Prohibition of Alcohol.

Authors Avatar

PROHIBITION OF ALCOHOL

From source A you can learn that they were very much against the sale of alcohol.  Source A is a poster issued in 1910.  It was a propaganda poster.  The Anti saloon league (ASL) were against the sale of alcohol because they believed that the bars would make it’s customers poor (the title of the poster is “The poor man’s club” with a picture of a man handing over all of his wages) and that men, women and children would go without food just for a drink.  (Another image on the poster is of a wife and a child not eating)  The ASL also believed that a customer belongs to the bar like a club and that his wages pay for his membership. (The poster also reads, “A club member in good standing” ‘paying his dues’.  Another strong belief was that the customers were addicted to the saloon and they can’t give it up, they are ‘slaves to the saloon’ and that they belong to the owner of the saloon, ‘the slave holder’.  As well as this there is a story about a man finding out that his wife and children go without food.  This makes people feel guilty if alcohol is not banned.

        In source b and in source c it gives us lots of reasons why prohibition should have been brought into place apart from the ones given in source A.  Source B tells of the ASL and the Women’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) who believed that alcohol is ‘ungodly’, evil and wasteful. It also tells us that ‘Protestants’ protested for prohibition on both religious and economic grounds.  During world war one grain into the manufacturing of alcohol was banned.  At this time prohibition got a boost because the USA were fighting Germany and many breweries were German owned.  The Americans did not buy alcohol because of the hostility with the Germans.  In source C it tells of how John. D. Rockerfeller was very much in favour of prohibition because he believed that without alcohol the workers would be more productive and that there would be a reduction in work related accidents.

        Source E is a German cartoon published in the 1920’s showing Uncle Sam smashing bottles the message in the cartoon is that prohibition of alcohol is not working.  The cartoon shows a demon-like creature pouring more bottles than Uncle Sam can smash.  I think that the creature represents the ‘bootleggers’ like al Capone and I know that Uncle Sam is a representation of the American Government.  The cartoon is clearly sending a message that prohibition is not working.

        I believe that source F does agree with source E because, Source F is a piece of writing by a journalist in 1931 and a journalist’s job is to gather evidence.  It shows that the Government only hired 520 men as prohibition agents to patrol the whole of the USA and when it did go up it was only to 836, which is not enough to cope with a country the size of America.  Also the highest the agent’s salaries reached was $2,300, which was not enough to stop the agents from taking bribes to turn a ‘blind eye’.  All of these things are evidence supporting Source E and it’s message that prohibition doesn’t work.

Join now!

        Source G agrees as well.  Source G is a table showing arrests for drinking offences in Philadelphia 1920-1925 and the extent of increase.  It also shows that the ‘drink driving’ offences went up between the years of 1920-1925.  Here is a sample of the records,‘1921…494, in 1923…645, and finally in 1925…814’ this was an increase of 326.    The number of  ‘habitual drunkards’ (alcoholics) went up; as well in 1920 there were 33 then in 1925 there were 814.  Finally, the total prosecutions for drink related offences rose enormously in the years of 1920 and 1925.  There were 20443 in ...

This is a preview of the whole essay