However, we don't know who wrote source E, as it was only signed 'a civil servant'.

  2. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Also, the fact that it was written in 1954 makes it less reliable. I think this because it was written 16 years after the event and therefore ones memory may be blurred. Fritz Hesse was a journalist and he could have made some of these things up to make his

  1. Source Coursework - Nazi Germany.

    He says that, "notices reading "Jews not wanted" appeared in various shops and cinemas." He says, "Acts of terror forced Jews to sell their belongings and move away." This source does not make source C seem more accurate but it doesn't necessarily make it seem untrue either because the German

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    It could have been the government because notices "reading 'Jews not wanted' appeared in various shops and cinemas." They were probably put there by the government because the shops were various and unrelated. This source is unreliable because it was written before the event happened so it can't say who

  1. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    took place in Kristallnacht, source D states that the uproar targeting Jews was built up over a period of weeks and that notices saying "Jews not wanted" appeared on shop windows meaning that the German people caused this uproar, this contradicts the evidence collected in source C, which, according to

  2. The Final Solution Sources Coursework

    It was issued illegally which questions may introduce the element of unreliability, We are told Hans Scholl was 'aware of the atrocities carried out against both Jews and Russians' It does not say he witnessed anything personally. Tough language is used in the source to portray the opinions of the writer, for example, "abominable and inhuman crime".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work