Nazi Propaganda: How effective was it?

Authors Avatar

Edward Gooch

Nazi Propaganda: How effective was it?

In a totalitarian state such as Nazi Germany, a certain element of control was used to Nazify those Germans who were less inclined to vote for the NSDAP. Goebbels himself stated that the party “in the long run will not be content with the 52 per cent behind it and with terrorising the remaining 48 per cent, but will see its most immediate tasks as being to win over that remaining 48 per cent”.

        

        The Nazis were able to build on existing values held by the majority of disgruntled Germans. Such examples included anti-Marxism, disillusionment with the Weimar democracy which had failed them, the desire for a strong, charismatic leader who would recreate Germany back to the great nation of late, and the hatred of the Treaty of Versailles. There was a general consensus that these values were widely held amongst Germans in 1933. However the Nazi party wished to impose their own values on society, and went about this using propaganda. One of which was the Hitler Myth, created by Goebbels. The title of “Fuhrer” seemingly gave Hitler more power, and showed that he could be strong willed, resolute, radical and ruthless, and he would be able to undo the injustices of Versailles in his foreign policy. To go about their radical foreign policy, the Nazis required plenty of support, especially for the Anschluss with Austria and the fight for the Sudetenland. Many were apprehensive at the time, and there was no enthusiasm for war in 1939. However Goebbels had persuaded Germans that the war had been forced upon them. This, to a certain extent was effective, since there was evidential support for the Anschluss with Austria and takeover of Sudetenland. The Nazis ability to focus on the concern of the people at an early stage secured the party’s trust in those who were disillusioned with previous Weimar Governments.

        A problem for the Nazi Party was to unite all peoples of all social classes into one Volk in the face of their enemies. To do this, Goebbels needed to manufacture consensus. He went about this using different mediums. The mediums through which political messages were spread were varied, from architecture to literature, each of which had a certain appeal to one area of society or more.

        Of these methods used to appeal to German society, the radio was considered as a major contributor to the success of the Nazi Party. Goebbels stated “I consider radio to be the most modern and most crucial instrument that exists for influencing the masses” and described the radio as “the spiritual weapon of the totalitarian state”. The radio was used to broadcast news, speeches and various programmes, with a modern edge and artistic culture and imagination, which aimed to have underlying nationalist themes, hence Goebbels’ subtle use of propaganda.

Join now!

        As for the radios popularity, it can safely be said that it became increasingly popular between 1932 and 1939, with the amount of Germans owning radios rising from 25 per cent to 70 per cent. In the early stages of Hitler’s reign, when pre-recorded speeches were on the air, many did not listen to Hitler’s speeches, however, as he moved onto live radio broadcasts, and radio sales boomed, many more listened to his speeches, showing is effectiveness as an orator and his well accepted charismatic persona.

        His speeches were aimed at many social groups, as were the initiatives taken by ...

This is a preview of the whole essay