• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nazi Germany - Sources

Extracts from this document...


Year 11 Coursework Nazi Germany Hannah Kelly a) I think that a Historian studying Kristallnacht would find both sources useful. Source A infers that the Kristallnacht was down to Hitler and the Nazis. As Hesse worked with the Nazis, this source appears to be reliable and not biased; it was only written in 1954, after the downfall and death of Hitler. To some this may decrease the sources reliability - but not so in my opinion. Source B infers that the Nazis did not discourage Kristallnacht, however they did not order for this to happen. The source was a secret report by the Nazi Supreme and therefore, there is a strong possibility that the context will be biased. Although it was more recent to the time compared with source A. Overall, Source A is, in my opinion, more useful for the study of Kristallnacht by a historian than source B. It is simply far more reliable! b) Source C infers that Kristallnacht was planned, and acted upon by Nazis. It confirms my choosing source A over source B in the above text. ...read more.


It goes on to state that "The police supplied SA men with axes, housebreaking tools and ladders..." while source C states, "No attempts were made to put out the fires, the activity of the fire brigade...". This suggests that even people who are most portrayed as non-discriminatory, could or would not help Jewish people on or after Kristallnacht. This was a turning point. Source D also provides some evidence for this theory, as the Jewish people seemed to know this already; a lot became frightened for their safety and left. With good reason. The sources also are all very reliable in my opinion. They were written close to the discussed events; although there may be a possibility that source D is biased in favour of the Jews. Source E says as well that he/she 'feels the need to present a true report of the recent riots, plunderings and destruction of Jewish businesses. I cannot see why this person would lie, for they have little to gain no matter what religion they follow. The note was signed 'A civil Servant', as they probably doubted their safety should a Nazi find out about the note. ...read more.


It also proves that both countries (Britain and Russia) had a very good idea of the kind of things that were happening in Germany but decided not to act. e) Source I does prove that Goering was telling the truth in source H. In source I, a woman is complaining to Hitler about the destruction of her property during the events of Kristallnacht. She refers to what the Nazis did as "...destroyed everything for me like elephants in a china shop, and much worse!" In source H, Goering is very angry at this mass destruction. He sates that "it is not acceptable to me that he should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much Jewish property of economic value and by causing so much disturbance in economic life." His only concern seems to be that it is incredibly wasteful. He wants people to save items they find, such as toothpastes a well as any other useful materials. Goering is telling the truth. f) The sources do not, in my opinion, support the claim that 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' very much at all. Source A plainly states that the events that happened on 9th November 1938, were organised by Hitler and his Nazi party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    to avoid all blame from the allies he was being tried by as he had nothing to lose by that point so would naturally try to put the blame onto someone else and Goering may seem like a likely choice.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    Overall, Source D and E make it more likely that Source C is accurate. Source D does hint at blaming the people but it is unreliable so one cannot use it to strengthen or weaken the accuracy of another source because that source it most likely to contain wrong information.

  1. Source Coursework - Nazi Germany.

    A list of the names and addresses of all Jewish shops and flats was provided." It also says that, "most German people have nothing to do with these riots and burnings."

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    This definitely questions the reliability, as the writer could have been biased. But in theory a civil servant should be a supporter of the Nazis- so would have to send it anonymously as they would have been in a dilemma if a Nazi had found out what was in this

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Overall, the only factors of source I that prove Goering was telling the truth in source H is that Hitler disapproved of 'Kristallnacht'. I don't think that there is enough matching evidence in the two sources to prove Goering was telling the truth in Source H.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    Question 4 Which Source do you consider least reliable? Do you agree that this means it is useless to a historian studying the German people's knowledge of the 'Final Solution'? I consider Source 9 to be the least reliable source. I view this source in the light that it is anonymous and so I believe that because there is

  1. How much can we learn about Nazi Germany by studying its architecture?

    He believed that buildings were products of historical times, and therefore demanded more funds for architecture. The aim of Nazi architecture was not only to convey the greatness and power of the German Reich to the German people, in order to help them keep faith in their own future, but

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    It also shows how Kristallnacht was an inhumane attack and the violence there was horrifying to anyone. Do sources D and E make it more, or less likely, that the account given in source C is accurate? C) Source D and E give very different accounts of the events that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work