Corinne Williams
Notes on The Alternative Establishment
The male ‘alternative establishment’ were the trade Unions, religious groups and the press. These were as divided over the question of women’s suffrage as were the politicians.
- Trade Unions
Although the leadership of the majority of trade unions seemed to be indifferent to women’s suffrage, a number of them supported it. However the trades Union movement as a whole was split over the question of votes for women. The Trades Union congress had passed a resolution in 1884 in favour of it but little had been done in practice to promote it. 17 years later, the suggestion drew an antagonistic rather than supportive response. According to Liddington and Norris, the official union reponse ranged from ‘benign indifference to downright hostility.’ But not all the trade union movement was antagonistic as of course it responded differently at individual and local levels.
- Religious Groups
Religion played a very significant role in people’s lives in the 19th and 20th centuries. Religious groups responded to women’s suffrage in diverse ways. Some supported it, (e.g. Quakers (especially motivated by a sense of moral purpose) and nonconformists.) and some opposed it (e.g. Roman Catholics). Throughout this period the Church of England managed to keep a discreet silence, so the WSPU condemned the church for being ‘shamefully and obsequiously compliant’. However a number of individual clergy responded positively to women’s suffrage and protested when force-feeding of the suffragettes occurred. A number of clergy argued that women’s suffrage harmonised with essential Christian principles of equality, and even established a church league for women’s suffrage to promote the cause.