• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10

Outline and assess the contributions made by the NUWSS and the WSPU to the achievement of votes for women in 1918.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline and assess the contributions made by the NUWSS and the WSPU to the achievement of votes for women in 1918. Prior to 1860 campaigners for votes for women were few and there were no women's suffrage societies. According to Bartley (1998) the vote was seen as 'more of an obligation than a human right'. In 1832 Mary Smith presented the first women's suffrage petition to Parliament, this is seen by some Historians as one of the key moments in the beginning of the women's suffrage movement. By the middle of the 19th Century the campaign began picking up supporters and the absence of the vote began to be seen by some women as symbolic of their second-class status. By 1914 there were fifty-six women's suffrage societies with some three hundred thousand members. The vote was finally given to women age thirty and over in February 1918 and the age qualification was abolished in 1928. This essay aims to outline the actions of the two main women's suffrage societies, the WSPU and the NUWSS, and assess the value of the contributions made by each in gaining the vote in 1918. The year 1866 was a significant landmark as some of the most influential feminists of the time, including Barbara Bodichon and Emily Davies, drafted a petition signed by fifteen hundred women, demanding enfranchisement of all householders regardless of sex. ...read more.

Middle

Many Historians have criticised the structure, Bartley (1998) writes of two in particular. George Dangerfield believes that the WSPU was a dictatorial organisation, under the dual tyranny of Emmiline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel, whilst Ray Strachey said that the WSPU entrusted all decisions to the leaders whilst the members happily obeyed orders. The WSPU saw many splits, due mainly to the Pankhurst's dismissing those who sought to disagree with their control. The WSPU did not start as a militant organisation, their methods were at first peaceful. In 1905 Emmiline and Christabel Pankhurst went with Annie Kenney to hear Sir Edward Grey of the Liberal Party, who were expected to win the upcoming election, speak in Manchester. They wanted to ask him if the Liberal Party supported votes for women. Annie Kenney shouted the question from her seat during the speech, and the resulting brawl between the women and the rest of the crowd led to them being dragged out of the building, the younger two were arrested. They were given a choice in court of a fine or a jail sentence, both chose the jail sentence and the term 'votes for women' made headline news. In 1906 the Daily Mail coined the term 'suffragette' and the name stuck. ...read more.

Conclusion

I feel that the actions of the two organisations combined, (along with a number of other organisations such as the East London Federation of Suffragettes, who fought for women's rights throughout the war), were instrumental in getting the vote for women. There have bee written many different versions of the truth. There are for instance a number of different accounts of the death of Emily Davison under the hooves of the Kings' horse in 1913. Bartley (1998) argues that Emily Davison died accidentally, whilst Raeburn (1976) writes that Emily Davison had 'believed that one martyr could save the cause', and that she had tried to take her own life in 'dramatic circumstances numerous times before when suffragette affairs were critical'. She also writes that Miss Davison had 'achieved her aim when she met her death on the Epsom Racecourse' (Pg 63). From the evidence and written accounts I have come across, I come to the conclusion that the suffrage campaign fought by the WSPU and the NUWSS played a large part in winning the vote, but the massive effort of women as a whole during the war was what ultimately won them the vote. I also believe that the vote would have been given to women without the suffrage campaign, or the war effort, later perhaps than it was given, due to changes in attitudes and the evolution of the human race. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    and doing the other silly things that men have done when they wanted the laws altered'. The Suffragists used alternative tactics instead. They issued leaflets, collected petitions and held meetings. They also met with politicians and argued their case. At election times they helped any candidate who supported women's suffrage.

  2. How different were the reactions of the WSPU and the NUWSS to the coming ...

    You would not have expected the WSPU to stop campaigning throughout the war as they were the more extreme of the two groups. They became very patriotic, renaming their newspaper "Britannia". There were some members of this group who did not agree with the war.

  1. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    The findings of his first report, in 1901, had been one of the reasons for the Liberal Reforms before the First World War. The second report had shown that poverty still existed in Britain and about 10% of the population suffered real hardship.

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons given by the Suffragettes ...

    Source H, an extract from a history book called, 'Women's Suffrage in Britain 1867-1928', argues that the war effort was not the reason why women earned the vote. In fact, it states, the war only 'shows how little change resulted from the war'.

  1. How important was the First World War in achieving votes for women in 1918?

    However, almost all of the Suffragists were active in wartime relief work and this overcame some of the divisions within the NUWSS. In contrast to the WSPU, the NUWSS remained committed to women's suffrage.

  2. Describe law and order in London in the last 19th century

    Jack the Ripper was never captured. There were many suspects but no-one was charged. So the killer remains a mystery which leaves people to still talk about their theories of who they think the Ripper was. History Coursework: Jack The Ripper Question Three: "Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?"

  1. womens crsk history

    Did the women keep their jobs after the war, or did they leave and carry on as normal. In conclusion, I think that Sources F and G are not that useful to us now because Source F is just a propaganda poster, you do not know how many women actually applied for the job.

  2. How was British society changed 1906 - 1918

    Political Personalities The Liberal Government also included a number of great personalities. Their willpower and plans for the future of Britain were enough to carry out many reforms. Although many of the times they faced strong opponents. There were two main people who stood out because of their beliefs which lead to many reforms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work