• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. Source A believes that it was "the influence of the Anti-saloon league" and source B believes that prohibition was "led by the league". Both sources are of the opinion that prohibition led to an increase in crime. This is shown in source A, "

Extracts from this document...


How Far Do These Two Accounts Agree About Prohibition? Both of the two sources agree about prohibition. Source A believes that it was "the influence of the Anti-saloon league" and source B believes that prohibition was "led by the league". Both sources are of the opinion that prohibition led to an increase in crime. This is shown in source A, "it created the greatest criminal boom in American history" and it is implied in source B "gangsters like Dutch Schulz and Al Capone had turned the avoidance of prohibition into big, violent business". Also, they both agree that most of the American public are craving for alcohol and want a constant supply of it. Source A tells us that prohibition goes "against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans" and source B talks about Al Capone plans to "Supply a public demand". The two sources disagree on the causes that started prohibition. Source A gives the idea that the law was passed because of negative feelings towards German-Americans (they were important for brewing). And also the "most important" reason was to "make the world safe for democracy". Source B gives the impression that the law was passed in an attempt to overcome "one of the greatest evils of all time - alcoholism". ...read more.


However, source F is also somewhat reliable because it gives facts that aren't clouded by opinions. Do these two sources prove that prohibition was successful? Source G looks like prohibition was successful because the increase in still and spirits seized can show the prohibition agents as getting better at their jobs. Also, it can give the feeling that the more alcohol seized, the less alcohol available for the public. This is because the amount of stills seized increased from 9, 746 in 1921 to 15, 794 in 1929, and the gallons of spirits seized increased from 414, 000 in 1921 to 11, 860, 000 in 1929. Source H shows a general increase in the amount of arrests for drinking-related offences. In particular the amount of drunk increased from 14, 313 in 1920 to 51, 361 just five years later. This can give the impression that prohibition was unsuccessful because once again it could show that prohibition officers are getting better at their jobs. However, this is unlikely. It would be more reasonable to assume that the increase shows a obvious disrespect for the prohibition law. It also shows that during prohibition - more people are drinking more than they were before. ...read more.


The government lost a huge source of tax income - and if the government loses money, it is likely that the source of money loss is going to be terminated. Prohibition had a chance of success for several reasons. Saloons were referred to people as rundown, dark, gloomy hangouts for absent fathers and husbands. This is proved in source A where saloons were a "bad influence" and also in the cartoon in source D where a mother and a child look at the saloon where their absent father is. Another reason it may have succeeded was the "war time concern for preserving grain for good"; if all Americans had felt this was important then maybe prohibition would have lasted longer. Source C also gives the impression that prohibition would succeed as saloons are too expensive for most to keep going to "the poor man's club - the most expensive in the world to belong to." In conclusion, I feel that although it was more likely that prohibition would fail; there was always a chance of success. The widespread support in the early 1920's proved successful until the even more widespread crime took over and supplied alcohol to America. I feel the inevitability of failure compared with success is 4-1; 80% chance of failure. This is because the laws will never work without the support of the majority of the people affected by them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    This led to workers no longer being needed. People became unemployed and therefore earned no money. The Jarrow Crusade was a march organised by the people of the town from Jarrow to London. The object was to attract attention to the plight of the town.

  2. Why did prohibition fail?

    The Wall Street Crash and the Depression was a short-term reason for Prohibition failing and this is a key reason for it ending when it did, but I think that Prohibition had failed before 1929 and would probably have been abolished without the influence of the Depression, but it was just a question of when it would happen.

  1. History - Prohibition

    Source D shows two children standing outside a saloon, waiting for their father to come out: 'Daddy's in there -'. This poster is designed to make the reader feel sorry for the children and turn against drinking. The word 'Daddy' portrays the innocence of the young children as they seek affection from a father who is not there.

  2. Study sources A and B - How far do these sources agree about prohibition?

    The source also says 'Most important of all the moral fervour inspired by the war'. Source B concentrates more on groups such as the 'Women's Christian Temperance movement' and the 'Anti-saloon league', which both put pressure on the government to introduce a ban against prohibition, however there were marked differences on what they saw as key characteristics.

  1. Prohibition - source related study.

    Source H is a table too, showing the number of arrests for drunk-related offences. It is over a 6-year period (1920, 1923 & 1926). These numbers should be zero as there would be no alcohol consumed, as the prohibition agents would have stopped all the production.

  2. How far was the League of Nations a success in the 1920(TM)s?

    Some evidence: Greece withdrew from Bulgaria in 1925 on the league's orders as she could not afford a full-scale war. Another thing that meant the League of Nations could succeed easily was that there was a peaceful universal atmosphere because of all the of work that was being done by the other organisations and some other agencies.

  1. Prohibition. Source A is from an American history book it was published in ...

    Source F on the other hand is based on what will happen in the future. d) Source G is from federal government statistics from the year 1921-1929.

  2. There are many contributing factors to why prohibition was introduced on 16 January 1920. ...

    By the end of the first year they're where a massive five thousand speakeasies created in New York alone. Some of these where owned by women and became very popular with men and women. It was not just woman who found that their lives had changed since prohibition was passed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work