• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

Objective histories.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What evidence, using 2 perspectives, is there to support the view that there can never be truly objective histories. This essay will focus on the view that there can never be truly objective histories using two perspectives from the later part of the twentieth century and will also consider various definitions on the nature of history. Subsequent to the appraisal of various theories on the nature of history, it could be argued that historians seem to be in a state of confusion about their own profession. The status of historical knowledge has been hotly contested with regards the question of whether history is a science and more recently with the nature of language and the extent of its bearing on the real world, past and present. Disagreement among historians about the nature of virtually every aspect of their work from the definition of history and primary source evaluation through to the finished work of interpretation is copious. E.H.Carr in 'What is History?' (1990, p30) defines history as 'continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the present and the past'. This is partially similar to K.Jenkins's version, in 'Re-thinking History', (1991, p70) 'History is a shifting problematic discourse, ostensibly about an aspect of the world, the past, that is produced by a group of present-minded workers...' (historians). In contrast, J.Warren, in 'History and the Historians' (1999, p109) offers a more simplistic definition, 'History is the past, and historians are those who write about history'. ...read more.

Middle

J.Tosh, in 'The pursuit of History' (2000) states, it is possible that a historian's current priority may lead her/him to highlight some aspects of the past and to exclude others. Popular historical knowledge tends to a highly selective interest in the remains of the past, is shot through with present day assumptions, and is only incidentally concerned to understand the past on its own terms. Tradition, nostalgia and the belief in progress, which make up social memory, look for a consistent window on the past and result in significantly distorting images of the past. Conversely, professional historians insist on a lengthy immersion in the primary sources, a deliberate shedding of present day assumptions and a rare degree of empathy and imagination. G.R.Elton argues that the historian's training predisposes her/him to give a privileged place to the factual or 'exact knowledge'. They look for the reality content in their documents and aim to build their arguments on empirically verifiable truths. In the same way a scientist would approach her/his task, without preconceptions and moral involvement. Therefore, the historian's first duty is to accumulate factual knowledge about the past, which will in turn determine how the past should be explained or interpreted. According to R.G.Collingwood, in 'The Idea of History' (1946), the historian's decisions 'shall follow inevitably from the evidence'. Postmodernist view the notion of the objective historian as ridiculous, because it presupposes that the truth about the past is recoverable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Rorty's use the concept of 'ironic re-description' to support the view that anything can be made to look good or bad, desirable or undesirable, useful or useless, simply by being re-described, which includes the past/history. This in turn creates a mass of genres (designer/niche histories) to be variously used and/or abused T.Zeldin, an opponent of 'scientific' theory maintains in his article, 'Ourselves as we see us' (31 December 1982, Times Literary Supplement), that all he or any historian can offer is his personal vision of the past, 'everyone has the right to find his own perspective'. J.Warren holds that objectivity is less a personal quality or attribute than an awareness of the difficulties of being objective. A historian should be aware of the dangers of overstating the possibility of objectivity, but also the dangers of denying it completely, which plays into the hands of those who have a vested interest in a denial of their own - namely, that the Holocaust actually happened. In conclusion, history does not exist in the present; it cannot be recreated, but exists largely through the writings of historians, who inevitably distort it to a greater or lesser degree. Dismissing objectivity altogether is verging on the edge of the relativism cliff. The debate over the definition of history will most definitely continue, which is a healthy sign. Nonetheless, historians satisfy the need of society for an explanation of the past, which is grounded in reality, even if it cannot claim to communicate the absolute truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent can historians be objective?

    Zinn assigns to history a social task. The choice of what to write, from the array of available material, should be made with this idea in mind. Zinn likens historical writing to mapmaking - to aim for full objectivity in historical study is analogous to attempting to compose a map which shows every single feature of a piece of terrain.

  2. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    (Huggins, R, J 1994 p.1) Following this the usage of the oral history method is permitable as she has declared that she can only say what she holds to be true, in that she is not claiming her opinion to be universal.

  1. Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

    His genius lies in the scope and manner of his unprecedented investigation and the relative importance he assigns to events and their causes - narrated rationally in human terms. His earnest and constant desire to understand 'the other' is what we post-moderns can continue to learn from Herodotus.'

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    probable that both within his upbringing and his research for this novel; his parents informed his prejudices. As a young boy, de Berniļæ½res won a scholarship from the army, which funded his school fees and he consequently spent some time as a soldier.

  1. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    No waffle needed. Also, you must referrer to the question at some point in the essay! * Back-up/Evaluation. Why did that (your point) change peoples lives? Did it lead on to something else? How effective was it? Do you have any evidence?

  2. swansea and the Blits version 2

    that they needed to build safe place to protect the public from being attacked by bombs and to move away from there home which could easily be targeted. However they were not well advanced by the time of the outbreak of the war in September 1939, and the Air Raid Precaution committee resorted to requisitioning basements as public shelters.

  1. Life In The Trenches - research and evaluation of the sources

    The British army tried to hide the terrible quality of the food, and the lack of it, from everyone on the home front. They attempted to spread the message that soldiers were given two hot meals every single day, but their lies proved pointless when soldiers went back home and reported the truth.

  2. History of Grenada (How to write a short IGCSE essay: Plan, Evaluation of Sources, ...

    Evaluation Of Sources Geographica by G. Cheers (Editor) This source is very reliable because it?s a book, the publishers are very careful that there are no mistakes. There is not a lot of information but there is a brief introduction about nearly everything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work