• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. In this essay I will be looking into prohibition, peoples opinions on it and the effects it had on the United States of America. I will be analysing sources

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Prohibition: In this essay I will be looking into prohibition, peoples opinions on it and the effects it had on the United States of America. I will be analysing sources from various periods in the past, stretching from 1910 all the way to 1973. I will be using my analysis of these sources to answer questions on them. Firstly I will be analysing sources 'A' and 'B'. I feel that both the sources agree with prohibition to an extent, as in source 'A' it states that there are many reasons why prohibition started, such as the 'Bad influence' of saloons. The writer feels that the influence of the saloons was bad, therefore agreeing with prohibition. Likewise in source 'B' 'The Women's Christians temperance' union was on what was described as a 'crusade' against one of the 'Great evils of the times-alcohol'. The use of the word 'crusade' shows that the writer thought that their cause was positively good. As their cause was against alcohol, the writer must have agreed with prohibition. Source 'A' was from an American history book, published in 1973. This shows that the source is quite reliable, as it was written after the time of prohibition; and the writer could have looked back on the incident knowing the final outcome. Unlike source 'B', which was written around about 1917, which was before the prohibition law had even been passed. ...read more.


There are several main reasons for this, one being that source 'E' was written two years before prohibition was abolished, so the writer had been around during prohibition. This would make the source very reliable as the writer would know everything that happened and the effects it had on the country and public. Also because the source was taken from a personal letter, it would have been the writer's genuine opinion. Instead of source 'F' which was a speech given at the beginning of prohibition. So would have been extremely one sided, and unaware of the effects it was going to have; like the major increase in crime, and the huge amount of gangsters that would come about. Prohibition also led to the corruption in the authorities, such as the police and the government, the mass of alcohol related smuggling, and the monstrous increase in the amount of deaths per year in America. Neither source 'G' or 'H' show that prohibition was successful. In both sources it is clear that more and more alcohol and alcohol related crimes were being recorded. This can be interpreted as good or bad, good because more alcohol and offenders were being captured, or bad because more alcohol and offences were being made. Emphasising this, it was not common knowledge that for every bottle getting seized, there were another 10 getting through. ...read more.


money for being the government, and then they were getting yet more money from gangsters and saloon owners bribing them to 'turn a blind eye' on their business. The sources that do not believe the failure of prohibition was inevitable are not very powerful and very watery with no evidence. In a way these sources work against prohibition, as looking back on the time of prohibition we can see just how fake it all was. Which emphasises our opinions on the authorities and how corrupt they were. Depending on whether we look at the sources from our own point of view, taking into account what we know in hindsight; or looking at the sources from a person's point of view at the time of prohibition, we can come to two answers. From a member of public's point of view of the time, I would say that several of the sources do not believe that prohibition was bound to fail. But knowing what I know now, I would say that the sources do support the views that prohibition was never going to work. The fact alone that the sources for prohibition are designed with data on it, whether it be true or false to influence the public into believing prohibition is good shows us it is not very reliable. In conclusion I feel that these sources show, perhaps without wanting to, that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. ?? ?? ?? ?? Written By Oliver Shallcrass ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    preserving grain for food, feelings against German-Americans and the influence of the 'Anti-Saloon League'. It also states that the effect of having prohibition introduced was an increase in crime. Source B is another extract taken from a book about American history, published in 1979.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    Additionally, the sheer fact that the government decided that a prohibition commission was necessary, before the law had even come into effect, shows that agents of the law knew beforehand that the law would be too difficult for the regular police to enforce; if such is the case then the failure of the law was surely inevitable.

  1. History essay "The United States"

    Source E is useful to historians because it shows you just how badly the Wall Street crash effected unemployment in Britain, it shows how much increase happened over the years and what exactly had an impact on the percentage. It also shows that the new deal did help unemployment a

  2. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    For some people drinking was an occasional pastime to which did not cause any harm or criminal activity. For other people, they would drink too much and cause trouble and crime. Source E also considers Public Opinion. Rockefeller had hoped that Public Opinion would support prohibition; instead he concludes that Public opinion was against Prohibition.

  1. History - Prohibition

    He has come to realize that prohibition could not work in an American society. Source F was written by John F. Kramer, who was the first Prohibition Commissioner. This meant that his job was to enforce Prohibition. He is speaking in 1920 just when prohibition had been introduced.

  2. The United States 1919 - 1941, The Wall Street Crash

    what kind of propaganda techniques the Democratic Party used to persuade people to vote for them. Question 3 The impact of the Depression on people's lives throughout the US society was tremendous. Nearly ever part of the society was affected by the Depression including the poor, farmers, black Americans, working class and business class.

  1. The effects of Industrialization and globalisation.

    In addition, we will shower these goods on others (who can barely afford them), in order to make them happier (and increase our profits), even if this new form of happiness destroys traditional values. This belief in the healing power of material goods, however, does not apply equally to everyone,

  2. To what extent did America

    American companies lost a lot of money because of this and many people lost their jobs because companies had to shut down factories or couldn't afford to employ them. So between 1922-1927 the companies roared because the Americans only bought there merchandise because the goods from other countries were taxed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work