• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Nazi Germany - Sources

Extracts from this document...


Year 11 Coursework Nazi Germany Hannah Kelly a) I think that a Historian studying Kristallnacht would find both sources useful. Source A infers that the Kristallnacht was down to Hitler and the Nazis. As Hesse worked with the Nazis, this source appears to be reliable and not biased; it was only written in 1954, after the downfall and death of Hitler. To some this may decrease the sources reliability - but not so in my opinion. Source B infers that the Nazis did not discourage Kristallnacht, however they did not order for this to happen. The source was a secret report by the Nazi Supreme and therefore, there is a strong possibility that the context will be biased. Although it was more recent to the time compared with source A. Overall, Source A is, in my opinion, more useful for the study of Kristallnacht by a historian than source B. It is simply far more reliable! b) Source C infers that Kristallnacht was planned, and acted upon by Nazis. It confirms my choosing source A over source B in the above text. ...read more.


It goes on to state that "The police supplied SA men with axes, housebreaking tools and ladders..." while source C states, "No attempts were made to put out the fires, the activity of the fire brigade...". This suggests that even people who are most portrayed as non-discriminatory, could or would not help Jewish people on or after Kristallnacht. This was a turning point. Source D also provides some evidence for this theory, as the Jewish people seemed to know this already; a lot became frightened for their safety and left. With good reason. The sources also are all very reliable in my opinion. They were written close to the discussed events; although there may be a possibility that source D is biased in favour of the Jews. Source E says as well that he/she 'feels the need to present a true report of the recent riots, plunderings and destruction of Jewish businesses. I cannot see why this person would lie, for they have little to gain no matter what religion they follow. The note was signed 'A civil Servant', as they probably doubted their safety should a Nazi find out about the note. ...read more.


It also proves that both countries (Britain and Russia) had a very good idea of the kind of things that were happening in Germany but decided not to act. e) Source I does prove that Goering was telling the truth in source H. In source I, a woman is complaining to Hitler about the destruction of her property during the events of Kristallnacht. She refers to what the Nazis did as "...destroyed everything for me like elephants in a china shop, and much worse!" In source H, Goering is very angry at this mass destruction. He sates that "it is not acceptable to me that he should upset my difficult economic tasks by destroying so much Jewish property of economic value and by causing so much disturbance in economic life." His only concern seems to be that it is incredibly wasteful. He wants people to save items they find, such as toothpastes a well as any other useful materials. Goering is telling the truth. f) The sources do not, in my opinion, support the claim that 'Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people' very much at all. Source A plainly states that the events that happened on 9th November 1938, were organised by Hitler and his Nazi party. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. What impression of 'Kristallnacht' does source c give? Explain your answer.

    Source B seems reliable - it was from a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme Court, the highest authority. It gives the true Nazi point of view, as it is secret and not meant to be read by the public.

  2. How much can we learn about Nazi Germany by studying its architecture?

    The Acropolis in Athens including buildings like the Parthenon constructed during the golden age of Athens (5th century BC) under the rule of Pericles, can be compared directly to much Nazi architecture as Hitler wanted to draw comparisons between the Nazis and these great empires.

  1. Source Coursework - Nazi Germany.

    which means that he/she is probably telling the truth because they need to remain anonymous otherwise they would be in trouble. This source backs up source C and makes it seem more accurate because it agrees with the things that source C suggests, such as, "The police supplied SA men with axes, house-breaking tools and ladders.

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    similar to where C says; 'they had been provided with hammers, axes and fire bombs'. These sources agree and so this makes the other information in source C more reliable. However, we don't know who wrote source E, as it was only signed 'a civil servant'.

  1. Nazi Germany - Why did Kristallnacht take place? Source based work.

    work more interesting to the public; he could have heard rumours and broadcasted it. Overall, I think that this doesn't support the statement because the source clearly implies that Goebbels and the SA were involved and it was planned, not a 'spontaneous event caused by the German people' Source B

  2. The Nazi Police State

    decided not to shake any hands, thus technically not refusing to shake the hands that he did not want to. It was common belief that Hitler 'refused' to shake the hand of Jesse Owens but this was never the case.

  1. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    Through analysing the sources the idea that the German people were 'willing executioners' of Jews can be found out by examining whether or not the Germans acted upon their knowledge. Source 2 shows that the Germans did take part, indirectly, in the extermination of Jews, "Germans rounded up the Jews and transported them eastwards."

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    knows about the Reichstag is I, for I set fire to it' This agrees with Source E as they both show him as 'boasting' about setting fire to it. Source H also states that Karl Ernst declared 'that on 27th February 1933 I and two SA men set fire to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work