• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Personal Log : The Cuban Missile Crisis

Extracts from this document...


The Log I chose the subject of the Cuban Missile Crisis because I have always been interested in the Cold War and especially the relationship between President Kennedy and Premier Khrushchev. The missile crisis seemed to be the perfect topic as I already had several books on Kennedy, which contained information on the crisis. My original question was "Who played the most important role in bringing about a peaceful conclusion to the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy or Premier Khrushchev." Therefore my early reading centred on this question. The sources I studied were all secondary, either books or videos. I wanted to produce a highly analytical study and started by making detailed notes on three relatively new books. I purchased One Hell of a Gamble by Fursenko and Naftali, A Question of Character by Thomas Reeves and The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour Hersh. I started my research by reading One Hell of a Gamble. After making substantial notes I found that this book contained more factual than analytical information and was disappointed by its content. I then read large sections of the biographies, The Dark Side of Camelot and A Question of Character. The three books I had read all contained useful information on the build-up to the crisis and the events of the crisis itself. However, all three books took different viewpoints on who played the most crucial role in bringing about a peaceful conclusion to the Cuban Missile Crisis. ...read more.


The book proved very useful when writing my first chapter entitled "Kennedy the Hero." Although many of the opinions held by American journalists seem slightly exaggerated the book nevertheless contained a body of useful information and opinion, which I could easily use when writing up my study. The Kennedy Crises along with A Question of Character and The Dark Side of Camelot proved the most useful books when it came to "putting pen to paper", simply because they contain a vast amount of pertinent information and opinion. After thoroughly reading and making notes on the four aforementioned sources, I read sections of two other books The Kennedy Clan by J.Davis and Kennedy by Ted Sorensen one of President Kennedy's speechwriters. Although these books do not contain huge amounts of opinion concerning the Cuban Missile Crisis, they were still useful. Kennedy gives a very overstated view of President Kennedy's handling of the crisis and Sorensen firmly believes that the President was a hero, who was instrumental in the ending of the crisis. It is easy to understand why Sorensen puts across this view as he was so closely linked to the President. However, one could say that Sorensen was next to Kennedy at every point during the crisis, and therefore would be a good judge of how the President handled the situation and whether he played the most crucial role in bringing about a peaceful conclusion to the Cuban Missile Crisis. I used The Kennedy Clan very little. ...read more.


I found the writing of my conclusion relatively easy. The book I agreed with most was A Question of Character by Thomas Reeves. I felt he gave the most balanced and convincing view much of which came through in my conclusion. The other books I studied gave well argued views, but I simply felt that they were exaggerated in some cases. After finishing my study I was able to listen to the Kennedy tapes, which are recorded extracts of President Kennedy in meetings with EX-COMM. After extensive listening I felt that the tapes reinforced my view that it was the President who played the most crucial role in the handling and eventual ending of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Kennedy seems calm and in control of the situation throughout the meetings, and is at no point overcome by the seriousness of the crisis. I feel that I have learnt a great deal by researching this topic. Both leaders have always interested me and the process of reading many different books and watching documentaries was certainly a fulfilling experience. Nearly all of the material used in my study was of a western origin and the only reservation I have is that I could not find more material produced by Russian historians. However I think that I managed to answer the question thoroughly even without these sources. If I had a little longer on my study I would have developed the traditional Soviet view and also my final chapter, which asked whether both John Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev were irresponsible gamblers. 1 S. Hersh "The Dark Side of Camelot" p.362 2 Timewatch BBC Documentary ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. To what extent was Kennedy a great American President?

    invasions then Cuba and the USSR would think of the US as weak and then take further action with communism. Kennedy found that Cuba were storing nuclear missiles and straight away threatened nuclear war on Kruschev. The world stood on the brink of extinction.

  2. Cuban Missile Crisis Essay

    The Bay of Pigs, April 1961 Eisenhower approved a CIA covert operation against Castro before he left office, and Kennedy inherited the plan for an invasion force of 1500 CIA-trained Cuban exiles to land and encourage a general uprising to overthrow Castro.

  1. Why is President John F Kennedy such a famous and controversial figure in history?

    by the Democratic Party. It also shows the faith and trust the Democratic Party had in Kennedy. Source D is a short paragraph of what two historians thought of Kennedy. Written in 1989, the source compares Kennedy to former presidents. Accusing him of being "too reasonable and conciliatory."

  2. The JFK assassination.

    In fact, one of the many photographs taken that day, this one by press photographer James Altgens, seems to show Oswald standing in the doorway of the building watching the procession approaching Elm Street. Years later, Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry said to newspaper reporters, "We don't have any proof that Oswald fired the rifle, and never did.

  1. Thick, cold mist crept malevolently over the impenetrable dark pool of nothingness that was ...

    Eventually he caught a glimpse of the clearing ahead. He straightened his stance and cloak whilst quickening the pace. She must have seen him coming, or perhaps she just naturally stood stock still? He approached her, and from the moment their eyes locked a real sense of how serious the

  2. Essay Structure

    propelled him into a confrontation with the KKK, even though Garvey preached peace and harmony between black and white in America. In 1929 Malcolm's father's house was burnt down and in 1931 it was generally assumed that he was murdered after his body was found.

  1. Choose any TWO stories you have read in Gullick's "Adventures and Encounters" and write ...

    Although Bird does project the decent aspects of Saigon, her depiction still could not run away from her ethnocentrism attitude. This was because, even when she praised the people there as being gentle and mannerly, her remarks were also indirectly implying that they were uncivilized: ...

  2. The Game.

    The screen went blank. The computer started rumbling. And all of a sudden it went BANG! The computer exploded into bits. "What the heck happened" Ken shouted out, "I d-don't k-know" Luke stammered. Ken stood back away from the wrecked computer so did Luke and Martin. "That's the end of your game" Martin chuckled.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work