Notes on The Alternative Establishment

Authors Avatar

Corinne Williams

Notes on The Alternative Establishment

The male ‘alternative establishment’ were the trade Unions, religious groups and the press. These were as divided over the question of women’s suffrage as were the politicians.

  • Trade Unions

Although the leadership of the majority of trade unions seemed to be indifferent to women’s suffrage, a number of them supported it. However the trades Union movement as a whole was split over the question of votes for women. The Trades Union congress had passed a resolution in 1884 in favour of it but little had been done in practice to promote it. 17 years later, the suggestion drew an antagonistic rather than supportive response. According to Liddington and Norris, the official union reponse ranged from ‘benign indifference to downright hostility.’ But not all the trade union movement was antagonistic as of course it responded differently at individual and local levels.

  • Religious Groups

Religion played a very significant role in people’s lives in the 19th and 20th centuries. Religious groups responded to women’s suffrage in diverse ways. Some supported it, (e.g. Quakers (especially motivated by a sense of moral purpose) and nonconformists.) and some opposed it (e.g. Roman Catholics). Throughout this period the Church of England managed to keep a discreet silence, so the WSPU condemned the church for being ‘shamefully and obsequiously compliant’. However a number of individual clergy responded positively to women’s suffrage and protested when force-feeding of the suffragettes occurred. A number of clergy argued that women’s suffrage harmonised with essential Christian principles of equality, and even established a church league for women’s suffrage to promote the cause.

Join now!

  • The Press

Before the illegal activities of the WSPU provided headline-catching news, most newspapers disregarded the women’s suffrage movement. After 1905, (when Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenny were arrested) they began to take more notice as increased amounts of activity began to occur and disrupt normal living. However the press often reported militancy in ways, which were condemnatory rather than objective or complimentary. Once the militancy escalated, the press became even more hostile, describing the suffragettes as ‘mad, bad and dangerous to know.’ The times in particular were most unsympathetic as were the London Standard. However there were papers ...

This is a preview of the whole essay