• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Opposition to the Nazi regime.

Extracts from this document...


History Essay. Opposition to the Nazi regime. Answering this question requires me to deal with the two sources individually, evaluating them and then bringing them together at the end. The first source is an extract from "Hitler and Nazi Germany" written in 1992, so we can assume that it is pretty much up to date and as a university lecturer we can be assured that Jackson J. Spielvogel is writing with credibility at stake, and the source can be deemed reliable. In the source we are told that the main resistance came from the political left, the communists and socialists. This is a valid assertion. The KPD and SPD were driven underground as their offices were seized in 1933, the KPD with the "law for the protection of the people and the state" following the Reichstag Fire, and the SPD a few months later, because of new legislation making other parties apart from the NSDAP illegal, and with the fist of the SA this law ensured the formation of a one party state. This sealed the end of "legitimate" resistance from the parties, though arguably they became a greater danger when they went "underground", as they didn't have to worry about legality in their actions (though still had to do things that people wanted, otherwise to the world they would just be activists). The SPD quickly established a sophisticated underground resistance to oppose Nazism, with the KPD being more successful in active resistance. ...read more.


A closer analysis of the Communist groups operating in Germany into the early 1940's reveals a similar fate as the Gestapo hunted them down or they fell victim to denunciation by their fellow citizens. The Red Orchestra, a spy organisation for the USSR during the war, for instance is an example as they were defeated by the Nazi secret police and specialist forces. There are a number of points at issue with the information contained in the source extract. In the first instance I would like to reinforce that we are informed that the university lecturer is an American writing in "Hitler and Nazi Germany, 1992" and so academically reliable as we can assume lots of historical research took place for Jackson to come to this judgement. The source should ideally be read in its original context. The book the extract comes from could be merely a general survey of key developments or a collection of related articles. The view is held in line with much certainty as revised representations by western historians some of whom accept that Communists, Socialists and workers played a more active role in resisting the regime than previously thought. The author is correct in his/her view that the left, notably the Communists and Socialists were committed to resisting the regime. It should nevertheless be pointed out that Gestapo and SD action taken successfully against resistance outweighed the gains made by the extradited parties. Acts of resistance, in a survey, show a decline as the war of attrition by the Gestapo and the SD takes its toll. ...read more.


Yet, little headway was gained, and until the tide of the war turned against Germany most accepted Hitler. So only sporadic resistance was made, achieving little. In the latter war years, it became more powerful an element within the army, and climaxed with the only attempt on Hitler's life since his coming to power (1944, the Bomb Plot). Though a purge followed this, which crumbled most of the army's resistance in to dust. So the authors are correct in their views, "within the High Command there were those who considered Hitler an upstart", this is a valid interpretation of the facts, and as the Conservative Elites had vast resources of their own and were in a position of power within the Nazi structure, they were in a powerful position to offer resistance to the Nazi regime. Yet their greatest strength was their greatest downfall, because of their wealth, status and position in society, they had far more to risk losing than the average (probably) destitute Communist resistor, and would have less means to go against Hitler, it would take more courage from them. So, balancing the two sources up, we can see that the military were more likely the stronger force, but without the help of the others this group (and vice-versa, of course) would not have been encouraged if there was not other resistance going on somewhere, as there would be the feeling of loneliness, and of too great a risk. There are some circumstances where the two types overlap "the Red Orchestra" could be affiliated with the army and the KPD for instance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. "The most important reason why there was little opposition in Germany towards the Nazi ...

    for example, Schneider was arrested in 1934 for displaying public Anti-Nazi views. He was then sent to a concentration camp in 1937, stretched on a rack, and whipped. He was then sentenced to an isolation cell, and died soon after.

  2. The Nazi Police State

    believing in God, they were simply not believing in him as much as they could, And by placing a copy of Mein Kampf in every church, Germany would be taking guidance from Hitler's words, instead of God's. This was to guarantee him the further strengthening of his avid support and gain the trust of the nation.

  1. "The most important reason why there was little opposition in Germany towards the Nazi ...

    Fifthly, there were several youth groups that opposed Hitler. These youths didn't attend the Hitler youth and were more interested in socialising and dancing to unapproved music (e.g. English, American and Jazz). These youths also found it fun to ambush the Hitler youths as neither got on with each other.

  2. How widespread and dangerous was Youth opposition in the Third Reich?

    forces and thus especially in rural areas the Hitler Youth almost disappeared and rather attended the Church, as shown in the example of the town of Schn�pflingen in rural W�rttemberg in 1944. A Hitler Youth leader in Wiblingen (also rural W�rttemberg)

  1. "The July Plot Failed Largely Because of Popular Support for Hitler." How valid is ...

    Some might jump to the conclusion that the reason for the difference between the two sources lies in the nationality of the authors. This is unlikely but can be taken into account as Dr. Hildebrand is German and Bullock is British.

  2. Why was opposition to Nazi persecution of minorities so unsuccessful in the years 1933-45?

    The girls practiced paramilitary training, went on marches and outings, but the focus of the camp was on how to raise children and become more domestic. Young women learned the basics of domestic life and child rearing skills. We can see from this that Hitler had planned well as took

  1. ­­How much support was there for the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1939?

    actually thought, but source A also has some use in seeing the way that all parts of society had to praise Hitler to keep any power. On balance, I think that source B is more useful. b) The author of this source thought that there was not really much actual support for the Nazi regime in 1936.

  2. Thr opposition of the Church.

    the Western European culture that, since the era of the Roman emperor Constantine, had been explicitly and deliberately "Christian." The Churches' advocacy of a "Christian culture" led to a "sacralization of cultural identity" (as the theologian Miroslav Volf puts it), in which dominant, positive values were seen as "Christian" ones, while developments viewed negatively (such as secularism and Marxism)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work