• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Prohibition. Source A believes that it was "the influence of the Anti-saloon league" and source B believes that prohibition was "led by the league". Both sources are of the opinion that prohibition led to an increase in crime. This is shown in source A, "

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Far Do These Two Accounts Agree About Prohibition? Both of the two sources agree about prohibition. Source A believes that it was "the influence of the Anti-saloon league" and source B believes that prohibition was "led by the league". Both sources are of the opinion that prohibition led to an increase in crime. This is shown in source A, "it created the greatest criminal boom in American history" and it is implied in source B "gangsters like Dutch Schulz and Al Capone had turned the avoidance of prohibition into big, violent business". Also, they both agree that most of the American public are craving for alcohol and want a constant supply of it. Source A tells us that prohibition goes "against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans" and source B talks about Al Capone plans to "Supply a public demand". The two sources disagree on the causes that started prohibition. Source A gives the idea that the law was passed because of negative feelings towards German-Americans (they were important for brewing). And also the "most important" reason was to "make the world safe for democracy". Source B gives the impression that the law was passed in an attempt to overcome "one of the greatest evils of all time - alcoholism". ...read more.

Middle

However, source F is also somewhat reliable because it gives facts that aren't clouded by opinions. Do these two sources prove that prohibition was successful? Source G looks like prohibition was successful because the increase in still and spirits seized can show the prohibition agents as getting better at their jobs. Also, it can give the feeling that the more alcohol seized, the less alcohol available for the public. This is because the amount of stills seized increased from 9, 746 in 1921 to 15, 794 in 1929, and the gallons of spirits seized increased from 414, 000 in 1921 to 11, 860, 000 in 1929. Source H shows a general increase in the amount of arrests for drinking-related offences. In particular the amount of drunk increased from 14, 313 in 1920 to 51, 361 just five years later. This can give the impression that prohibition was unsuccessful because once again it could show that prohibition officers are getting better at their jobs. However, this is unlikely. It would be more reasonable to assume that the increase shows a obvious disrespect for the prohibition law. It also shows that during prohibition - more people are drinking more than they were before. ...read more.

Conclusion

The government lost a huge source of tax income - and if the government loses money, it is likely that the source of money loss is going to be terminated. Prohibition had a chance of success for several reasons. Saloons were referred to people as rundown, dark, gloomy hangouts for absent fathers and husbands. This is proved in source A where saloons were a "bad influence" and also in the cartoon in source D where a mother and a child look at the saloon where their absent father is. Another reason it may have succeeded was the "war time concern for preserving grain for good"; if all Americans had felt this was important then maybe prohibition would have lasted longer. Source C also gives the impression that prohibition would succeed as saloons are too expensive for most to keep going to "the poor man's club - the most expensive in the world to belong to." In conclusion, I feel that although it was more likely that prohibition would fail; there was always a chance of success. The widespread support in the early 1920's proved successful until the even more widespread crime took over and supplied alcohol to America. I feel the inevitability of failure compared with success is 4-1; 80% chance of failure. This is because the laws will never work without the support of the majority of the people affected by them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Source D shows a report from the Jarrow Public Health Committee, published in 1933. ...

    This led to workers no longer being needed. People became unemployed and therefore earned no money. The Jarrow Crusade was a march organised by the people of the town from Jarrow to London. The object was to attract attention to the plight of the town.

  2. Why was prohibition introduced

    Cars needed fuel to run on, Petrol, which led to a boom in companies such as "Esso Oil" which was owned by John D Rockefeller. Many companies could now afford to advertise their goods by advertising on T.V./radio; billboards etc.Advertising was seen to work because by 1929 four point nine million radios had been sold.

  1. How far was the League of Nations a success in the 1920(TM)s?

    Some evidence: Greece withdrew from Bulgaria in 1925 on the league's orders as she could not afford a full-scale war. Another thing that meant the League of Nations could succeed easily was that there was a peaceful universal atmosphere because of all the of work that was being done by the other organisations and some other agencies.

  2. Prohibition - How far does Source I prove the policeman in Source J is ...

    This cartoon can also be interpreted in different ways, one of them being that everyone in the cartoon is fat - this could suggest that they are all inflated with money, as they are being paid quite a lot.

  1. Free essay

    Three sources on Prohibition. Source C is a German cartoon, commenting on prohibition.

    in source C because it shows what a lousy job the trained people were doing and that anybody could do that job. Source E which is a table which shows arrests for drinking offences in Philadelphia 1920-25 also supports Source C as crimes due to drinking have increased from being

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    From source C I can see that no shops are open. This suggests that everyone has no money as if nobody has any money to buy food from the shops then the shopkeeper would go out of business and they would then have no money.

  1. History - Prohibition

    Source B, on the other hand, only focuses on the Women's Temperance Movement and does not mention any other factors for the introduction of Prohibition: 'A nation-wide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on Congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing'.

  2. To what extent was the abolition of Prohibition in 1933 due to an increase ...

    Speakeasies were introduced as places where people could come and drink alcohol. Patrons had to speak very quietly or 'easy' in order to avoid arrest. These places flourished as drinking became fashionable. By 1928 there were at least 30,000 situated in New York.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work