• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Opposition to the Nazi regime.

Extracts from this document...


History Essay. Opposition to the Nazi regime. Answering this question requires me to deal with the two sources individually, evaluating them and then bringing them together at the end. The first source is an extract from "Hitler and Nazi Germany" written in 1992, so we can assume that it is pretty much up to date and as a university lecturer we can be assured that Jackson J. Spielvogel is writing with credibility at stake, and the source can be deemed reliable. In the source we are told that the main resistance came from the political left, the communists and socialists. This is a valid assertion. The KPD and SPD were driven underground as their offices were seized in 1933, the KPD with the "law for the protection of the people and the state" following the Reichstag Fire, and the SPD a few months later, because of new legislation making other parties apart from the NSDAP illegal, and with the fist of the SA this law ensured the formation of a one party state. This sealed the end of "legitimate" resistance from the parties, though arguably they became a greater danger when they went "underground", as they didn't have to worry about legality in their actions (though still had to do things that people wanted, otherwise to the world they would just be activists). The SPD quickly established a sophisticated underground resistance to oppose Nazism, with the KPD being more successful in active resistance. ...read more.


A closer analysis of the Communist groups operating in Germany into the early 1940's reveals a similar fate as the Gestapo hunted them down or they fell victim to denunciation by their fellow citizens. The Red Orchestra, a spy organisation for the USSR during the war, for instance is an example as they were defeated by the Nazi secret police and specialist forces. There are a number of points at issue with the information contained in the source extract. In the first instance I would like to reinforce that we are informed that the university lecturer is an American writing in "Hitler and Nazi Germany, 1992" and so academically reliable as we can assume lots of historical research took place for Jackson to come to this judgement. The source should ideally be read in its original context. The book the extract comes from could be merely a general survey of key developments or a collection of related articles. The view is held in line with much certainty as revised representations by western historians some of whom accept that Communists, Socialists and workers played a more active role in resisting the regime than previously thought. The author is correct in his/her view that the left, notably the Communists and Socialists were committed to resisting the regime. It should nevertheless be pointed out that Gestapo and SD action taken successfully against resistance outweighed the gains made by the extradited parties. Acts of resistance, in a survey, show a decline as the war of attrition by the Gestapo and the SD takes its toll. ...read more.


Yet, little headway was gained, and until the tide of the war turned against Germany most accepted Hitler. So only sporadic resistance was made, achieving little. In the latter war years, it became more powerful an element within the army, and climaxed with the only attempt on Hitler's life since his coming to power (1944, the Bomb Plot). Though a purge followed this, which crumbled most of the army's resistance in to dust. So the authors are correct in their views, "within the High Command there were those who considered Hitler an upstart", this is a valid interpretation of the facts, and as the Conservative Elites had vast resources of their own and were in a position of power within the Nazi structure, they were in a powerful position to offer resistance to the Nazi regime. Yet their greatest strength was their greatest downfall, because of their wealth, status and position in society, they had far more to risk losing than the average (probably) destitute Communist resistor, and would have less means to go against Hitler, it would take more courage from them. So, balancing the two sources up, we can see that the military were more likely the stronger force, but without the help of the others this group (and vice-versa, of course) would not have been encouraged if there was not other resistance going on somewhere, as there would be the feeling of loneliness, and of too great a risk. There are some circumstances where the two types overlap "the Red Orchestra" could be affiliated with the army and the KPD for instance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Nazi Police State

    Christianity would soon fade away, and Judaism had no value to his Nazi party, so there would soon be no other religion in Germany than The National Reich Church, which he controlled. THE ECONOMY AND RE-ARMAMENT Hitler's economic policies changed dramatically from 1934 onward.

  2. "The most important reason why there was little opposition in Germany towards the Nazi ...

    In 1933, Hitler banned marriage between a gypsy and a German citizen, for fear of contaminating society. In 1938, the decree for the 'struggle against the gypsy plague' was issued, and as a result, gypsies had to be registered to ensure complete racial separation from Germans.

  1. To what extent was the severity of Nazi repression an indication of the strength ...

    This therefore highlights the fact that the Edelweiss pirates were a more effective threat and their repression was comparatively a lot more hostile. The "White Rose" are the group consisting of brother and sister Sophie and Hans Schmorrel, Christoph Probst, Willi Graf and Kurt Huber, were students at Munich University, who were primarily motivated by the lack of freedom.

  2. ­­How much support was there for the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1939?

    will soon be criticised, yet only mentions any support, or positive factor at the end. This positive factor is that many newly employed people regard the new work through rearmament as a "great feat". The question says "What did the author of this source think was the extent of support for the Nazi regime by autumn 1936?"

  1. How widespread and dangerous was Youth opposition in the Third Reich?

    1944, a real danger did not radiate from them; neither did it from others. Those groupings were usually founded to celebrate a different way of living outside the conformity of the HJ and in only few cases had real political intention.

  2. Thr opposition of the Church.

    Throughout Hitler's Germany, bishops and other Christian religious leaders deliberately avoided antagonizing Nazi officials. When Christian clergymen and Christian women deplored Nazi policies, they often felt constrained to oppose those policies in a muted fashion. Even in the Protestant Confessing Church (the Church group in Germany that was most critical

  1. Why was opposition to Nazi persecution of minorities so unsuccessful in the years 1933-45?

    Women knew not to wear cosmetics or revealing clothing because Hitler believed that a proper German woman should not flaunt her sexuality in front of a man. Hitler's policies encouraged women to lead healthy lives so that they could bear healthy, happy, and Aryan children.

  2. However, the German people who were hungry and bitter wanted new faces, they wanted ...

    This immediately throws into disarray the whole idea of a democracy, as well as according to a USPD deputy "if some henchmen of the Hohenzollerns (the royal family), a general perhaps were to be at the head of the Reich,"2 article 48 could be a weakness exploited by military men to use to their advantage as a military coup.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work