• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition Coursework 2

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In What Ways did Prohibition change U.S society in the 1920's? When Prohibition was passed as a law in 1919 the pressure groups who had backed it hoped for a decrease in America's social problems and criminal activities. It did bring positives such as; more productive society, men took more responsibility and boom years. But on the other hand, prohibition appeared to bring about a totally opposite change to the US society; criminal activity increased, not just within organized crime but also throughout the general public who had developed a general disrespect for the law. Furthermore there was a rise in gangster culture due to the enforcing of prohibition; this also led to disrespect for those who were meant to uphold the law within the general public; as gangsters corrupted policemen so their criminal activities could not be prosecuted in court. To help enforce the prohibition law John. F. Crammer became the prohibition commissioner, with a force of 3,000 prohibition agents which portrayed the importance of the situation. ...read more.

Middle

Al Capone years later had been caught out by the law for tax evasion and was put in prison for 11 years, but although this in some eyes he was a pubic hero. Prohibition had a major impact on ordinary citizens as it caused many people to lose profits in their businesses such as; Hotel owners, Brewers and Distillers etc, these were all affected by prohibition, most of them because the selling of alcohol was banned, therefore people looked for an alternative which were gangsters who sold alcohol illegally linking to Al Capone and co again. Many ordinary citizens hated prohibition, one of the reasons was because they claimed that it threatened their freedom which they had rights to have but also the American Federation on labour felt that people were entitled to a drink after a days work, their slogan was "No Beer, No Work". This infuriated people because many of them didn't work as unemployment was high at that time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Prohibition undermined respect for the laws as it led to police corruption; this suggests that prohibition did not help the federal agents in any way. Although Prohibition did not prove to have many positives, it did however change the chemists for the better, this is because due to less alcohol being devoured by people, it was used in other perspectives such as e.g.: Medicines. The alcohol produced was being used for medicines and industrial alcohol this meant that those businesses/industries profited and indeed boomed from Prohibition. In Conclusion prohibition changed the US Society by making the gangsters rise up from the underworld activity and make profits from the illegal smuggling and selling of alcohol, as well as this ordinary citizens were infuriated by the banning of alcohol, loss in businesses and threatening of their freedom etc. Also federal agents were helpless to stop the rise of gangsters and criminal/illegal activities but on the other hand it did change the chemists as they're business boomed from prohibition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Irish Coursework

    However, source F was not bias as it was drawn based of government statistics. This would mean that it was fair and the statistics were 'pure'. To answer the question we must look at both long and short term evidence, most of the sources are long term however, the last two are not.

  2. All My Sons Coursework

    This makes me think that Keller is more concerned about how Chris bringing up the past, will affect him, rather than the effects it will have on Mother who is clearly still grieving for her son. This indicates that Keller is self - centred and only cares about himself.

  1. history coursework 2 - jews

    Unfortunately the results of this act were very limited more blacks were charged with 'incitement to racial hatred, then whites and also the act was not effective against racism (racists were generally not punished). A second law was introduced in 1976 the race relations act (1976)

  2. swansea and the Blits version 2

    complex (This would have been an obvious focus for the Germans interests. Germans also sent spies out to Swansea to find out about the town. They sent plans over Swansea to take pictures of the area and they purchased maps of the town and edited it into German.

  1. History Around us Coursework – Newcastle Keep

    So, the site was very good a Newcastle as it was protected on 3 sides, one by the River Tyne, one by the Pandon Stream and one by the Lort Stream and it was also on top of a natural hill, therefore only one side was left unprotected so it was extremely difficult to attack.

  2. GCSE Prohibition Coursework

    Both Sources agree and disagree. Source A is more opinionated and it just says Prohibition was not a success. Source B suggests Prohibition could have worked however it ultimately failed. 2 - Study Sources C & D Were the artists of these two posters for or against Prohibition?

  1. Battlefields Coursework

    Trench Foot, as I will explain later, was a chief dilemma to the soldiers who, whilst under heavy fire and stress, had to negotiate these muddy, wet ditches. Actually walking through the mud and puddles at Sanctuary Wood gives us a first hand experience of the soldiers' paths around the battlefield.

  2. Rhydymwyn Coursework

    Source D is an interesting source as it is an extract written by Stalin however, this brings up the question of how reliable a source it is because it is most likely biased and written to shown Stalin in a good light.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work